It's a pretty big deal, and was pretty damned childish on ZOS's part the way they did it.
demonaffinity wrote: »I think its hilarious. They remove something that we so desperately need on ESO, and for what reason? Their logic amuses me sometimes. But hey, it's their business. They are the ones pissing off costumers
well maybe they are planning to add DPS test training dummies in the next patch?
. They just don't want people to easily be able to test their abilities and rotations because doing so would allow players to more easily figure out how bugged some abilities are.
joshisanonymous wrote: »Perhaps they *fixed it* (obviously this wasn't an intended use) because they don't actually want players to be able to easily run tests? Their design philosophy has always seemed to be against the sort of thing that turns MMOs into graphical statistics simulations, complete with elitism against anyone who isn't up to date on the latest player testing that shows the X + Y while wearing Z is clearly the optimal rotation.
cwstonoffb14a_ESO wrote: »joshisanonymous wrote: »Perhaps they *fixed it* (obviously this wasn't an intended use) because they don't actually want players to be able to easily run tests? Their design philosophy has always seemed to be against the sort of thing that turns MMOs into graphical statistics simulations, complete with elitism against anyone who isn't up to date on the latest player testing that shows the X + Y while wearing Z is clearly the optimal rotation.
IF this were the case, why introduce content (Veteran Maw of Lorkhaj) which literally requires you to be pulling X DPS in Y Time, all while only having a few gear combinations in game that achieve said result. IF they didn't want this game to be what you describe, then why require players to be pulling 30k+ DPS sustained on 6-7 minute encounters? It seems to me that they do want a place for elitists, and then they removed the ONE tool that would allow players to test long term and find setups that compete competitively. Unless I'm missing something?
dimensional wrote: »
dimensional wrote: »