Maintenance for the week of April 6:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – April 6

Staff Tanking Passive

SFDB
SFDB
✭✭✭✭✭
To build off the discussions that have taken place, a question: What if there was a passive for the Destruction Staff line that said "Fully-charged heavy attacks with a destruction staff taunts the enemy to attack you for 15 seconds. While a Destruction Staff equipped, blocking costs magicka instead of stamina"? To allow those who want to use magicka tanking (whether as the primary or on their off-hand) to have more options.
  • AzraelKrieg
    AzraelKrieg
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    There is. Equip a frost staff.
    Gold Dragons Guildmaster PC-NACR2000+
    Kalthar Wolf-Brother – EP Templar - 50 Maeli Valen - EP NB - 50Naps-During-Trials – EP Templar - 50Rulnakh - EP Sorc - 50Azrael Krieg - EP NB – 50Uvithasa Telvanni – EP DK – 50More-Tail - EP Warden - 50Narile Galen - EP Sorc - 50Bone Soldier - EP Necro - 50Naps-During-Trails - EP Necro - 50
  • CaptainBeerDude
    CaptainBeerDude
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I am currently building a warden using this.
  • KochDerDamonen
    KochDerDamonen
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Clearly we should be able to pick which hand a 2H weapon is slotted in primarily. Put a Destruction staff in your 'shield' hand primarily, and you get defensive passives like returning a % of damage taken as fire damage to your foe (fire), creating a defensive shield (lightning), or a passive slow nearby and damage reduction (frost)? All with the 'blocking consumes magicka' part, of course. :p
    If you quote someone, and intend for them to see what you have said, be sure to Mention them with @[insert name].
  • SirCritical
    SirCritical
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    The 'tanking staff' passives need to be adjusted to be at least on par with 1HS passives, or better (since when wearing a staff you lose a setbonus-slot).
  • Phica_Lovic
    Phica_Lovic
    ✭✭✭✭
    SFDB wrote: »
    "Fully-charged heavy attacks with a destruction staff taunts the enemy to attack you for 15 seconds. While a Destruction Staff equipped, blocking costs magicka instead of stamina"?


    There is literally no way that you haven't read the ice staff passives and made the exact thing they do.

    I'm gonna say you forgot when you read this, but I reserve the right to call B.S.
    PAWS (Positively Against Wrip-off Stuff) - Say No to Crown Crates!

    Phica -Max CP - Lvl 50 Argonian Sorc Healer since launch

  • KochDerDamonen
    KochDerDamonen
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    SFDB wrote: »
    "Fully-charged heavy attacks with a destruction staff taunts the enemy to attack you for 15 seconds. While a Destruction Staff equipped, blocking costs magicka instead of stamina"?


    There is literally no way that you haven't read the ice staff passives and made the exact thing they do.

    I'm gonna say you forgot when you read this, but I reserve the right to call B.S.

    @Phica_Lovic I believe this is entirely intentional, and the OP means to say they wish the whole tank/magicka block thing was a seperate optional passive from the elemental affinity. :p
    If you quote someone, and intend for them to see what you have said, be sure to Mention them with @[insert name].
  • SFDB
    SFDB
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    SFDB wrote: »
    "Fully-charged heavy attacks with a destruction staff taunts the enemy to attack you for 15 seconds. While a Destruction Staff equipped, blocking costs magicka instead of stamina"?


    There is literally no way that you haven't read the ice staff passives and made the exact thing they do.

    I'm gonna say you forgot when you read this, but I reserve the right to call B.S.

    The point of it was to simultaneously separate a tanking passive bonus from an otherwise DPS passive while opening up additional options for tanks (perhaps a Sorc tank would want a lightning staff over a frost staff give their class passives).
Sign In or Register to comment.