THE Solution to ESO's current state

NyassaV

Buff EVERYONE'S base regen but say like 50 (the amount could be changed). Discuss!

Chilly-McFreeze

In case you didnt know: the higher your regen the lower your chances to encounter lag, Bugs and crashes.

KochDerDamonen

Other

"Current state" of what, your resource bars not being full at the moment?

ESO's current state is the result of years of carefully crafted (and accidentally shatted) decisions.

NyassaV

KochDerDamonen wrote: »

"Current state" of what, your resource bars not being full at the moment?

ESO's current state is the result of years of carefully crafted (and accidentally shatted) decisions.

Combat is slugish and slow. Adding 50 regen would still make things easier and heavy attack builds viable. But it would enable so much for in both PvE and PvP. Diversity would actually exist

Chilly-McFreeze

Remember why resource Management was gutted?
And how will make higher regen Heavy attack builds viable? The Opposite if anything. Strength of ha is res Return.

Leandor

50 regen. As in 50 mag/stam/health more every two seconds.

I would like to have some of the same stuff op has consumed.

ak_pvp

Revert all the non CP oriented sustain changes.

NyassaV

Chilly-McFreeze wrote: »

Remember why resource Management was gutted?
And how will make higher regen Heavy attack builds viable? The Opposite if anything. Strength of ha is res Return.

It's 50 regen. Not much. Heavy attack builds are viable no matter what. This doesn't harm them. But it allowed them to cast more dots even

Doctordarkspawn

Not bad, maybe a bit more though

RESCEND THE SUSTAIN CHANGES.

FIRE WHO PROPOSED THEM.

ONLY WAY.

Chilly-McFreeze

Hollery wrote: »

Chilly-McFreeze wrote: »

Remember why resource Management was gutted?
And how will make higher regen Heavy attack builds viable? The Opposite if anything. Strength of ha is res Return.

It's 50 regen. Not much. Heavy attack builds are viable no matter what. This doesn't harm them. But it allowed them to cast more dots even

Ah ok. I misunderstood. Still, it wont help much. The "Need for change" goes deeper

Judas Helviaryn

No way!

Obligatory L2P post

dsalter

Other

how does this help anything?
zerg trains will still zerg, perma blockers will still perma block, gangblades will still gank.

idk

Other

Not going to happen. Very much opposite of what Zos did earlier this year but greatly restricting our regen.

akredon_ESO

I like Heavy attacking for resources i dunno why just a mechanic i like. But what i do hate about it is how freakin buggy the animations are.

Edziu

Other

what about revert it to around patch 1.6 where you had just 1.4k health in place of today 18k?

ToRelax

No way!

If you want to have more enjoyable gameplay options, balance the existing mechanics and/or add new ones. This is just pure power creep for no reason whatsoever.

Slick_007

Hollery wrote: »

Combat is slugish and slow. Adding 50 regen would still make things easier and heavy attack builds viable. But it would enable so much for in both PvE and PvP. Diversity would actually exist

Hollery wrote: »

It's 50 regen. Not much. Heavy attack builds are viable no matter what. This doesn't harm them. But it allowed them to cast more dots even

so they arent viable already, or they are? please make up your mind.

still no.

ArchMikem

50? Thats it? Put another zero on there and Im listening.