I have a feeling that part of the problem is that they don't actually play their own damned game. That would explain the *** poor QA we see on a daily basis. Well that, and maybe we should start a Go Fund Me to help send their coders to some remedial math classes...
UltimaJoe777 wrote: »I have a feeling that part of the problem is that they don't actually play their own damned game. That would explain the *** poor QA we see on a daily basis. Well that, and maybe we should start a Go Fund Me to help send their coders to some remedial math classes...
Unfortunately your "feeling" would be quite off the mark. They do test this stuff but unexpected bugs can still occur. That of course is why they appreciate these kinds of reports and feedback. It's a huge game and they cannot keep tabs on every single digit of coding at all times... Every coder overlooks one thing or another at times, this I can personally vouch for.
UltimaJoe777 wrote: »I have a feeling that part of the problem is that they don't actually play their own damned game. That would explain the *** poor QA we see on a daily basis. Well that, and maybe we should start a Go Fund Me to help send their coders to some remedial math classes...
Unfortunately your "feeling" would be quite off the mark. They do test this stuff but unexpected bugs can still occur. That of course is why they appreciate these kinds of reports and feedback. It's a huge game and they cannot keep tabs on every single digit of coding at all times... Every coder overlooks one thing or another at times, this I can personally vouch for.
Unfortunately your feeling of high esteem for Z. is quite off the mark. A week for fixing 1 game breaking bug just to introduce at least 1 more is the incompetence of magnitude that i have seen just in niche or indie products, not in multi million AAA game.
UltimaJoe777 wrote: »UltimaJoe777 wrote: »I have a feeling that part of the problem is that they don't actually play their own damned game. That would explain the *** poor QA we see on a daily basis. Well that, and maybe we should start a Go Fund Me to help send their coders to some remedial math classes...
Unfortunately your "feeling" would be quite off the mark. They do test this stuff but unexpected bugs can still occur. That of course is why they appreciate these kinds of reports and feedback. It's a huge game and they cannot keep tabs on every single digit of coding at all times... Every coder overlooks one thing or another at times, this I can personally vouch for.
Unfortunately your feeling of high esteem for Z. is quite off the mark. A week for fixing 1 game breaking bug just to introduce at least 1 more is the incompetence of magnitude that i have seen just in niche or indie products, not in multi million AAA game.
You misunderstand. Zenimax is not perfect, nor is anyone else. Mistakes are always made and mistakes are not necessarily intentional, yet people criticize them first chance they get anyway. So I hold Zenimax in high esteem because I don't bash them the moment something goes wrong because I believe they are supposed to be perfect and never get anything wrong? Tell ya what, palsy: You go make and operate such a huge game, never make a single mistake, and then we'll talk ok? I don't criticize Zenimax because I know they didn't do this stuff on purpose and will fix it when they know about it and can, but unfortunately there are many who are quick to judge without even considering their position...
UltimaJoe777 wrote: »I have a feeling that part of the problem is that they don't actually play their own damned game. That would explain the *** poor QA we see on a daily basis. Well that, and maybe we should start a Go Fund Me to help send their coders to some remedial math classes...
Unfortunately your "feeling" would be quite off the mark. They do test this stuff but unexpected bugs can still occur. That of course is why they appreciate these kinds of reports and feedback. It's a huge game and they cannot keep tabs on every single digit of coding at all times... Every coder overlooks one thing or another at times, this I can personally vouch for.
UltimaJoe777 wrote: »UltimaJoe777 wrote: »I have a feeling that part of the problem is that they don't actually play their own damned game. That would explain the *** poor QA we see on a daily basis. Well that, and maybe we should start a Go Fund Me to help send their coders to some remedial math classes...
Unfortunately your "feeling" would be quite off the mark. They do test this stuff but unexpected bugs can still occur. That of course is why they appreciate these kinds of reports and feedback. It's a huge game and they cannot keep tabs on every single digit of coding at all times... Every coder overlooks one thing or another at times, this I can personally vouch for.
Unfortunately your feeling of high esteem for Z. is quite off the mark. A week for fixing 1 game breaking bug just to introduce at least 1 more is the incompetence of magnitude that i have seen just in niche or indie products, not in multi million AAA game.
