Bfish22090 wrote: »stam sorcs are in a great spot and currently second as far as stam classes go
Averya_Teira wrote: »Bfish22090 wrote: »stam sorcs are in a great spot and currently second as far as stam classes go
On what planet are stam sorcs better than stam DK,NB and stamplars lol ?
jwilkins66ub17_ESO wrote: »Averya_Teira wrote: »Bfish22090 wrote: »stam sorcs are in a great spot and currently second as far as stam classes go
On what planet are stam sorcs better than stam DK,NB and stamplars lol ?
Exactly^^ Where in the world could it even possibly be imagined. smh.
I hate to say it but I could see @Wrobel having a personal anti-bully vendetta against Fengrush and his in your face not so graceful approach to requesting changes and the end result is No fix for Stam Sorcs screwing the rest of us. I don't applaud his methods, being over 45 years old and knowing exactly how they would be perceived by a "Company" that won't tolerate "perceived bullying behavior" even if it's spot on and correct in the content talked about.
I may be off base and that's ok. Both of those guys obviously have very thick skin and will likely lol at this perception some of us have. but it needed to be said.
Bfish22090 wrote: »stam sorcs are in a great spot and currently second as far as stam classes go
andypappb16_ESO wrote: »If they finally rework Bound Armaments, giving it a active Ability or something along the lines, then yes, Stam Sorc is finally in a good state.
Im more concerned with the Magicka Sorc and the class abilities to be honest.
5K/heal ? That's 4k5 per critted heal in pve, halved to 2k25 in pvp (without cp in rapid regen/blessed). Most of the time that's a 1k5 heal/second, and only if you put enough dots on your target. This heal can help, but in this burst meta it's not enough.
The major brutality buff boost your weapon damage by 20%, not your overall damage. It's more a 6-8% increase in most build. Moreover, DK have the same boost (and they share it to the group, along with the minor buff) and rally give both more heal (more reliable and a burst component) and the same buff. In comparison, surge is still behind rally.
The 2% weapon damage is less than the fighter's guild passive, and the fighter's guild skill are for the most of them better than sorc skill. Dawnbreaker, silver shard, camo hunter and trap beast are or can be really powerful in pvp, when most sorc skill aren't even useful or too situational. And sorc skill cost far more, or take 2-3 slots…
Stamsorc are good in aoe situation but nearly only because of their passive. They are also the king of stamina solo play, as magsorc were before DB. But this game is NOT about solo play only, we can't say "this class is good for solo, so it's fine".
Averya_Teira wrote: »jwilkins66ub17_ESO wrote: »Averya_Teira wrote: »Bfish22090 wrote: »stam sorcs are in a great spot and currently second as far as stam classes go
On what planet are stam sorcs better than stam DK,NB and stamplars lol ?
Exactly^^ Where in the world could it even possibly be imagined. smh.
I hate to say it but I could see @Wrobel having a personal anti-bully vendetta against Fengrush and his in your face not so graceful approach to requesting changes and the end result is No fix for Stam Sorcs screwing the rest of us. I don't applaud his methods, being over 45 years old and knowing exactly how they would be perceived by a "Company" that won't tolerate "perceived bullying behavior" even if it's spot on and correct in the content talked about.
I may be off base and that's ok. Both of those guys obviously have very thick skin and will likely lol at this perception some of us have. but it needed to be said.
Imho, I really think @Wrobel doesn't play the game with the stuff he sometimes says. Stam sorc crit based tanks? Really? He thinks that'd be an effective and reliable tank? Surely not with the new CD of surge anyway lol...
byrdmanwes wrote: »Averya_Teira wrote: »jwilkins66ub17_ESO wrote: »Averya_Teira wrote: »Bfish22090 wrote: »stam sorcs are in a great spot and currently second as far as stam classes go
On what planet are stam sorcs better than stam DK,NB and stamplars lol ?
Exactly^^ Where in the world could it even possibly be imagined. smh.
I hate to say it but I could see @Wrobel having a personal anti-bully vendetta against Fengrush and his in your face not so graceful approach to requesting changes and the end result is No fix for Stam Sorcs screwing the rest of us. I don't applaud his methods, being over 45 years old and knowing exactly how they would be perceived by a "Company" that won't tolerate "perceived bullying behavior" even if it's spot on and correct in the content talked about.
I may be off base and that's ok. Both of those guys obviously have very thick skin and will likely lol at this perception some of us have. but it needed to be said.
Imho, I really think @Wrobel doesn't play the game with the stuff he sometimes says. Stam sorc crit based tanks? Really? He thinks that'd be an effective and reliable tank? Surely not with the new CD of surge anyway lol...
Actually I have a stamina sorc tank. It is viable. I do vet wgt and icp without a healer on a regular basis even before db update. With the db update the sustainability is ridiculously fun.
i feel hurricane should last alittle longer, by the time you get to stage 3 your close to needing a refresh anyways, and surge heals need to be doubled for them to be reliable enough for sustain.
possibly give bound armaments a passive 5% healing intake on top of current bonuses? or reduce magicka costs by 10%, because i actually like it's a toggle but it's not doing enough to be vital for stam especially since it takes up a slot on 2/3 bars.
the weapon damage passive needs to be increased alittle since fighters guild surpasses it.
pets need to have more hp and scale with stam+weapon damage as well.
Dark Deal needs to be a 0.5 cast to be worth it, or double the returns to be worth risking your neck.