PrinceFabious wrote: »I like all these changes!
My soul gem is ready ghost.Dang, troll bait fail. Guess I shouldn't had stated I didn't support those changes but hope the message got across that a lot of overperforming stam DD builds are upset that many magicka builds aren't squishy light armor users anymore and aren't getting 2-shot.
Nevermind, ghost joins the arena.
j.murro2ub17_ESO wrote: »Really good changes, I think ZOS should consider them.
My soul gem is ready ghost.Dang, troll bait fail. Guess I shouldn't had stated I didn't support those changes but hope the message got across that a lot of overperforming stam DD builds are upset that many magicka builds aren't squishy light armor users anymore and aren't getting 2-shot.
Nevermind, ghost joins the arena.
Forestd16b14_ESO wrote: »Funny how the list is mostly stamina base skills...... So this is a nerf stamina thread ? Got it... how about a nerf to Meteor and damage shields ? Maybe nerf healing instead or how about a nerf to crystal frags and flame lash ? I know nerf magicak in general no magicka regen while a damage shield is active after all stamina users don't have stamina regen when blocking.
This hasn't yielded nearly enough salt. I basically called out of every 1vXer stam build on how overperforming stam builds are and how they constantly complain about things on the forums asking for nerfs to things that prevent them from being able to 1vX but haven't pulled any aggro.
This hasn't yielded nearly enough salt. I basically called out of every 1vXer stam build on how overperforming stam builds are and how they constantly complain about things on the forums asking for nerfs to things that prevent them from being able to 1vX but haven't pulled any aggro.
Youll trigger them better if you get the herd to start agreeing on something so they all start posting, then say something they disagree with and watch the magic.
Its difficult to get the first one to join the thread with a disagreement, they arent sure if the others will follow and dont want to be the only one in here.
We get it we get it.... Another "I've been killed by a nightblade so much tonight plz halph" thread.
This hasn't yielded nearly enough salt. I basically called out of every 1vXer stam build on how overperforming stam builds are and how they constantly complain about things on the forums asking for nerfs to things that prevent them from being able to 1vX but haven't pulled any aggro.
Youll trigger them better if you get the herd to start agreeing on something so they all start posting, then say something they disagree with and watch the magic.
Its difficult to get the first one to join the thread with a disagreement, they arent sure if the others will follow and dont want to be the only one in here.
Thanks for the tip! I don't usually participate in forum PVP but after the 14th day in a row about radiant destruction and malubeth but no similar threat about dawnbreaker of smiting or roll dodge, I figured I'd bring some "balance" to the discussion.
This hasn't yielded nearly enough salt. I basically called out of every 1vXer stam build on how overperforming stam builds are and how they constantly complain about things on the forums asking for nerfs to things that prevent them from being able to 1vX but haven't pulled any aggro.
Youll trigger them better if you get the herd to start agreeing on something so they all start posting, then say something they disagree with and watch the magic.
Its difficult to get the first one to join the thread with a disagreement, they arent sure if the others will follow and dont want to be the only one in here.
Thanks for the tip! I don't usually participate in forum PVP but after the 14th day in a row about radiant destruction and malubeth but no similar threat about dawnbreaker of smiting or roll dodge, I figured I'd bring some "balance" to the discussion.
14 days? Try 6 months young'un. I never spent so much time defending a skill i barely used until the knee jerk nerf calls under a banner of misguided balance. Do it for another few weeks and you'll get a button saying 'forumplar' to stick on your jacket
I don't care wether there are nerfs or buffs, but as far as I'm concerned I see a line with Magplar and all stam builds on one side, and every other magicka class on the other. And id like to see that gap closed. That and nerfing malubeth would be my personal priorities balance wise right now.
I don't care wether there are nerfs or buffs, but as far as I'm concerned I see a line with Magplar and all stam builds on one side, and every other magicka class on the other. And id like to see that gap closed. That and nerfing malubeth would be my personal priorities balance wise right now.
By that logic then you would need to nerf all stam builds and magplar, OR buff magsorc, magdk, and magblade. The latter group actually has more group utility than stam builds for raids but the former group shines more in a smaller scale engagements.
I don't care wether there are nerfs or buffs, but as far as I'm concerned I see a line with Magplar and all stam builds on one side, and every other magicka class on the other. And id like to see that gap closed. That and nerfing malubeth would be my personal priorities balance wise right now.
By that logic then you would need to nerf all stam builds and magplar, OR buff magsorc, magdk, and magblade. The latter group actually has more group utility than stam builds for raids but the former group shines more in a smaller scale engagements.
A 24 man organized raid of stam things and magplars versus a 24 man raid of magicka sorcs and DKs and mageblades. Skill held equal, my money is on the former. Stam means greater damage, magplars mean...magplars, and all classes present means identical utility.