Maintenance for the week of January 5:
· [COMPLETE] NA megaservers for maintenance – January 7, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 10:00AM EST (15:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] EU megaservers for maintenance – January 7, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 10:00AM EST (15:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] NA megaservers for maintenance – January 7, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 10:00AM EST (15:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] EU megaservers for maintenance – January 7, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 10:00AM EST (15:00 UTC)
[BUG] PURGE ALWAYS HITTING SAME SIX
-
Zheg✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭Crispen_Longbow wrote: »HoloYoitsu wrote: »
2 V 1 = Zerg
3 V 2 = Zerg
4 V 3 = Zerg
8 V 6 = Zerg
16 V 14 = Zerg
24 v 24 = Zerg
48 v 36 = Zerg
Anytime outnumbered or even same numbers ESO Players will think "Zerg"
Actually, according to JDar, 5 v ~8 blues is a zerg as well, as per our 5 man group pushing a blue keep one night and 'ruining pvp'.
Was that when we got into Roe and were told that we attacked an "empty" keep with "30"?
Indeed. What's hilarious is that we all know there are many, many more that are challenged when it comes to counting. It might be why they rely on 10 minute long FTC parses as validation for when they die. "I fought 219 people and was zerged down!"
On the purge thing though, I wonder if it's always acted this way but no one noticed when the cap was at 20.Edited by Zheg on June 16, 2016 11:13PM2 -
Junipus✭✭✭✭✭dap_robertb16_ESO wrote: »A zerg is the number of people required to kill you, plus one.
ZOS' response to this will be "it's hitting 6 so it's working as intended" followed by thread locking and scampering away like banekins.
At least if more people see this fewer healers will get yelled atThe Legendary Nothing2 -
Mako1132✭✭✭✭✭Crispen_Longbow wrote: »HoloYoitsu wrote: »
2 V 1 = Zerg
3 V 2 = Zerg
4 V 3 = Zerg
8 V 6 = Zerg
16 V 14 = Zerg
24 v 24 = Zerg
48 v 36 = Zerg
Anytime outnumbered or even same numbers ESO Players will think "Zerg"
Actually, according to JDar, 5 v ~8 blues is a zerg as well, as per our 5 man group pushing a blue keep one night and 'ruining pvp'.
Was that when we got into Roe and were told that we attacked an "empty" keep with "30"?
Indeed. What's hilarious is that we all know there are many, many more that are challenged when it comes to counting. It might be why they rely on 10 minute long FTC parses as validation for when they die. "I fought 219 people and was zerged down!"
On the purge thing though, I wonder if it's always acted this way but no one noticed when the cap was at 20.
@Satiar +1021 -
FENGRUSH✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭HoloYoitsu wrote: »
Ya, youre OK at 6. Once you hit 7 youre zerging the campaign.0 -
Zheg✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭Crispen_Longbow wrote: »HoloYoitsu wrote: »
2 V 1 = Zerg
3 V 2 = Zerg
4 V 3 = Zerg
8 V 6 = Zerg
16 V 14 = Zerg
24 v 24 = Zerg
48 v 36 = Zerg
Anytime outnumbered or even same numbers ESO Players will think "Zerg"
Actually, according to JDar, 5 v ~8 blues is a zerg as well, as per our 5 man group pushing a blue keep one night and 'ruining pvp'.
Was that when we got into Roe and were told that we attacked an "empty" keep with "30"?
Indeed. What's hilarious is that we all know there are many, many more that are challenged when it comes to counting. It might be why they rely on 10 minute long FTC parses as validation for when they die. "I fought 219 people and was zerged down!"
On the purge thing though, I wonder if it's always acted this way but no one noticed when the cap was at 20.
@Satiar +102
Counting challenged confirmed. The alliteration is free of charge.1 -
heystreethawk✭✭✭✭✭Gross. Any testing on Cleanse?GM of Fantasia
I heard those symphonies come quick2 -
Capsaica✭✭✭heystreethawk wrote: »Gross. Any testing on Cleanse?
One might assume it would act the same. But then...assuming with ZOS is just stupid.
