How much butt is showing?

Recremen

Okay since either the rest of you are cowards or all the threads have been deleted, I'll be the one to ask. How much butt is showing on that new cash shop costume? I normally just buy the stuff myself so I can show how it dyes on the forums, but the $20 price tag had me spinning. So what's the verdict? Is it twenty dollars worth of ass? What's the modesty shadow look like? IS there a modesty shadow? If not, is there some kind of bikini thing going on? Asking the important questions over here.

jlboozer

I guarantee not enough...

NetViperX

There is a video of it in the crown store sub-forum, looks like the whole butt is covered. Basically from the waist down it looks the same from the back as it does the front.

TequilaFire

On my Khajiit the preview shows a lot of tail.

Lynx7386

TequilaFire wrote: »

On my Khajiit the preview shows a lot of tail.

Pics or it didnt happen >.>

Recremen

Lynx7386 wrote: »

TequilaFire wrote: »

On my Khajiit the preview shows a lot of tail.

Pics or it didnt happen >.>

Like, it LOOKS like there's just straight up no undies, but obvi that can't really be the case, even without our characters having actual modeling done "under the hood". Or, perhaps, especially because of. Either way, not really my kind of costume, the cut just doesn't work for any of my characters, but still worth asking after.

Nighn_9

Recremen wrote: »

So what's the verdict? Is it twenty dollars worth of ass?

lmao xD

Recremen

Nighn_9 wrote: »

Recremen wrote: »

So what's the verdict? Is it twenty dollars worth of ass?

lmao xD

This is why we gotta bring back the lol button.

xenowarrior92eb17_ESO

always thought there will never be a costume to take nr 2 on my disappointment list...I have found the winner.
Disappointment List:
1. Breton Hero Costume
2. Shriek's Nocturnal Frock

zaria

Recremen wrote: »

Lynx7386 wrote: »

TequilaFire wrote: »

On my Khajiit the preview shows a lot of tail.

Pics or it didnt happen >.>

Like, it LOOKS like there's just straight up no undies, but obvi that can't really be the case, even without our characters having actual modeling done "under the hood". Or, perhaps, especially because of. Either way, not really my kind of costume, the cut just doesn't work for any of my characters, but still worth asking after.

Note that the Oblivion models had an topless skin who was needed for low cut dresses who would show the sports bra default underwear.
Decent chance ESO has the same.

RANKK7

For me it's NOT worth the $20. Such a letdown the design ("sack effect" on waist and the arms are so plain and dull, would have preferred sleeveless at that point, only the shoes are good) and there is also a ISSUE because this Studio seems to lack QA.
Overpriced sloppy model, that's it.

Girl_Number8

Oh my I wish they would hire another woman to design some of these costumes. I am starting to think the S in eSo stands for something else.

pattyLtd

Girl_Number8 wrote: »

Oh my I wish they would hire another woman to design some of these costumes. I am starting to think the S in eSo stands for something else.

I know right.
Looked forward to this custome and the two of last week but all look weird.
2k crowns for a torn up garbage bag, i never seem to learn

monktoasty

20 dollars?? And they wonder why microtransactions are hates so bad. Why is one costume 20 dollars? It's insane

Path

Metal Bikini!!!
(There is no underwear in space)

PrayingSeraph

Girl_Number8 wrote: »

Oh my I wish they would hire another woman to design some of these costumes. I am starting to think the S in eSo stands for something else.

Sexy? Because that's what this costume is and there's absolutely nothing wrong whatsoever with that.

Sevalaricgirl

PrayingSeraph wrote: »

Girl_Number8 wrote: »

Oh my I wish they would hire another woman to design some of these costumes. I am starting to think the S in eSo stands for something else.

Sexy? Because that's what this costume is and there's absolutely nothing wrong whatsoever with that.

Why because it shows thighs and cleavage that is really non existent in this game? I am with the players that think it's not worth 20.00.

Turbotailz

Sevalaricgirl wrote: »

PrayingSeraph wrote: »

Girl_Number8 wrote: »

Oh my I wish they would hire another woman to design some of these costumes. I am starting to think the S in eSo stands for something else.

Sexy? Because that's what this costume is and there's absolutely nothing wrong whatsoever with that.

Why because it shows thighs and cleavage that is really non existent in this game? I am with the players that think it's not worth 20.00.

Yeah even though I had enough crown points to purchase it. I can say the costume is about 5/10 than what it appears in advertisement. Since players claiming the costume is bugging I hope they fix it fast and give it attention.

dcam86b14_ESO

Everyone has their own definition of value. So the value of something is in the eye of the credit card holder.

opaj

I'm with @Girl_Number8 . I don't mind sexy outfits, but it seems like the majority of outfits aimed at female characters for the last year have been pretty revealing, while most of the outfits aimed at male characters have left them covered head-to-toe.

(Because I'm crazy like that, I did a quick look at the last year's worth of Crown Showcases--the last time we had a new costume with full skin coverage that was advertised with a female character in the screenshot was last February with the Desert Garden Gala Overdress. To be fair, we also had the Naryuu costume since then, which has a questionable hole in the chest but not to any degree that I would call overtly sexy. A female and male character were also featured together in the screenshots for the Falkreath Thane and Telvani Wizard-Lord outfits, but every other costume featuring a female had lots and lots of skin showing. In comparison, the only outfits advertised for males that fit this description are the three Argonian outfits.)

