Maintenance for the week of December 16:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – December 16
• NA megaservers for patch maintenance – December 17, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
• EU megaservers for patch maintenance – December 17, 9:00 UTC (4:00AM EST) - 17:00 UTC (12:00PM EST)
The issues on the North American megaservers have been resolved at this time. If you continue to experience difficulties at login, please restart your client. Thank you for your patience!

The State of Malubeth

Sandman929
Sandman929
✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭
@ZOS_JessicaFolsom @ZOS_AnyoneElse I'm currently running this set on a Mag NB Tank in PvP, no major mending and I don't see any ridiculous healing ticks so far but it's a very nice tanking set. So I was wondering if this is OFFICIALLY considered "fixed"?

I see a lot of people complaining about it, and it sat in my bank for quite awhile but now that I've seen the set officially called out for getting a patch fix, I'd like to know if it's working as intended.
  • Rohamad_Ali
    Rohamad_Ali
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    It over performs on Templars and classes with high healing abilities .
  • Xvorg
    Xvorg
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    It over performs on Templars and classes with high healing abilities .

    It's the only way to play an argonian
    Sarcasm is something too serious to be taken lightly

    I was born with the wrong sign
    In the wrong house
    With the wrong ascendancy
    I took the wrong road
    That led to the wrong tendencies
    I was in the wrong place at the wrong time
    For the wrong reason and the wrong rhyme
    On the wrong day of the wrong week
    Used the wrong method with the wrong technique
  • Cathexis
    Cathexis
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Its the only way to play a stam based sorc tank.
    Tome of Alteration Magic I - Reality is an Ancient Dwemer Construct: Everything You Need to Know About FPS
    https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/520903/tomb-of-fps-alteration-magic-everything-you-need-to-know-about-fps

    Tome of Alteration Magic II - The Manual of the Deceiver: A Beginner's Guide to Thieving
    https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/462509/tome-of-alteration-mastery-ii-the-decievers-manual-thieving-guide-for-new-characters

    Ultrawide ESO Adventure Screenshots - 7680 x 1080 Resolution
    https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/505262/adventures-in-ultra-ultrawide-an-ongoing-series
  • Sandman929
    Sandman929
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    It works very well for a Sap Tank as well, since everything I do is a self heal. I was just hoping to see something official because it's hard to distinguish if something is legitimately broken or if it's just whining from people who don't like it.



  • Mojomonkeyman
    Mojomonkeyman
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Go solo a boss in ic districts with malu and rewatch your heal logs after. You will notice strange things. This set works so "well" because it is broken. Using it now after knowledge is spread is not different than exploiting multiple mundus stones or such, imo.
    Koma Grey, Chocolate Thunder, Little Mojo, Dagoth Mojo & Mojomancy
  • Gilliamtherogue
    Gilliamtherogue
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    The issue isn't Malubeth by itself. Just putting it on you don't see anything that makes you think, "Hey this is pretty toxic!". The issue is the potential scaling of the set, since the 30% bonus healing stacks with every single other healing buff in the game where it becomes absolutely absurd.
    Old member of The Order of Mundus, Mostly Harmless, Hostile, and Genesis Elite. Avid theorycrafter. Herald to competitive stamina DPS pre 1.5. How far we've come!

    Have questions? Send me a message on the forums or my other social media. Seeing people learn is my dream and passion.

    Guides and other fun videos at https://youtube.com/c/gilliamtherogue
  • Sandman929
    Sandman929
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Go solo a boss in ic districts with malu and rewatch your heal logs after. You will notice strange things. This set works so "well" because it is broken. Using it now after knowledge is spread is not different than exploiting multiple mundus stones or such, imo.

    Agreed, which is why I'm trying to figure out the extent of the break. I've seen several accounts ranging from "it's broken with Templars", "it's broken when used with Major Mending", and "it's not broken at all".

    ZOS stated an issue was "fixed", is the set then considered fixed?
  • Mojomonkeyman
    Mojomonkeyman
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well, I bouhgt it on sunday to test, soloed my first boss that day with newly acquired Malu and out of the first 5 malu procs 2 happened to tick with 7k (each malu tick) additionally to boosted vigor...

