Monster sets needs more diversity!

teladoy

Why there isn't more diversity with the monster sets? the better ones do fire damage or are for stamina users, but sorcerers have really no good sets shock or magic damage, even Templars got some skills that do fire damage but i would say even for them there are not good sets i believe.

Skoria, Grothdarr, Infernal Guardian, Selene, Velidreth these sets are perfect for flame users or stamina. Sorcerers have Molag Kena, Nerien'eth and Iceheart? come on, lets compare these sets with the ones of before and is very clear who wins.

Huyen

You forget the ones from CoA, CoH and VoM sets. I do agree tho that the sets need to be reworked so that every single set is a viable choice, instead of the few that are actually decent enough to use. And regarding that: magicka has more sets to chose from then stamina.

leepalmer95

Why can't sorcs use the fire ones?

Enslaved

teladoy wrote: »

Why there isn't more diversity with the monster sets? the better ones do fire damage or are for stamina users, but sorcerers have really no good sets shock or magic damage, even Templars got some skills that do fire damage but i would say even for them there are not good sets i believe.

Skoria, Grothdarr, Infernal Guardian, Selene, Velidreth these sets are perfect for flame users or stamina. Sorcerers have Molag Kena, Nerien'eth and Iceheart? come on, lets compare these sets with the ones of before and is very clear who wins.

What type of game are we talking about here? Solo PvE? Group PvE? Smallscale PvP or zergfest?
Afaik, for sorcerer that use magicka as fuel, best PvE set is ilambris. Also, you forgot to mention that BiS for stamina in PvE is Kra'gh, in almost every boss situation.

With ones you mentioned as good sets, that is seven in total. Add there tanking sets such are EG, BS, PvP menace known as tumorscale, trollking... 10+ monster sets are viable. I hope 2 new dungeons will give us at least 2 more good monster sets.

teladoy

Enslaved wrote: »

teladoy wrote: »

Why there isn't more diversity with the monster sets? the better ones do fire damage or are for stamina users, but sorcerers have really no good sets shock or magic damage, even Templars got some skills that do fire damage but i would say even for them there are not good sets i believe.

Skoria, Grothdarr, Infernal Guardian, Selene, Velidreth these sets are perfect for flame users or stamina. Sorcerers have Molag Kena, Nerien'eth and Iceheart? come on, lets compare these sets with the ones of before and is very clear who wins.

What type of game are we talking about here? Solo PvE? Group PvE? Smallscale PvP or zergfest?
Afaik, for sorcerer that use magicka as fuel, best PvE set is ilambris. Also, you forgot to mention that BiS for stamina in PvE is Kra'gh, in almost every boss situation.

With ones you mentioned as good sets, that is seven in total. Add there tanking sets such are EG, BS, PvP menace known as tumorscale, trollking... 10+ monster sets are viable. I hope 2 new dungeons will give us at least 2 more good monster sets.

but that set is specially for pve! yes it is very good and strong but for pvp??

leepalmer95 wrote: »

Why can't sorcs use the fire ones?

You've got to be kidding me!! Sorcerers use shock damage and also it looks cool! everything i have does shock damage and think i would never be abble to see my sorcerer throwing fire! ahhhhh!!

Turelus

My issue is more that the one that does the best damage or easiest to proc just becomes the best choice.

You have ones which require dots, but do less damage than ones which is any damage proc. etc.

UrbanMonk

Remove monster sets completely.

Lightspeedflashb14_ESO

I would like a healing monster set that is actually worth using, none of this 3% proc chance or 15 second cool down or healing one at a time, something that heals reliably. Something that would be worth giving up on a second five piece.

Beardimus

What we don't need is any more OP proc bollox in PvP that's for sure

SilverWF

teladoy wrote: »

Why there isn't more diversity with the monster sets? the better ones do fire damage or are for stamina users, but sorcerers have really no good sets shock or magic damage, even Templars got some skills that do fire damage but i would say even for them there are not good sets i believe.

