PVP CAMPAIGN IDEA = best ever series #3

generalmyrick · September 2017

I'll try to compact this...but here goes! ==>

I think there should be a campaign that is only eligible to players that have never had emperor AND a campaign that is only for emperors. completely remove rewards for the campaign that is for non-emps only AND make the rewards for the emp only campaign SOOOOO good that it would attract the emp masters to the campaign.

what do you you all think? :-)

Chrlynsch · September 2017

Bet not a single wall on any keep would be below 100%.

generalmyrick · September 2017

Chrlynsch wrote: »

Bet not a single wall on any keep would be below 100%.

and walls should be at 100%! :-)

geonsocal · October 2017

generalmyrick wrote: »

I'll try to compact this...but here goes! ==>

I think there should be a campaign that is only eligible to players that have never had emperor AND a campaign that is only for emperors. completely remove rewards for the campaign that is for non-emps only AND make the rewards for the emp only campaign SOOOOO good that it would attract the emp masters to the campaign.

what do you you all think? :-)

howdy @generalmyrick ...see your ID all the time in zone chat...i just can't remember which alliance...

been a tough campaign - competition wise...can't wait until it's finished...

hmmmm, interesting suggestion...exactly what is it that's in your mind?

generalmyrick · October 2017

well, i thought this system would be fair to non-emps so they can get emp AND people that already have emp because they will be eligible for bigger and better rewards.

after posting this though i was called into a 7 day camp to help a player who has already had emp to get emp again. im not mad at anybody, but they were already running with some very powerful ranks/names.

soll · October 2017

With this useless campaigns which are left from pvp event, only the laziest one didn't get emp. And yea, 80%+ of the "former emperors" are false ones. So I'm not sure if it's going to be good split factor.

But naked-no-armor-weapons campaign would be so funny and cool, lol. At least like event, for example, for April's fools day

SugaComa · October 2017

I just want the addition of a 4 hour campaign that resets to neutral on completion where you can challenge 2 other guilds to battle to see who will be crowned Victor

Zvorgin · October 2017

Rather than splitting emps and non-emps, there needs to be a campaign that redesigns how keeps work on a macro level. Maybe eliminate the links between them and make them more oriented to guilds where guilds can spend AP they earn on upgrades to defenses (stronger walls, tougher NPCs, permanent siege engines, patrols that go further out from the keep to the point that resources are defended by high level patrols). The keeps could also give higher AP rewards to the defending guild the further they are from the gates of the alliance.

disintegr8 · October 2017

I don't care about getting Emp myself - I work for a living. What I hate is the number of times the same players get emp in campaign after campaign, even in Kyne, just shows that some people need to get a life.

Zvorgin wrote: »

Rather than splitting emps and non-emps, there needs to be a campaign that redesigns how keeps work on a macro level. Maybe eliminate the links between them and make them more oriented to guilds where guilds can spend AP they earn on upgrades to defenses (stronger walls, tougher NPCs, permanent siege engines, patrols that go further out from the keep to the point that resources are defended by high level patrols). The keeps could also give higher AP rewards to the defending guild the further they are from the gates of the alliance.

Some good ideas here.

I'd like to see more reward for defence and retention of resources. The number of times you get 2-3 bars on for an alliance until they get Emp and then they all immediately log off, leaving everything unguarded again. Maybe the alliance could get increased rewards based on time they have Emp, or length of time resources are held onto.