WhiteCoatSyndrome wrote: »
- Daedra CAN create (they were et'Ada like the Aedra at one point, after all!) they just choose not to most of the time since it costs them power.
WhiteCoatSyndrome wrote: »Don't forget we do have one other account of a Daedric Prince producing offspring.
(Lyranth had an Answers Your Questions answer that was relevant, but she runs into the same issue as Vivec, namely: she's a Dremora, and therefore untrustworthy by default.)
I don't think Demiprinces are derived from the Daedric Princes. If you go back to the Dawn, when the et'Ada formed, there are more Aedric et'Ada than just the Divines - Magnus, Phynaster, Syrabane, Xarxes, Y'ffre, to name a few - so it would be reasonable to assume that there are also more Daedric et'Ada than just the Princes, and that's where I think the Demiprinces came from.WhiteCoatSyndrome wrote: »It is commonly held that the Daedra cannot create, they can only change and imitate. How, then, are they able to reproduce and create Demiprinces? I have a few theories, but nothing I can prove:Thoughts? Theories?
- A Daedric Prince took an existing embryo (or vestige, or other malleable mortal base) and warped it to be like them. Thus, the act of creation was performed by someone else.
- The Demiprinces aren't offspring in the traditional sense, but a sort of fragment that broke off and became a separate entity. (See: Umbriel)
- The Daedric Princes are sufficiently different from lesser Daedra that they can ignore the restriction.
- Daedra CAN create (they were et'Ada like the Aedra at one point, after all!) they just choose not to most of the time since it costs them power.