Skoria, Grothdarr, Infernal Guardian, Selene, Velidreth these sets are perfect for flame users or stamina. Sorcerers have Molag Kena, Nerien'eth and Iceheart? come on, lets compare these sets with the ones of before and is very clear who wins.

What?
ILAMBRIS - top PVE set for mag Sorcs. There is literally no alternatives.

DjMuscleboy02

Someone beat me to it but yeah, you forgot literally the only set Magsorcs should be using haha

stevepdodson_ESO888

new Monster Sets incoming with the dungeon DLC

idk

teladoy wrote: »

Why there isn't more diversity with the monster sets? the better ones do fire damage or are for stamina users, but sorcerers have really no good sets shock or magic damage, even Templars got some skills that do fire damage but i would say even for them there are not good sets i believe.

Skoria, Grothdarr, Infernal Guardian, Selene, Velidreth these sets are perfect for flame users or stamina. Sorcerers have Molag Kena, Nerien'eth and Iceheart? come on, lets compare these sets with the ones of before and is very clear who wins.

Ilambris is solid for most sorc builds. Further, the flame damage is stlll boosted for sorcs via CP. Considering Sorcs builds are heavy dots even Skoria would work well. All it would miss out on would be the class passive.

Merlin13KAGL

I'd like to see them drop more than just shoulders from the boxes, with the requirement that only one Monster set be active in a given load out.

This would allow a bit more flexibility in armor choices and not automatically make every shoulder and helm of an otherwise good set virtually useless.

They need to revisit/revamp some of the sets. Bogdan's for instance, which used to be awesome, is now little more than a witch's festival prop.

supaskrub

Hopefully one of the new sets coming with the next dungeon DLC will have mag recovery (1pc) and mag damage (2pc) and be way better than the sorry excuse of Nerien'eth which is the only mag damage set we have at present.

teladoy

supaskrub wrote: »

Hopefully one of the new sets coming with the next dungeon DLC will have mag recovery (1pc) and mag damage (2pc) and be way better than the sorry excuse of Nerien'eth which is the only mag damage set we have at present.

is the Nerien'eth set good for pvp? i don't mean duels, maybe more for Cyro and Bgs.

Right now im using Iceheart because i dont want to use Skoria, but I#m nor sure which one should i use for bgs for example... here i need a help.

Jamini

teladoy wrote: »

supaskrub wrote: »

Hopefully one of the new sets coming with the next dungeon DLC will have mag recovery (1pc) and mag damage (2pc) and be way better than the sorry excuse of Nerien'eth which is the only mag damage set we have at present.

is the Nerien'eth set good for pvp? i don't mean duels, maybe more for Cyro and Bgs.

Right now im using Iceheart because i dont want to use Skoria, but I#m nor sure which one should i use for bgs for example... here i need a help.

No. Nobody gets hit by the lich crystals.

GeorgeBlack

I would like to see a Knightish helm and a big shoulder piece (as big as the Imperial shoulders, Kena).
Enter stats idea

teladoy

Jamini wrote: »

teladoy wrote: »

supaskrub wrote: »

Hopefully one of the new sets coming with the next dungeon DLC will have mag recovery (1pc) and mag damage (2pc) and be way better than the sorry excuse of Nerien'eth which is the only mag damage set we have at present.

is the Nerien'eth set good for pvp? i don't mean duels, maybe more for Cyro and Bgs.

Right now im using Iceheart because i dont want to use Skoria, but I#m nor sure which one should i use for bgs for example... here i need a help.

No. Nobody gets hit by the lich crystals.

Which one can you suggest me then to use in bgs or cyro? (please no flame/fire damage)

Gargath

Merlin13KAGL wrote: »

They need to revisit/revamp some of the sets. Bogdan's for instance, which used to be awesome, is now little more than a witch's festival prop.

Maybe if it gave 10% chance at least, not 3% which is no chance at all