Update 44 is now available for testing on the PTS! You can read the latest patch notes here: https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/categories/pts
Maintenance for the week of September 30:
• PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – September 30, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 8:00AM EDT (12:00 UTC)
• Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – October 2, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
• PlayStation®: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – October 2, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)

"Pact Advocate" quest. Really? (Spoilers)

XarxesTheScribe
Had to go back to Grahtwood for a missing mission, and this was it. I enclosed the rest within the "spoiler" brackets.
You have to accuse one of the three, even though none are truly guilty? She ordered a flower already cut. She didn't commit the act, so she didn't break the Green Pact. Her husband found the flower, after it had already been cut, so he didn't do anything wrong. The Khajiit cut the flower, but he isn't bound by the Green Pact, so it isn't just for him to be involved in any of this. How are you supposed to subject any of these individuals to the "justice" chamber? Who did you accuse?
  • Enodoc
    Enodoc
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    It's a great quest for moral dilemmas, and you are correct that none of them are directly guilty. But also, none of them are completely innocent.
    I accused the wife, as it was her, indirectly, who ordered the plant to be cut and orchestrated the whole thing. The lines in her journal "The Green Pact can't be a suicide pact, can it?" and "I am too weak to harvest Sanguine Alendil myself, but I will find a way." were what cemented it for me.
    UESP: The Unofficial Elder Scrolls Pages - A collaborative source for all knowledge on the Elder Scrolls series since 1995
    Join us on Discord - discord.gg/uesp
Sign In or Register to comment.