Why not necro?

idk

KaiVox22 wrote: »

Because what they're originally talking about could be completely outdated and would cause confusion between people, especially those not checking the dates

This is the reason Every 3 months a lot changes.

Sausage

Because...

strikeback1247

bulbousb16_ESO wrote: »

So, not a single reason to date why old threads shouldn't be revived instead of starting new ones.

I ran into an issue recently where there were over a dozen threads on the same topic (getting frozen when being arrested by a guard). Should we REALLY all be starting new threads on the same topic? Is it really a BAD idea to centralize the discussion in a single place? Should we automatically rehash old discussion every time a new person discovers the same old bug?

Why did you necro this thread?

ADarklore

SydneyGrey wrote: »

And you can't win, no matter what you do.
If you necro a thread, you get yelled at for necroing a thread.
If you create a new thread, a million people will immediately jump on to tell you "We already have a thread like this! Use the freaking search function, loser!"
So basically no matter what you do, you're treated like garbage by certain people.

Here is the problem with that... there's a difference between necroing a year-old thread and adding to a thread from a couple weeks or even couple of months ago. The problem is, people creating threads upon threads where just two days ago the same discussion, just last week the same discussions... because they did not bother to SEARCH for the topic because they're too lazy or perhaps just wanted to see their name in 'lights' or something. GOOGLE is your friend and brings up numerous topics, you can filter them by date range (I do this all the time) for most recent information on what you're looking for.

ADarklore

Galwylin wrote: »

Here's the fun part. If someone new asks a question, they're told to search the forum for old posts if people are tired of the subject. If they comment on one, then they've necroed a thread. I really think at the least they should lock them at a certain period of time if they want to keep it available but unable to comment on.

As long as they don't do what EA did and completely remove entire forums full of information and then direct people to use Facebook to discuss games. That was the absolute WORST thing I've ever seen from a gaming company, and shows how GREEDY they are because Facebook is FREE, so they don't have to maintain forum servers or employ several moderators.

Jamascus

If they information is still relevant there is no reason to close it.