Lucius_Aelius wrote: »It does seem like a pretty straightforward suggestion, but then things aren't always as simple as they appear. The one major issue I see is the same one that cropped up in the transfers from PC to console, where friends sent each other all their gold (everyone giving it to one person) so that they could transfer their accounts one by one to the console and then send all the gold to the next friend in line.
So if each friend on PC had 1 million Gold and there were ten friends, and each friend was given all the Gold at the time they made the transfer, then each friend would end up with 10 million Gold on Console. And with PC transfers still in place, if they just added Console transfers then you could have a bunch of friends transfer over and over between the systems and multiply their Gold every time they do it.
There definitely needs to be some kind of limiting factor to stop people from doing that, and it's likely to prove quite difficult to devise and implement. So even if it's potentially doable, there's little doubt that it would neither be easy nor straightforward at all.
pecheckler wrote: »Lucius_Aelius wrote: »It does seem like a pretty straightforward suggestion, but then things aren't always as simple as they appear. The one major issue I see is the same one that cropped up in the transfers from PC to console, where friends sent each other all their gold (everyone giving it to one person) so that they could transfer their accounts one by one to the console and then send all the gold to the next friend in line.
So if each friend on PC had 1 million Gold and there were ten friends, and each friend was given all the Gold at the time they made the transfer, then each friend would end up with 10 million Gold on Console. And with PC transfers still in place, if they just added Console transfers then you could have a bunch of friends transfer over and over between the systems and multiply their Gold every time they do it.
There definitely needs to be some kind of limiting factor to stop people from doing that, and it's likely to prove quite difficult to devise and implement. So even if it's potentially doable, there's little doubt that it would neither be easy nor straightforward at all.
That's why I used the word account "move", not "copy".