Why do people complaining about the graphics always take the screenshots at night? That's always puzzled me.
Why do people complaining about the graphics always take the screenshots at night? That's always puzzled me.
For me personally I noticed a lot of the graphical issues were at night....this hasn't always been the case if fact I wish we could get back where the game was graphically a couple patches before launch, some of the graphical issues that seem to plague folks now just wasn't around.
I have also noticed that Nivida folks seem to have it worse than Raedon users.....I'm not even going to try and guess at solutions the engine that ZoS built for this game has always been something of a mystery.
Jayman1000 wrote: »Something that hasn't been mentioned here is running double resolution of your monitors native resolution. If you have an nvidia card you can use their Dynamic Super Resolution(DSR) feature which does this, and it works very well. If you got a 1920x1080 screen you'll effectively be getting 4K resolution. Of course 4K has a toll on performance but the result is astonishingly smooth and sharp resolution and textures. But I do this with a 5(!) year old gtx690 card on a 5 year old gaming rig with al settings to highest possible (except shadow, distance drawing and subsampling quality) and get 60 fps almost everywhere, except at few places in some cities I get ~50-60 fps. Since this card has two GPU's you can use SLI which can do absolute wonders with performance in ESO. However SLI is not supported in ESO by default on most systems; so you'll need to tweak your nvidia settings accordingly for use with ESO. (let me know if you need help doing this, and I'll reply with a guide).
On top of that you can use SweetFX with very great effect, for a bit of performance cost (depending on how many features you use), as the posts above mentions with for example Reshade preset settings (here is a link btw if you need it: https://sfx.thelazy.net/games/preset/7111/
The Sweetfx Heroic 2.1 preset found on nexusmods can also be used, it has almost zero performance cost, so could be a wise choice instead of the above Reshade preset.
If some of the above options hits your performance too much you might want to consider lowering the games "subsampling quality" from High to Medium. On my system the visual difference is neglible and only really noticable when close studying screenshots, while the fps drop is high from 5-25 fps depending on the local environment on screen.
*EDIT to update link to reshade preset.
Why do people complaining about the graphics always take the screenshots at night? That's always puzzled me.
For me personally I noticed a lot of the graphical issues were at night....this hasn't always been the case if fact I wish we could get back where the game was graphically a couple patches before launch, some of the graphical issues that seem to plague folks now just wasn't around.
I have also noticed that Nivida folks seem to have it worse than Raedon users.....I'm not even going to try and guess at solutions the engine that ZoS built for this game has always been something of a mystery.
Really? I've had a couple of different Nvidia cards while playing ESO (currently a GTX 960, previously a 560ti I think) and both have run the game perfectly with no graphic issues or failings. Most people regardless of their graphics card seem to comment on the beauty of the game rather than its shortcomings, and every time someone produces an enhancement tool most players end up saying they prefer the original screenshot to the "enhanced" one. Given that the game is over 3 years old the number of players complaining here about the graphics is incredibly small and it only rarely comes up. I've also noticed, incidentally, that not only do they take their screenshots at night but they never give their system specs including the obvious one, namely the graphics card!
I used to have a 690 as well and did the same thing, but it ran so hot it was ridiculous. I recently upgraded to a 1050ti and I have better performance across the board, and it was 25% of the original price of a 690.
Jayman1000 wrote: »I used to have a 690 as well and did the same thing, but it ran so hot it was ridiculous. I recently upgraded to a 1050ti and I have better performance across the board, and it was 25% of the original price of a 690.
My 690 peaks at 83 degrees celcius at 100% load on both cores when the card is freshly cleaned of dust. No overclocking and there is good airflow in my cabinet. Dust collects inside the card though over time and its temps will rise approximately ~0.5-1 celcius per month in my experience. 83 celcius may seem hot, but I have never had any problems except that one time where I didn't clean it for a year and it climbed above 95 celcius and began crashing on me
I have to say I'm surprised that my aging 690 still performs rather well on even new and demanding games (mostly because it's 5 year old and I didn't expect it to last so good so long); though I almost always have success with it using SLI, and that does a major difference. Did you run SLI on ESO with your 690? If not, it severely under performs. 690 without SLI is a waste in most cases.
I did , cleaned it regularly and have extremely good airflow in my build, but my 690 fried 3 times in 3 years, and the guy who kept replacing them said it is a known issue because the card just runs too hot. My new 1050ti runs at 55° tops. Most other games its a 35-40°