    That`s broken, I don`t care for anything more than my own testing.
    Edited by Mojomonkeyman on July 12, 2016 6:29PM
    Koma Grey, Chocolate Thunder, Little Mojo, Dagoth Mojo & Mojomancy
  • olsborg
    olsborg
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    It proccs far too often, from dots and direct hits. It heals way too much (broken) and needs to be looked at. Currently half of the players in cyrodiil is using it, if not more, wich clearly sais something is off about it aswell

    PC EU
    PvP only
  • Sandman929
    Sandman929
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    olsborg wrote: »
    It proccs far too often, from dots and direct hits. It heals way too much (broken) and needs to be looked at. Currently half of the players in cyrodiil is using it, if not more, wich clearly sais something is off about it aswell

    One could start a rumor about Deaths Wind being the new OP set and half of Cyrodiil would head to the crafting station. I care about my own testing as well, and I've seen nothing to indicate a problem as a magicka NB. I was hoping that some official word had been printed somewhere about the performance or over-performance of the set. Barring that I've got to place trust in the word of forum members who are far too prone to calling for various nerfs.
  • Pallio
    Pallio
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Working as intended.

    Luckily I am an Argonian Templar with this and Jesus Beam, so swimming through the tears on this forum is much easier.
  • Eclipse0990
    Eclipse0990
    ✭✭✭
    I'm not sure if it's still broken. I use it on my templar after the "fixed" statement from zos and not before. So I don't have any means to compare from before. Though sometimes it does proc a lot of time. But it's mostly when I'm up against loads of enemies. (6% anyone?)
    Raid leader for Undead Nuns (DC-EU-KaalWhaterveritscallednowdays)
  • Sandman929
    Sandman929
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    With the size of the thumb currently tipping the scales toward stam builds and high damage, I'm inclined to keep using it until it's officially a set that is acknowledged as being broken and being "looked into".
    It's hard to turn away a chance at extra healing received as a sap tank when statements about it being broken come from potential opponents only.
  • Sandman929
    Sandman929
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    If ZOS says it's not working right, back in the bank it goes.
  • leepalmer95
    leepalmer95
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sandman929 wrote: »
    If ZOS says it's not working right, back in the bank it goes.

    Zos won't say everything, when most players acknowledge it's broken, this it's brokenly OP.

    PS4 EU DC

    Current CP : 756+

    I have every character level 50, both a magicka and stamina version.


    RIP my effort to get 5x v16 characters...
  • JubJub
    JubJub
    ✭✭✭
    Sandman929 wrote: »
    If ZOS says it's not working right, back in the bank it goes.

    Zos won't say everything, when most players acknowledge it's broken, this it's brokenly OP.

    Yep anything I lose to I'll call broken.
  • maxjapank
    maxjapank
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    I'm not sure if it's still broken. I use it on my templar after the "fixed" statement from zos and not before. So I don't have any means to compare from before. Though sometimes it does proc a lot of time. But it's mostly when I'm up against loads of enemies. (6% anyone?)

    Same for me. People have hopped on the bandwagon about it being broken. But most haven't even experienced it being broken for themselves. But anyways, once they get this nerfed, they will move on to Bloodspawn or Engine Guardian next. The nerfwagon is neverending.
  • GreenSoup2HoT
    GreenSoup2HoT
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Working as intended....

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRUKKpYepdc

    Just wanna state that this is a good showcase of SAP tanking on a magicka nightblade. In the video though you will see some pretty ridiculous healing ticks coming from Malubeth (mostly 5.5-7.5k none crit's).


    Edited by GreenSoup2HoT on July 13, 2016 1:44AM
    PS4 NA DC
  • Wycks
    Wycks
    ✭✭✭✭
    Expect a fix in 6 months when a whole new slew of bugs are introduced during the patch.
    The numbers thing is always going to be there, but it’s more down to player skill and there are ways through ability choice to configure a group to be stronger vs. large groups of people. - BRAIN WHEELER - 2012 - LOL
  • Sandman929
    Sandman929
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Working as intended....

