Jennifur_Vultee wrote: »Yay I picked a random yes or no to a vague poll! What do I win?
Jennifur_Vultee wrote: »Yay I picked a random yes or no to a vague poll! What do I win?
Well, a lot of folks are yammering for a return of the "disagree" button, which would require no further input.
... so I'll offer none here either.
Spectral_Lord wrote: »More Cadwell. It needs more Cadwell.Elijah_Crow wrote: »Need more cowbell. Um, more content. But it's coming!
Spectral_Lord wrote: »More Cadwell. It needs more Cadwell.Elijah_Crow wrote: »Need more cowbell. Um, more content. But it's coming!
This isn't a very good poll. An online game can never be "fine as is". Grow or die. Right now ESO is a truly decent game, no better. To be sustainable I feel it needs:
-IC and the other previously shown content
- additional Tamrielic zones opened up
- More pvp content/options
- More (and more difficult) vet dungeons
- More (and more difficult) trials
- Known bugs and exploitable conditions MUST be fixed, truly fixed
- CP system refinement or overhaul
Those are just the things off the top of my head, and that's just if we accept that cadwells silver and gold, and that class and race balancing, are all good enough as is (which are all a matter of debate).
This isn't a very good poll. An online game can never be "fine as is". Grow or die. Right now ESO is a truly decent game, no better. To be sustainable I feel it needs:
-IC and the other previously shown content
- additional Tamrielic zones opened up
- More pvp content/options
- More (and more difficult) vet dungeons
- More (and more difficult) trials
- Known bugs and exploitable conditions MUST be fixed, truly fixed
- CP system refinement or overhaul
Those are just the things off the top of my head, and that's just if we accept that cadwells silver and gold, and that class and race balancing, are all good enough as is (which are all a matter of debate).
You're overthinking the poll. It really intended nothing other than demonstrate how ignorant it is to disagree with a statement without explaining why.
timborggrenlarsenb16_ESO wrote: »ESO is just another follow that ass, and step in more and more *** on the way - game!
This isn't a very good poll. An online game can never be "fine as is". Grow or die. Right now ESO is a truly decent game, no better. To be sustainable I feel it needs:
-IC and the other previously shown content
- additional Tamrielic zones opened up
- More pvp content/options
- More (and more difficult) vet dungeons
- More (and more difficult) trials
- Known bugs and exploitable conditions MUST be fixed, truly fixed
- CP system refinement or overhaul
Those are just the things off the top of my head, and that's just if we accept that cadwells silver and gold, and that class and race balancing, are all good enough as is (which are all a matter of debate).
You're overthinking the poll. It really intended nothing other than demonstrate how ignorant it is to disagree with a statement without explaining why.
You know... You're a very spiteful person who really hates to lose if this is true.
If you seriously made this to try and prove a point, you are a very petty person. Much like I stated in the other thread, I didn't vote either because neither option truly works in this situation for me.
The game is both fine as it is, yet it's not fine as it is. Some things need to change, while others are fine as they are.
"Fine as is" is very subjective.