Also curious if it might act differently in PvE instances such as trials. Do you have the same 1st 6 in group dependency in an instanced trial? In non-instanced PvE?0 -
Sotha_Sil✭✭✭✭✭
✭This needs fixing like... NOW!Restoration is a perfectly valid school of magic, and don't let anyone tell you otherwise! - Spells and incantations for those with the talent to cast them!1 -
MLRPZ✭✭✭✭✭@ZOS_GinaBruno : can we at least know if you're aware of that plox ?AD // Marc the Epic Goat // Templar // AR50
EP // The Goatfather // Templar // AR44
AD // Unforgoatable // Sorc // AR33
EP // You Goat Rekt // NB // AR28
EP // Bill Goats // Swarden // AR28
AD // Goat Ya // NB // AR24
AD // Unforgoatten // StamDK // AR 21
DC // Egoatcentric // Stamsorc // AR16
and many unused PVE chars
REMOVE FACTION LOCKAoE RatsRIP Zerg SquadRIP Banana Squad IncNot your typical goat0 -
Akgurd✭✭✭heystreethawk wrote: »Gross. Any testing on Cleanse?
Cleanse fails the same.
Fails same way in pve zones too.Edited by Akgurd on June 19, 2016 4:39AMAknight2 -
Astanphaeus✭✭✭✭✭HoloYoitsu wrote: »
He did, he's a DK now.Astanphaeus wrote: »
Honestly, I'm just saying stuff until ZOS responds. It's ridiculous that they haven't at least acknowledged the bug by now.0 -
Akgurd✭✭✭Just updating the recent findings.
Once you relog or disconnect, the priority switches to next person in the line. It's so darn hard to control who gets the purge in your group...
Aknight2 -
_Chaos✭✭✭✭✭
✭ZOS_JessicaFolsom wrote: »Thanks for the detailed report and video example @Akgurd. We've sent everything over to our Dev and QA teams for investigation.
Couldn't do this on Thursday when it was posted so that the fix could of made it into today's patch eh?
'Chaos5 -
MLRPZ✭✭✭✭✭So It need players loosing their time so you aknowledge this ?
Great job @Akgurd tho and thanks.
PLS fix ASAPAD // Marc the Epic Goat // Templar // AR50
EP // The Goatfather // Templar // AR44
AD // Unforgoatable // Sorc // AR33
EP // You Goat Rekt // NB // AR28
EP // Bill Goats // Swarden // AR28
AD // Goat Ya // NB // AR24
AD // Unforgoatten // StamDK // AR 21
DC // Egoatcentric // Stamsorc // AR16
and many unused PVE chars
REMOVE FACTION LOCKAoE RatsRIP Zerg SquadRIP Banana Squad IncNot your typical goat1 -
booksmcread✭✭✭✭ZOS_JessicaFolsom wrote: »Thanks for the detailed report and video example @Akgurd. We've sent everything over to our Dev and QA teams for investigation.
Couldn't do this on Thursday when it was posted so that the fix could of made it into today's patch eh?
They have no idea what they're doing.1 -
Akgurd✭✭✭ZOS_JessicaFolsom wrote: »Thanks for the detailed report and video example @Akgurd. We've sent everything over to our Dev and QA teams for investigation.
Thanks for responding!
At least it's a step forward!
Aknight1 -
Bfish22090✭✭✭✭✭now it makes sense as to getting bombard spammed in a negate is a death sentence for me0
-
Mulcibur✭✭✭@ZOS_JessicaFolsom Probably happening with rapids too. We've seen some issues with that but have not tested as yet.0 -
ZOS_JessicaFolsomCommunity Manager@ZOS_JessicaFolsom Probably happening with rapids too. We've seen some issues with that but have not tested as yet.
Okay, thank you. We'll have the team look at Rapid Maneuver for this same call-out.2 -
Zheg✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭
Or any word on the people that move faster than a sprinting orc with rapids on? Or will I get banned for talking about that because ZOS doesn't want to? -_-4 -
holosoul✭✭✭✭ZOS_JessicaFolsom wrote: »@ZOS_JessicaFolsom Probably happening with rapids too. We've seen some issues with that but have not tested as yet.
Okay, thank you. We'll have the team look at Rapid Maneuver for this same call-out.
Charging maneuver in particular is completely broken and more than half the time (even solo, with 0 buffs or even food) it will not apply to yourself. This is particularly problematic for magicka characters that can only cast it exactly once. I've had it fail upwards of three times in a row, the "Charging maneuver" 5 second buff will stay applied but rapids will expire after 1 or 0 seconds for no reason whatsoever.
Edit: To clarify, this problem does not exist with either the unmorphed version or retreating.Edited by holosoul on June 21, 2016 9:22PM0
