Dread_Knight_N7 wrote: »I'm honestly surprised. I thought the no CP campaign would at least be an interesting twist to the current meta of the game. I'm probably going to slot it as my guest campaign when it comes out for consoles anyways
Monk_Slayer wrote: »I wouldn't go so far as to say Azuras is an AD buff server, even if that still existed, and that I am mainly AD. I'd say it's nearly equal on all sides in terms of population, or used to be.
its an AD buff server. I dealt with it in hopesfire and haderus, i will not put up with it a 3rd time. I will stay in BwB and pop into Azuras from time to time, as I refuse to play in PvP campaigns with CP enabled.
Actually I got this one wrong, there were people playing it last night, and fighting on multiple fronts.
It was sort of fun playing in a campaign where my V1-V3 toons were competitive and not just Zerg fodder. There was zero lag. Most of the other players were lower level alliance-war, so everyone wasn't just running around mob-spamming AOE abilities. There was absolutely none of the usual one-shot death *** like the regular campaigns that you usually get with less than 50 CP.
I'll try the sewers next, but as someone already pointed out, you need to bring one friend and you'll be fine.
It was fun, try it if you don't mind a change of pace. Bring an alt that isn't maxed out on CP or roll a new one, you might enjoy it.
bowmanz607 wrote: »its an AD buff server. I dealt with it in hopesfire and haderus, i will not put up with it a 3rd time. I will stay in BwB and pop into Azuras from time to time, as I refuse to play in PvP campaigns with CP enabled.
I still don't get why people refer to these type of servers as buff servers. This was true back in the day when bonuses carried over to pvp. Today, there are no buff servers. Never got this statememt. It's not like the alliance is like hey let's kill everything so we can maintain these buffs on an empty server we won't fight on anyway.
I digress.