Every (magicka) skill has a tooltip equation that looks somewhat like this:
Tooltip = A*M + B*S + C
Where M is magicka and S is spell damage, and A, B, C are constants. C is typically very small and can be ignored. With most skills, B/A ~ 10.5, meaning spell damage contributes just over 10 times that of magicka. There are some exceptions, like with shields, where B is negligible and magicka is the only real contributor.
In your example, 4k magicka is roughly equivalent to 400 spell damage. Note, though, that it is far easier and more effective to buff spell damage than magicka, even though spell damage does not work on everything, so you'll need to strike a balance.
Every (magicka) skill has a tooltip equation that looks somewhat like this:
Tooltip = A*M + B*S + C
Where M is magicka and S is spell damage, and A, B, C are constants. C is typically very small and can be ignored. With most skills, B/A ~ 10.5, meaning spell damage contributes just over 10 times that of magicka. There are some exceptions, like with shields, where B is negligible and magicka is the only real contributor.
In your example, 4k magicka is roughly equivalent to 400 spell damage. Note, though, that it is far easier and more effective to buff spell damage than magicka, even though spell damage does not work on everything, so you'll need to strike a balance.
Could you please explain why is it easier and more effective to buff spell damage than magicka?
Also, I am using 6 abilities (both bars) that deal shock damage. What do you think will be more beneficial to boost its damage, 400 damage to shock abilities or 4k magicka?
Wreuntzylla wrote: »Every (magicka) skill has a tooltip equation that looks somewhat like this:
Tooltip = A*M + B*S + C
Where M is magicka and S is spell damage, and A, B, C are constants. C is typically very small and can be ignored. With most skills, B/A ~ 10.5, meaning spell damage contributes just over 10 times that of magicka. There are some exceptions, like with shields, where B is negligible and magicka is the only real contributor.
In your example, 4k magicka is roughly equivalent to 400 spell damage. Note, though, that it is far easier and more effective to buff spell damage than magicka, even though spell damage does not work on everything, so you'll need to strike a balance.
Could you please explain why is it easier and more effective to buff spell damage than magicka?
Also, I am using 6 abilities (both bars) that deal shock damage. What do you think will be more beneficial to boost its damage, 400 damage to shock abilities or 4k magicka?
I think it's 10.46 magicka = 1 spell damage.
The reason people often focus on spell damage is because there is more spell damage available and more ways to boost it (there is no minor or major sorcery for magicka). This is because Magicka is not only a damage source, but a resource pool.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/284053/buffs-and-debuffs-a-full-list-updated-for-morrowind/p1
More beneficial depends on what you are after. For pure damage, power.
If I inderstand it correctly there is a difference between: magic / flame / frost / shock damage, right? While Spell damage and max magicka boost all of the listed types of damage, right?
Wreuntzylla wrote: »Every (magicka) skill has a tooltip equation that looks somewhat like this:
Tooltip = A*M + B*S + C
Where M is magicka and S is spell damage, and A, B, C are constants. C is typically very small and can be ignored. With most skills, B/A ~ 10.5, meaning spell damage contributes just over 10 times that of magicka. There are some exceptions, like with shields, where B is negligible and magicka is the only real contributor.
In your example, 4k magicka is roughly equivalent to 400 spell damage. Note, though, that it is far easier and more effective to buff spell damage than magicka, even though spell damage does not work on everything, so you'll need to strike a balance.
Could you please explain why is it easier and more effective to buff spell damage than magicka?
Also, I am using 6 abilities (both bars) that deal shock damage. What do you think will be more beneficial to boost its damage, 400 damage to shock abilities or 4k magicka?
I think it's 10.46 magicka = 1 spell damage.
The reason people often focus on spell damage is because there is more spell damage available and more ways to boost it (there is no minor or major sorcery for magicka). This is because Magicka is not only a damage source, but a resource pool.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/284053/buffs-and-debuffs-a-full-list-updated-for-morrowind/p1
More beneficial depends on what you are after. For pure damage, power.
Thx for the source, I am looking at it now.
I am building my set up and can't decide whether I should retain 4k magicka or 400 damage to shock abilities for my front bar
The front bar has theese skills (I use lightening staff): lightening flood, elemental blockade, mages wrath, destro ult, volatile pet aoe (also shock), crystal fragments. Thus, I have 5 skills which are shock damage. So what would be more beneficial to keep, 400 shock damage or 4k max magicka?
If I inderstand it correctly there is a difference between: magic / flame / frost / shock damage, right? While Spell damage and max magicka boost all of the listed types of damage, right?
Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »Wreuntzylla wrote: »Every (magicka) skill has a tooltip equation that looks somewhat like this:
Tooltip = A*M + B*S + C
Where M is magicka and S is spell damage, and A, B, C are constants. C is typically very small and can be ignored. With most skills, B/A ~ 10.5, meaning spell damage contributes just over 10 times that of magicka. There are some exceptions, like with shields, where B is negligible and magicka is the only real contributor.
In your example, 4k magicka is roughly equivalent to 400 spell damage. Note, though, that it is far easier and more effective to buff spell damage than magicka, even though spell damage does not work on everything, so you'll need to strike a balance.
Could you please explain why is it easier and more effective to buff spell damage than magicka?
Also, I am using 6 abilities (both bars) that deal shock damage. What do you think will be more beneficial to boost its damage, 400 damage to shock abilities or 4k magicka?
I think it's 10.46 magicka = 1 spell damage.
The reason people often focus on spell damage is because there is more spell damage available and more ways to boost it (there is no minor or major sorcery for magicka). This is because Magicka is not only a damage source, but a resource pool.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/284053/buffs-and-debuffs-a-full-list-updated-for-morrowind/p1
More beneficial depends on what you are after. For pure damage, power.
Thx for the source, I am looking at it now.
I am building my set up and can't decide whether I should retain 4k magicka or 400 damage to shock abilities for my front bar
The front bar has theese skills (I use lightening staff): lightening flood, elemental blockade, mages wrath, destro ult, volatile pet aoe (also shock), crystal fragments. Thus, I have 5 skills which are shock damage. So what would be more beneficial to keep, 400 shock damage or 4k max magicka?
If I inderstand it correctly there is a difference between: magic / flame / frost / shock damage, right? While Spell damage and max magicka boost all of the listed types of damage, right?
The sorc pets only scale on max magic, regardless of the type of damage they do. So sorcs that use pets need to stack magic more then spell damage.