Players should know exactly what they are buying and exactly how much it will cost.
DigitalShibby wrote: »Players should know exactly what they are buying and exactly how much it will cost.
They know exactly how many crowns it costs to buy the crates, and they know they're going to receive a random bag of cosmetic items and supplies.
Stop calling it gambling, you're not risking crowns for a chance to make more crowns. You are buying a bag of cosmetic junk for the fun of it and seeing what you get. If you're targeting a specific item that's no ones fault but their own. You don't sit at a blackjack table and freak out when you paid for a hand and didn't get a face card..
Let's move on as a community from the QQ over crates.
DigitalShibby wrote: »Plawyers should know exactly what they are buying and exactly how much it will cost.
They know exactly how many crowns it costs to buy the crates, and they know they're going to receive a random bag of cosmetic items and supplies.
Stop calling it gambling, you're not risking crowns for a chance to make more crowns. You are buying a bag of cosmetic junk for the fun of it and seeing what you get. If you're targeting a specific item that's no ones fault but their own. You don't sit at a blackjack table and freak out when you paid for a hand and didn't get a face card..
Let's move on as a community from the QQ over crates.
It's absolutely gambling, trying to rebrand it won't change the fact. If you can't handle the criticism over their gambling system you're welcome to stop reading it. I can't imagine anyone actually thinks the gambling boxes are a more player-friendly than direct purchases. It's nonsense
DigitalShibby wrote: »DigitalShibby wrote: »Plawyers should know exactly what they are buying and exactly how much it will cost.
They know exactly how many crowns it costs to buy the crates, and they know they're going to receive a random bag of cosmetic items and supplies.
Stop calling it gambling, you're not risking crowns for a chance to make more crowns. You are buying a bag of cosmetic junk for the fun of it and seeing what you get. If you're targeting a specific item that's no ones fault but their own. You don't sit at a blackjack table and freak out when you paid for a hand and didn't get a face card..
Let's move on as a community from the QQ over crates.
It's absolutely gambling, trying to rebrand it won't change the fact. If you can't handle the criticism over their gambling system you're welcome to stop reading it. I can't imagine anyone actually thinks the gambling boxes are a more player-friendly than direct purchases. It's nonsense
Lol you're still missing the point, and again, paying for a random bag for goodies is just that... paying for random goodies. It's a fun addition, we get you dislike it. There are plenty of other threads devoted to crown crate QQ that would love to have you.
DigitalShibby wrote: »DigitalShibby wrote: »Plawyers should know exactly what they are buying and exactly how much it will cost.
They know exactly how many crowns it costs to buy the crates, and they know they're going to receive a random bag of cosmetic items and supplies.
Stop calling it gambling, you're not risking crowns for a chance to make more crowns. You are buying a bag of cosmetic junk for the fun of it and seeing what you get. If you're targeting a specific item that's no ones fault but their own. You don't sit at a blackjack table and freak out when you paid for a hand and didn't get a face card..
Let's move on as a community from the QQ over crates.
It's absolutely gambling, trying to rebrand it won't change the fact. If you can't handle the criticism over their gambling system you're welcome to stop reading it. I can't imagine anyone actually thinks the gambling boxes are a more player-friendly than direct purchases. It's nonsense
Lol you're still missing the point, and again, paying for a random bag for goodies is just that... paying for random goodies. It's a fun addition, we get you dislike it. There are plenty of other threads devoted to crown crate QQ that would love to have you.
DigitalShibby wrote: »DigitalShibby wrote: »Plawyers should know exactly what they are buying and exactly how much it will cost.
They know exactly how many crowns it costs to buy the crates, and they know they're going to receive a random bag of cosmetic items and supplies.
Stop calling it gambling, you're not risking crowns for a chance to make more crowns. You are buying a bag of cosmetic junk for the fun of it and seeing what you get. If you're targeting a specific item that's no ones fault but their own. You don't sit at a blackjack table and freak out when you paid for a hand and didn't get a face card..
Let's move on as a community from the QQ over crates.
It's absolutely gambling, trying to rebrand it won't change the fact. If you can't handle the criticism over their gambling system you're welcome to stop reading it. I can't imagine anyone actually thinks the gambling boxes are a more player-friendly than direct purchases. It's nonsense
Lol you're still missing the point, and again, paying for a random bag for goodies is just that... paying for random goodies. It's a fun addition, we get you dislike it. There are plenty of other threads devoted to crown crate QQ that would love to have you.
Paying money for a random chance at something is the very definition of gambling
DigitalShibby wrote: »DigitalShibby wrote: »DigitalShibby wrote: »Plawyers should know exactly what they are buying and exactly how much it will cost.
They know exactly how many crowns it costs to buy the crates, and they know they're going to receive a random bag of cosmetic items and supplies.
Stop calling it gambling, you're not risking crowns for a chance to make more crowns. You are buying a bag of cosmetic junk for the fun of it and seeing what you get. If you're targeting a specific item that's no ones fault but their own. You don't sit at a blackjack table and freak out when you paid for a hand and didn't get a face card..
Let's move on as a community from the QQ over crates.
It's absolutely gambling, trying to rebrand it won't change the fact. If you can't handle the criticism over their gambling system you're welcome to stop reading it. I can't imagine anyone actually thinks the gambling boxes are a more player-friendly than direct purchases. It's nonsense
Lol you're still missing the point, and again, paying for a random bag for goodies is just that... paying for random goodies. It's a fun addition, we get you dislike it. There are plenty of other threads devoted to crown crate QQ that would love to have you.