You misunderstand. Zenimax is not perfect, nor is anyone else. Mistakes are always made and mistakes are not necessarily intentional, yet people criticize them first chance they get anyway. So I hold Zenimax in high esteem because I don't bash them the moment something goes wrong because I believe they are supposed to be perfect and never get anything wrong? Tell ya what, palsy: You go make and operate such a huge game, never make a single mistake, and then we'll talk ok? I don't criticize Zenimax because I know they didn't do this stuff on purpose and will fix it when they know about it and can, but unfortunately there are many who are quick to judge without even considering their position...
None of that made any sense.
UltimaJoe777 wrote: »I have a feeling that part of the problem is that they don't actually play their own damned game. That would explain the *** poor QA we see on a daily basis. Well that, and maybe we should start a Go Fund Me to help send their coders to some remedial math classes...
Unfortunately your "feeling" would be quite off the mark. They do test this stuff but unexpected bugs can still occur. That of course is why they appreciate these kinds of reports and feedback. It's a huge game and they cannot keep tabs on every single digit of coding at all times... Every coder overlooks one thing or another at times, this I can personally vouch for.
NO you can personally vouch that YOU overlook one thing or another at times.
Please stop defending this stuff. It's starting to look like you're being paid to do it.
UltimaJoe777 wrote: »UltimaJoe777 wrote: »I have a feeling that part of the problem is that they don't actually play their own damned game. That would explain the *** poor QA we see on a daily basis. Well that, and maybe we should start a Go Fund Me to help send their coders to some remedial math classes...
Unfortunately your "feeling" would be quite off the mark. They do test this stuff but unexpected bugs can still occur. That of course is why they appreciate these kinds of reports and feedback. It's a huge game and they cannot keep tabs on every single digit of coding at all times... Every coder overlooks one thing or another at times, this I can personally vouch for.
Unfortunately your feeling of high esteem for Z. is quite off the mark. A week for fixing 1 game breaking bug just to introduce at least 1 more is the incompetence of magnitude that i have seen just in niche or indie products, not in multi million AAA game.
You misunderstand. Zenimax is not perfect, nor is anyone else. Mistakes are always made and mistakes are not necessarily intentional, yet people criticize them first chance they get anyway. So I hold Zenimax in high esteem because I don't bash them the moment something goes wrong because I believe they are supposed to be perfect and never get anything wrong? Tell ya what, palsy: You go make and operate such a huge game, never make a single mistake, and then we'll talk ok? I don't criticize Zenimax because I know they didn't do this stuff on purpose and will fix it when they know about it and can, but unfortunately there are many who are quick to judge without even considering their position...
UltimaJoe777 wrote: »UltimaJoe777 wrote: »I have a feeling that part of the problem is that they don't actually play their own damned game. That would explain the *** poor QA we see on a daily basis. Well that, and maybe we should start a Go Fund Me to help send their coders to some remedial math classes...
Unfortunately your "feeling" would be quite off the mark. They do test this stuff but unexpected bugs can still occur. That of course is why they appreciate these kinds of reports and feedback. It's a huge game and they cannot keep tabs on every single digit of coding at all times... Every coder overlooks one thing or another at times, this I can personally vouch for.
Unfortunately your feeling of high esteem for Z. is quite off the mark. A week for fixing 1 game breaking bug just to introduce at least 1 more is the incompetence of magnitude that i have seen just in niche or indie products, not in multi million AAA game.
You misunderstand. Zenimax is not perfect, nor is anyone else. Mistakes are always made and mistakes are not necessarily intentional, yet people criticize them first chance they get anyway. So I hold Zenimax in high esteem because I don't bash them the moment something goes wrong because I believe they are supposed to be perfect and never get anything wrong? Tell ya what, palsy: You go make and operate such a huge game, never make a single mistake, and then we'll talk ok? I don't criticize Zenimax because I know they didn't do this stuff on purpose and will fix it when they know about it and can, but unfortunately there are many who are quick to judge without even considering their position...
Unjustly? How does basic crap like this pass QA testing? Why do players find this stuff out almost immediately, but the game developers let it slide?UltimaJoe777 wrote: »
You don't need to be paid to do what is right. Zenimax is constantly unjustly bashed for completely normal issues that come up during a patch or update when in hindsight it is honestly insignificant to the work they perform.