just wondering as i am hearing it alot on here and am curios can anyone help me out?
filmoretub17_ESO wrote: »AD and DC are masters of this just observe.
To be fair "Zerg" is overused in eso, a lot of people call a 24 man group a Zerg due to the fact that 24 man groups tend to bring about lag. But IMO a Zerg is like 28+ . Group sizes are 24 for a reason, anything more should be construed as a Zerg. Due to whatever is causing lag (bad coding or particles, servers, whatever it is) people generalize anything over about 18 as a Zerg
To be fair "Zerg" is overused in eso, a lot of people call a 24 man group a Zerg due to the fact that 24 man groups tend to bring about lag. But IMO a Zerg is like 28+ . Group sizes are 24 for a reason, anything more should be construed as a Zerg. Due to whatever is causing lag (bad coding or particles, servers, whatever it is) people generalize anything over about 18 as a Zerg
To be fair "Zerg" is overused in eso, a lot of people call a 24 man group a Zerg due to the fact that 24 man groups tend to bring about lag. But IMO a Zerg is like 28+ . Group sizes are 24 for a reason, anything more should be construed as a Zerg. Due to whatever is causing lag (bad coding or particles, servers, whatever it is) people generalize anything over about 18 as a Zerg
To be fair "Zerg" is overused in eso, a lot of people call a 24 man group a Zerg due to the fact that 24 man groups tend to bring about lag. But IMO a Zerg is like 28+ . Group sizes are 24 for a reason, anything more should be construed as a Zerg. Due to whatever is causing lag (bad coding or particles, servers, whatever it is) people generalize anything over about 18 as a Zerg
Zerg is overused and missused on eso and on these forums. A 24 man group of people can be a zerg if they run spread out without coordination. A 24 man group that is stacked up is more of a train (lagtrain usually) but they don't just rely on numbers, they rely on coordination. Since most of the time, these 24 man trains run into smaller groups, it seems as if they are only gaining advantage through numbers, when they actually strive to deal with even bigger forces.
You don't need 28 people running together for it to be a zerg... 15-20 unorganized players running all over the place without a clue or just mindlessly following whoever is in front of them constitue a ZERG.
The origin from Starcraft was that you would keep flooding your opponent with a massive number of units, without trying to micro them and without making the most use out of every unit, just piling them upon your opponent's defenses until they gave in.
And that's what it is in Eso, when you send a zerg towards enemy lines, the zerg is gonna loose many people, but who cares? there's always gonna be another little zergling after the next
filmoretub17_ESO wrote: »AD and DC are masters of this just observe.
To be fair "Zerg" is overused in eso, a lot of people call a 24 man group a Zerg due to the fact that 24 man groups tend to bring about lag. But IMO a Zerg is like 28+ . Group sizes are 24 for a reason, anything more should be construed as a Zerg. Due to whatever is causing lag (bad coding or particles, servers, whatever it is) people generalize anything over about 18 as a Zerg