Templar Total Dark

wibbz

Ok so i play on PS4 and i want to know if Total dark is bugged or if i am just an unlucky dude because i cant brake it.....this morning i play my stamwarden bow build and i got smashed by a templar due to was not able to break it And all my skills reflect back or is it not possible to brake it!?

Olupajmibanan

It was changed few patches ago. It now lasts a lot less but can't be broken free.

Skander

Npc Total Dark: works like old total dark (reflects wips and concealed weapons) but it's also unbreakable
New Total dark: lasts 3.5 seconds, unbreakable, reflects only projectiles, gives free cc in the end.

You can break total dark if you are stunned in it.


Ergo: it's not worth the 3.3k cost

wibbz

Aha i see thanks for the info!

Subversus

Skander wrote: »

Npc Total Dark: works like old total dark (reflects wips and concealed weapons) but it's also unbreakable
New Total dark: lasts 3.5 seconds, unbreakable, reflects only projectiles, gives free cc in the end.

You can break total dark if you are stunned in it.


Ergo: it's not worth the 3.3k cost

????????????????

It literally negates destro/resto magblade, put it on one and they can't do anything but heavy attack with their resto backbar. Why is it not worth the cost? I'm pretty sure it's worth the cost in the right situation. I really think you should elaborate that statement.

Merlin13KAGL

Can you (currently) hit multiple targets with this?

I know at first you could, then you couldn't, and with last change I think you can, but honestly don't recall.

Joy_Division

Subversus wrote: »

Skander wrote: »

Npc Total Dark: works like old total dark (reflects wips and concealed weapons) but it's also unbreakable
New Total dark: lasts 3.5 seconds, unbreakable, reflects only projectiles, gives free cc in the end.

You can break total dark if you are stunned in it.


Ergo: it's not worth the 3.3k cost

????????????????

It literally negates destro/resto magblade, put it on one and they can't do anything but heavy attack with their resto backbar. Why is it not worth the cost? I'm pretty sure it's worth the cost in the right situation. I really think you should elaborate that statement.

Because that's the only spec it's good against. And only if a templar does not use an actual CC skill like javelin or charge or Vamp drain, because if it does, the defensive benefits are lost. Against melee specs, the spell is useless.

Zos has changed this skill more times than any other in the game and still most templars just avoid using it entirely. It's because at a fundamental level Eclipse is an overly niche spell that isn't nearly as good or versatile people who aren't magplars mains think it is.

Skander

Subversus wrote: »

Skander wrote: »

Npc Total Dark: works like old total dark (reflects wips and concealed weapons) but it's also unbreakable
New Total dark: lasts 3.5 seconds, unbreakable, reflects only projectiles, gives free cc in the end.

You can break total dark if you are stunned in it.


Ergo: it's not worth the 3.3k cost

????????????????

It literally negates destro/resto magblade, put it on one and they can't do anything but heavy attack with their resto backbar. Why is it not worth the cost? I'm pretty sure it's worth the cost in the right situation. I really think you should elaborate that statement.

It's worth in 1-2 situations. It's not good becouse for winning you must stun. If you stun they will be able to break Total Dark.
In cyrodill is worthless becouse it's high cost.