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRUKKpYepdc

    Just wanna state that this is a good showcase of SAP tanking on a magicka nightblade. In the video though you will see some pretty ridiculous healing ticks coming from Malubeth (mostly 5.5-7.5k none crit's).


    That is pretty compelling, and on console as well. I don't know that this is after the official "fix", but I will start looking at replacements for the set now.
    One would think there are enough Malubeth posts for some official comment about the set, but apparently addressing concerns is too much for ZOS to handle at the moment.
  • Niastissa
    Niastissa
    ✭✭✭
    My guild beat him several weeks ago. He wasn't too difficult and gives a nice golden purple color for your dyes. :smiley:
  • Sandman929
    Sandman929
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    With Vitality pots up, which I always have, wouldn't 6-7k procs be expected? Any other healing received buffs would push the number even higher. People can say it's proccing too often but 6% chance isn't a guarantee that exactly 6 of 100 hits will proc the beam, every hit has a 6% chance. There are no "ticks" from the set, just the initial heal from the proc and the increased healing received, and as a sap tank I receive quite a bit of healing.

    Just say something ZOS!
  • Sandman929
    Sandman929
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    maxjapank wrote: »
    I'm not sure if it's still broken. I use it on my templar after the "fixed" statement from zos and not before. So I don't have any means to compare from before. Though sometimes it does proc a lot of time. But it's mostly when I'm up against loads of enemies. (6% anyone?)

    Same for me. People have hopped on the bandwagon about it being broken. But most haven't even experienced it being broken for themselves. But anyways, once they get this nerfed, they will move on to Bloodspawn or Engine Guardian next. The nerfwagon is neverending.

    That's sort of what this outcry feels like to me too. People expect a 6% chance to be a rare thing and large heals when the set procs are determined by many factors. Was major vitality up on the player? How much is their healing received buffed by armor choices? Racial choice? Blessed CP? Quick Recovery? Heavy armor? Did it proc twice with the second proc getting buffed by the first?

    Large proc heals aren't necessarily a sign of a broken set.
  • raasdal
    raasdal
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sandman929 wrote: »
    With Vitality pots up, which I always have, wouldn't 6-7k procs be expected? Any other healing received buffs would push the number even higher. People can say it's proccing too often but 6% chance isn't a guarantee that exactly 6 of 100 hits will proc the beam, every hit has a 6% chance. There are no "ticks" from the set, just the initial heal from the proc and the increased healing received, and as a sap tank I receive quite a bit of healing.

    Just say something ZOS!

    Malubeth does not deliver the "initial heal" in one portion immediately. It delivers it as ticks every second, half second or whatever, over the 5 sec. duration of the beam (or thereabouts). If you run any kind of addon this will be quite obvious.

    I too have a Stam DK using Vitality Pots. I have about 1-2k ticks when they crit.

    When people are reporting 6-7k ticks, this means that the entire heal from the set, will be something like 30-40k healing, as it ticks at least 4-5 times.

    In my time using the set, i have never seen it tick for anything out of the ordinary. Except for when i am at full health, at which point you cannot trust any numbers you see. I have had a Burning Embers heal me for 20K while at full health. Right... I am suspecting alot of these reported ticks are display errors, and are not actual trueheals.
    PC - EU
    Gromag Gro-Molag - Sorcerer - EP
    Dexion Velus - Dragonknight - AD
    Chalaux Erissa - Nightblade - AD
    Firiel Erissa - Templar - AD
  • Sandman929
    Sandman929
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    raasdal wrote: »
    Sandman929 wrote: »
    With Vitality pots up, which I always have, wouldn't 6-7k procs be expected? Any other healing received buffs would push the number even higher. People can say it's proccing too often but 6% chance isn't a guarantee that exactly 6 of 100 hits will proc the beam, every hit has a 6% chance. There are no "ticks" from the set, just the initial heal from the proc and the increased healing received, and as a sap tank I receive quite a bit of healing.

    Just say something ZOS!

    Malubeth does not deliver the "initial heal" in one portion immediately. It delivers it as ticks every second, half second or whatever, over the 5 sec. duration of the beam (or thereabouts). If you run any kind of addon this will be quite obvious.

