RizaHawkeye wrote: »PreciousFaith wrote: »https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZeniMax_Online_Studios
If you go and read about zenimax this is the 1st game they have ever had... yes its a sub branch but it is a stand alone company as well..
Think of it this way.. dad gave baby his treasured posession and baby is doing his/her best, but not being educated enough doesnt mean we need to scream and shout.
Are you serious? I didn't pay for daddy's baby. I paid for a game. A GAME.
Are you seriously arguing that, because this is their first game, Zenimax is entitle to sell something to consumers that doesn't work as promised on the game webpage? A game that has bugs that need to be fixed. A game that could be better? That we should look at the product that we paid for and just sigh and say, "Well, it's not perfect but I'll give them E for effort."
I have a huge problem with this attitude. The sustained employment of this attitude encourages video game companies to continue to release buggy garbage. "We don't have to get it right," they say, even as they put a $50, $60 or $80 price tag on a game, "because people will buy the game even if it's broken."
This argument of "Oh, they did their best" fits right up with "All games are buggy so this one can be buggy, too."
I think Zenimax made a game that has a lot of good elements. It also has a number of lot of bugs and problems. These need to be fixed, because we PAID for the game. And some of us are subbed so we're still paying for the game.
Not being educated enough? If they didn't know what they were doing, then why did they charge us for it. Eggghhh!!!!
Funkopotamus wrote: »BlueGreenMikey wrote: »PreciousFaith wrote: »Think of it this way.. dad gave baby his treasured posession and baby is doing his/her best, but not being educated enough doesnt mean we need to scream and shout.
I love that you are defending a company that you are comparing to a baby.
Also, this analogy doesn't quite work, because the baby isn't trying to sell us anything.
So that baby is only holding $4300.00! Anyone else count that up?
firstdecan wrote: »I thought ZoS had removed all the bugs, at least from Cyrodiil. I'll give them credit for that.
Funkopotamus wrote: »1] Not adding Text Chat as it would help players communicate for trading/Grouping and even role playing.
Funkopotamus wrote: »2] The CP system is a system that will discourage any "new sales" of the game as no sane person will want to buy/join a MMO that they will never be able to play on a competitive level with the majority of the player base. The system will only continue to increase a gap between any new player that wants to join and the rest of the player base. MMO's survive only if the number of "New Players" is equal to or greater than the players that leave. This CP system willcinsure that not to many "New Players" are going to be joining the community!
Funkopotamus wrote: »4] We were told the Vet Ranks are going to be removed and yet we are getting an increase to VR16 with very little information as to exactly "WHY" and also there is no new information as to when the VR system is to be removed. I mean what is the deal? Does anyone know what is going on?
Funkopotamus wrote: »5] Lack of communication from the DEVS directly to the players. Players should not have to /search for information regarding the future of the game! Players are left to hunt down tid bits of information on obscure websites and reddit post or some random live stream. When this information should be openly talked about and voiced to the players on the OFFICAL game forums/website.