So what I'm saying is... try to balance the sexy and practical a little more, please! More cute (but modest) dresses! And maybe a few more scanty wardrobe options for male characters, while you're at it!

PrayingSeraph

Sevalaricgirl wrote: »

PrayingSeraph wrote: »

Girl_Number8 wrote: »

Oh my I wish they would hire another woman to design some of these costumes. I am starting to think the S in eSo stands for something else.

Sexy? Because that's what this costume is and there's absolutely nothing wrong whatsoever with that.

Why because it shows thighs and cleavage that is really non existent in this game? I am with the players that think it's not worth 20.00.

Yes, thighs and cleavage are considered sexy by a very large portion of the human race.

Now whether it's worth 20$ is up to the individual. That's just relative. Just as literally anything in the crown store. Or even the game itself.

Girl_Number8

PrayingSeraph wrote: »

Girl_Number8 wrote: »

Oh my I wish they would hire another woman to design some of these costumes. I am starting to think the S in eSo stands for something else.

Sexy? Because that's what this costume is and there's absolutely nothing wrong whatsoever with that.

Sexy that is not sexy, lol.

radiostar

Not much, as in none:

PrayingSeraph

Girl_Number8 wrote: »

PrayingSeraph wrote: »

Girl_Number8 wrote: »

Oh my I wish they would hire another woman to design some of these costumes. I am starting to think the S in eSo stands for something else.

Sexy? Because that's what this costume is and there's absolutely nothing wrong whatsoever with that.

Sexy that is not sexy, lol.

Considering the popularity of nocturnal design by the TES community from Skyrim, or the high demand of this costume, I'd say it's considered sexy by many. It's also befitting of a goddess, which Nocturnal is.

Acrolas

To put this puppy to rest, yes there's a 'bikini bottom' under the frock, roughly the same color as the frock itself.

No Basic Instinct to be had here.

Ch4mpTW

Acrolas wrote: »

To put this puppy to rest, yes there's a 'bikini bottom' under the frock, roughly the same color as the frock itself.

No Basic Instinct to be had here.

Are we talking about Spongebob’s town, or are we talking about buns? Lmao.

Anyway... I just wanted to say thanks for the heads up, everyone. Looks like another costume I’ll pass on, after seeing all of the glitches with it and the lack of cheeks being shown.

LadyAstrum

I don't care that it's revealing or sexy or whatever, what irritates me is the back and arms have no shape, and the material is too shiny. Would have been nice if the common dyes at least took the shine off.

Korah_Eaglecry

Recremen wrote: »

Lynx7386 wrote: »

TequilaFire wrote: »

On my Khajiit the preview shows a lot of tail.

Pics or it didnt happen >.>

Like, it LOOKS like there's just straight up no undies, but obvi that can't really be the case, even without our characters having actual modeling done "under the hood". Or, perhaps, especially because of. Either way, not really my kind of costume, the cut just doesn't work for any of my characters, but still worth asking after.

Dont ask me how I know, but there is what appears to be a cloth like diaper under the dress....Either that or a really frumpy pair of *** tighties.

CardboardedBox

opaj wrote: »

I'm with @Girl_Number8 . I don't mind sexy outfits, but it seems like the majority of outfits aimed at female characters for the last year have been pretty revealing, while most of the outfits aimed at male characters have left them covered head-to-toe.

(Because I'm crazy like that, I did a quick look at the last year's worth of Crown Showcases--the last time we had a new costume with full skin coverage that was advertised with a female character in the screenshot was last February with the Desert Garden Gala Overdress. To be fair, we also had the Naryuu costume since then, which has a questionable hole in the chest but not to any degree that I would call overtly sexy. A female and male character were also featured together in the screenshots for the Falkreath Thane and Telvani Wizard-Lord outfits, but every other costume featuring a female had lots and lots of skin showing. In comparison, the only outfits advertised for males that fit this description are the three Argonian outfits.)

So what I'm saying is... try to balance the sexy and practical a little more, please! More cute (but modest) dresses! And maybe a few more scanty wardrobe options for male characters, while you're at it!

The was a barbarian costume datamined a while back that I'm still crossing my fingers for. It was basically the Nord towel, except it was actually good.

It was straight up Conan the barbarian.

.....or I guess in zenimax/ bethesdaland, Grognak the barbarian.

Axoinus

OPs questions would be easier to answer if the photo in the thread wasn't of a male cat person.

Elsonso

PrayingSeraph wrote: »

Girl_Number8 wrote: »

PrayingSeraph wrote: »

Girl_Number8 wrote: »

Oh my I wish they would hire another woman to design some of these costumes. I am starting to think the S in eSo stands for something else.

Sexy? Because that's what this costume is and there's absolutely nothing wrong whatsoever with that.

Sexy that is not sexy, lol.

Considering the popularity of nocturnal design by the TES community from Skyrim, or the high demand of this costume, I'd say it's considered sexy by many. It's also befitting of a goddess, which Nocturnal is.

I would buy it for lore reasons. I don't think it is worth 2000 Crowns, though.