    I too have a Stam DK using Vitality Pots. I have about 1-2k ticks when they crit.

    When people are reporting 6-7k ticks, this means that the entire heal from the set, will be something like 30-40k healing, as it ticks at least 4-5 times.

    In my time using the set, i have never seen it tick for anything out of the ordinary. Except for when i am at full health, at which point you cannot trust any numbers you see. I have had a Burning Embers heal me for 20K while at full health. Right... I am suspecting alot of these reported ticks are display errors, and are not actual trueheals.

    The description of the set says nothing about heals over time.
  • Sandman929
    Sandman929
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    In practice, I see a large heal when the beam procs...and that's it if I'm not receiving other healing from myself or others.
  • Sandman929
    Sandman929
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Admittedly, on a console I don't have access to that kind of resolution into the numbers.
  • FENGRUSH
    FENGRUSH
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    Cathexis wrote: »
    Its the only way to play a stam based sorc tank.

    Stam sorc tank gets along quite well without malubeth actually!
  • raasdal
    raasdal
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sandman929 wrote: »
    raasdal wrote: »
    Sandman929 wrote: »
    With Vitality pots up, which I always have, wouldn't 6-7k procs be expected? Any other healing received buffs would push the number even higher. People can say it's proccing too often but 6% chance isn't a guarantee that exactly 6 of 100 hits will proc the beam, every hit has a 6% chance. There are no "ticks" from the set, just the initial heal from the proc and the increased healing received, and as a sap tank I receive quite a bit of healing.

    Just say something ZOS!

    Malubeth does not deliver the "initial heal" in one portion immediately. It delivers it as ticks every second, half second or whatever, over the 5 sec. duration of the beam (or thereabouts). If you run any kind of addon this will be quite obvious.

    I too have a Stam DK using Vitality Pots. I have about 1-2k ticks when they crit.

    When people are reporting 6-7k ticks, this means that the entire heal from the set, will be something like 30-40k healing, as it ticks at least 4-5 times.

    In my time using the set, i have never seen it tick for anything out of the ordinary. Except for when i am at full health, at which point you cannot trust any numbers you see. I have had a Burning Embers heal me for 20K while at full health. Right... I am suspecting alot of these reported ticks are display errors, and are not actual trueheals.

    The description of the set says nothing about heals over time.

    Never ever ever ever never trust the tooltip description. Ever. Never.
    PC - EU
    Gromag Gro-Molag - Sorcerer - EP
    Dexion Velus - Dragonknight - AD
    Chalaux Erissa - Nightblade - AD
    Firiel Erissa - Templar - AD
  • Sandman929
    Sandman929
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    raasdal wrote: »
    Sandman929 wrote: »
    raasdal wrote: »
    Sandman929 wrote: »
    With Vitality pots up, which I always have, wouldn't 6-7k procs be expected? Any other healing received buffs would push the number even higher. People can say it's proccing too often but 6% chance isn't a guarantee that exactly 6 of 100 hits will proc the beam, every hit has a 6% chance. There are no "ticks" from the set, just the initial heal from the proc and the increased healing received, and as a sap tank I receive quite a bit of healing.

    Just say something ZOS!

    Malubeth does not deliver the "initial heal" in one portion immediately. It delivers it as ticks every second, half second or whatever, over the 5 sec. duration of the beam (or thereabouts). If you run any kind of addon this will be quite obvious.

    I too have a Stam DK using Vitality Pots. I have about 1-2k ticks when they crit.

    When people are reporting 6-7k ticks, this means that the entire heal from the set, will be something like 30-40k healing, as it ticks at least 4-5 times.

    In my time using the set, i have never seen it tick for anything out of the ordinary. Except for when i am at full health, at which point you cannot trust any numbers you see. I have had a Burning Embers heal me for 20K while at full health. Right... I am suspecting alot of these reported ticks are display errors, and are not actual trueheals.

    The description of the set says nothing about heals over time.

    Never ever ever ever never trust the tooltip description. Ever. Never.

    How about the numbers on my screen?
Sign In or Register to comment.