Paying money for a random chance at something is the very definition of gambling
Lol again, you're not risking crowns to make more crowns. You are simply buying a random bag of junk. You can use the word as loosely as you'd like, posting on the forum is gambling due to the unknown factor in responses you could receive.
This thread doesn't have to degrade into another crown crate complainers area.
Plenty of other games out there for when the *** starts getting to deep here
I'm not going to stop playing ESO any time soon. I still really like the game, a lot.
I'm not gone today, but I might be gone tomorrow.
TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »With some of these new Atronach mounts and what not it is starting to show that they are running out of Ideas and ESO is quickly derailing off the lorefriendly track.
For example...
- Weird costumes that look completely out of place like 9/10 monster sets for example, some of these newer sets seem to decapitate you when worn if you take a close look at them and don't get me started on the Pumpkin and Scarecrow Morphs.
- Things that shouldn't exist like Black Briar Mead or Corprus Stalkers (They exist in ESO in the DSA despite the fact that Corprus doesn't exist yet because it was made by Dagoth ur but Dagoth Ur has been asleep for thousands of years beneath Red mountain and hasn't created the Blight Yet because he wont wake up until the end of the 2nd era)
- The fact that places exist that shouldn't like Cropsford despite the little fact that the town was founded by the CoC 800 years later, the fact that Anvil looks nearly identical to how it will 800 years after ESO (Llike im to believe that an urban area wont change in 800 Years) The fact there are a LOT of forts missing from Cyrodiil in ESO and none of them have dungeons beneath them (where did they go?) What about the Imperial City being turned the wrong way or the fact that the tallest mountain in Tamriel doesn't even exist in ESO, it is literally right next to Ivarstead in the Rift in Skyrim but in ESO its just not there, I wager if they ever add Solstheim they will probably forget that it used to be mostly forest before the Red Year and instead make it covered in Ash, as for the town of Raven Rock they will probably add that as well despite the fact the town was literally founded by the Nerevarine, before they got there the land was nothing but boulders and Trees.
- Ghosts walking among the living in camps where soliders are in the Rift, Ghosts are lost souls trapped on Nirn against their will not party animals and the Portal to Sovngarde is supposed to be a secret.
I do fear for this game and what it has become, it isn't the same game that I first played over 2 years ago.
So you think Corprus creatures existing during the 2nd era is lore friendly do you? what about Black-Briar Mead or the Town of Cropsford?TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »With some of these new Atronach mounts and what not it is starting to show that they are running out of Ideas and ESO is quickly derailing off the lorefriendly track.
For example...
- Weird costumes that look completely out of place like 9/10 monster sets for example, some of these newer sets seem to decapitate you when worn if you take a close look at them and don't get me started on the Pumpkin and Scarecrow Morphs.
- Things that shouldn't exist like Black Briar Mead or Corprus Stalkers (They exist in ESO in the DSA despite the fact that Corprus doesn't exist yet because it was made by Dagoth ur but Dagoth Ur has been asleep for thousands of years beneath Red mountain and hasn't created the Blight Yet because he wont wake up until the end of the 2nd era)
- The fact that places exist that shouldn't like Cropsford despite the little fact that the town was founded by the CoC 800 years later, the fact that Anvil looks nearly identical to how it will 800 years after ESO (Llike im to believe that an urban area wont change in 800 Years) The fact there are a LOT of forts missing from Cyrodiil in ESO and none of them have dungeons beneath them (where did they go?) What about the Imperial City being turned the wrong way or the fact that the tallest mountain in Tamriel doesn't even exist in ESO, it is literally right next to Ivarstead in the Rift in Skyrim but in ESO its just not there, I wager if they ever add Solstheim they will probably forget that it used to be mostly forest before the Red Year and instead make it covered in Ash, as for the town of Raven Rock they will probably add that as well despite the fact the town was literally founded by the Nerevarine, before they got there the land was nothing but boulders and Trees.
- Ghosts walking among the living in camps where soliders are in the Rift, Ghosts are lost souls trapped on Nirn against their will not party animals and the Portal to Sovngarde is supposed to be a secret.
I do fear for this game and what it has become, it isn't the same game that I first played over 2 years ago.
I think it's extremely lore friendly. I'd like more but then I'd also like people using roads and not fighting in the wood shop. Its appealing to people that just see it as a game. Your lore requests don't seem unreasonable but a lot of players probably don't care that much. You know its a whole different world when Imperials look like Roman soldiers and apparently will look like Romans for generations. So, the game world isn't exactly as things should be. I think the Roman Empire lasted 1000 years but if you look at in the beginning and when it ended, there were some significant changes which don't seem to happen in Tamriel. So, those things that shouldn't exist are just flavoring for players. I don't think they really exist within the actual fictional setting itself. They're just player fluff. That's not running out of ideas. Its just giving players their own distinct Tamriel image. And with it being a game, there's no reason they can't bring that mountain out at some point. ESO operates first as a game then as setting. Sometimes the setting isn't going to jive with the world's history. But overall, it feels like a distinct world. I don't see it as absolute will be in the timeline of all Elder Scroll lore. It just can't.