Campaign Cheating
Maintenance for the week of March 24:
· [COMPLETE] PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – March 24, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 10:00AM EDT (14:00 UTC)
· Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – March 26, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
· Playstation®: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – March 26, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – March 24, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 10:00AM EDT (14:00 UTC)
· Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – March 26, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
· Playstation®: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – March 26, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
Boradordin
✭✭
Zenimax should, in all honesty, adjust the manner in which toons are gated into a campaign.
Why? Because for some time now players have been playing in Campaign #1 and pulling players from Campaign #2 to join the first campaign. This makes the campaign extremely lopsided. To further frustrate a player, the "bars" when joining a campaign do not reflect the true number of players per faction. At present a player in Campaign #1 can pull players from multiple campaigns, and a full roster of 24, into a campaign. Fine, except that only the first player counts, not the other 23.
There is a very simple solution to the problem, if Zenimax would only listen. The coding would not even be that hard to implement. Redesign the process so that a playe can only join those campaigns as set in his or hers campaign settings per that specific character. In other wors, a character can only join a campaign set as their home or guest campaign. This would also limit the cheating players who are paying guilds large sums of gold to buy a player so he or she can become emperor.
Any comments Zenimax???
Why? Because for some time now players have been playing in Campaign #1 and pulling players from Campaign #2 to join the first campaign. This makes the campaign extremely lopsided. To further frustrate a player, the "bars" when joining a campaign do not reflect the true number of players per faction. At present a player in Campaign #1 can pull players from multiple campaigns, and a full roster of 24, into a campaign. Fine, except that only the first player counts, not the other 23.
There is a very simple solution to the problem, if Zenimax would only listen. The coding would not even be that hard to implement. Redesign the process so that a playe can only join those campaigns as set in his or hers campaign settings per that specific character. In other wors, a character can only join a campaign set as their home or guest campaign. This would also limit the cheating players who are paying guilds large sums of gold to buy a player so he or she can become emperor.
Any comments Zenimax???
1
-
idk✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭How do you determine only 1 person in a 24 man group get counted for hating the campaign? 23 in each group not getting counted?1 -
TequilaFire✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭You only earn score on the leaderboard if it is your home campaign.
If you guest into a campaign you earn ap towards your rank but not the Emperor and leaderboard.
The extra numbers guesting in do give extra firepower to an alliance to take keeps and zerg.
While I don't like it either as long as everyone can do it, it is not cheating.Edited by TequilaFire on December 14, 2016 1:44PM0 -
Curtdogg47✭✭✭✭I think also people should only be allowed to play a campaign on one alliance. If you have toons in multiple alliances they all cannot be in the same campaign.0