This game will eventually die, so here's what you should do next time.

UltimaJoe777

Justice31st wrote: »

UltimaJoe777 wrote: »

Justice31st wrote: »

UltimaJoe777 wrote: »

Justice31st wrote: »

UltimaJoe777 wrote: »

Justice31st wrote: »

UltimaJoe777 wrote: »

Justice31st wrote: »

UltimaJoe777 wrote: »

Volkodav wrote: »

Justice31st wrote: »

UltimaJoe777 wrote: »

Justice31st wrote: »

kevlarto_ESO wrote: »

bareheiny wrote: »

Every game will eventually "die".

So why not focus on the one we have and advocate for change...rather than talk about the next version, which could be years away if ever.

Hell, DCUO has been dying for the last five years or so...

Pretty much this^^^, wow will die, eso will die, eq will die, enjoy while you can games as we know it will die at some point.. and part 2's never seem to work very well.

It has been almost 12 years and WOW is still not dead yet. Unfortunately, the life of ESO will not even last half of that. Zenimax should of taken some notes from its predecessors.

Wouldn't be so sure of that yet. Zenimax is constantly turning heads with every DLC, thus extending its playability.

The day zero bugs/exploits says other wise.

This isnt true.Its just your opinion.I and tons of other players,obviously,find ESO to be quite playable.

Some of the issues are annoying and exploiters of some outrageous acts should indeed be penalized for doing so but whuddyagunnado... I don't like them but they aren't gamebreaking like Skyrim's bugs were.

That is the problem. You are comparing a single player game to an MMO (Massively Multiplayer Online game)

No I'm not. I'm comparing the bugs from one game to the bugs from another in quantity and quality. Has nothing to do with the games themselves.

Seriously though Skyrim was totally unplayable and I am hoping the remake is not a repeat of that hot mess...

Skyrim was so buggy because single players games do not receive weekly updates ( due to no monthly fee or subscription services) which allows game developers to be financially supported to keep a staff of game developers to patch their game/ make it less buggy from weekly maintanence. MMO's do so. This is an MMO, so comparing a patched single player game to an MMO is like comparing apples to oranges.

Actually it is possible to update single player games via DLC and patches. Perhaps not back then but now it is. At least with that said the remake will have a chance to be playable now if it comes out the same as before.

Yes, I know single player games get patched, however the frequency is not high like MMO's. So comparing an single players buggs to an MMO where consumers pay a montly fee or store item purchases that support an development team thats very job is too make a game more stable is not right.

Well I could easily compare the bugs and exploits in this game to many others I've played both single and multi player but they were never gamebreakers like Skyrim's. Skyrim is literally the only game I found unplayable, regardless of it being single or multi player. It basically builds a tolerance to piddly bugs and exploits like ESO has.

Why are you still using a single player game as an excuse for Zenimax's lack of game fixes for the past 2+ years in their MMO. This is pointless to debate. Good day lol.

Because as I already said the bugs in ESO are piddly in comparison to the ones Skyrim suffered from. Doesn't matter what kind of games they are ESO is not unplayable. If it was it really would be dieing.

What are you talking about. You are the one who first mentioned ESO's playability. I posted about the bugs/exploits that are still in the game after 2+year that haven't been patched. And also disputed you about you believing ESO will last as long as World of Warcraft which is ludicrous. WOW has been out since 2004 and still has more subscribers than ESO. And Skyrim was playable. Many people have finished the games story line.

Actually I wasn't. Someone else brought up its playability in response to you posting about the bugs. Also I never said ESO would last any given period of time. I simply stated it isn't dieing and that it could very well go for that long for all we know. Honestly what's ludicrous is how WoW managed to survive as long as it has. It's obvious that their little tourneys are the cause. And then there's Skyrim's playability, yes it is opinionated but it also depends on what you did with it. Hearthfire was the worst thing about it, bugs all over. The rest depended on what you did, or how much you did. Do too much and it freezes every 5 seconds. Skyrim was a completionist's nightmare! It's only ok on PC because of player-made patches but I played it on PS3.

attackjet

Not once have I said this game is dying guys, it is eventually going to die and those were just some things I would like to see in the next elder scrolls mmo if they make one again

ArchMikem

Duiwel wrote: »

ArchMikem wrote: »

Its a fun and good game NOW. From what i saw back then ESO looked pretty crap, and they wanted a subscription? Joe was right in his review. Im positive his tone would be different now if he did the review again.

By the sound of it you weren't here or played it so remind me again how you can give an opinion mate?

You didn't ask for an Educated Opinion. Then again you didn't ask for an Opinion, however everyone is entitled to share their own, regardless if you choose to listen or not.

I like how you take everything someone else says as law and written in stone though, way to have an opinion for youself! - claps

Putting words in my mouth and then mocking me for them. I never believe someone's opinion as holy scripture. However Joe never gives his reviews through just word alone, his format includes several recorded examples of his own personal experiences, thus, giving weight to his own arguments instead of just relying on stupid people believing what comes out of his mouth.

Also, when you write out an action in text, you're supposed to put it in bold.

Sausage

Play Conan Exiles!