If you have a subscription
Aett_Thorn wrote: »Not truly known yet. If you are a subscriber, they should be. But we don't know yet about others.
In all honesty, I feel like they should give us a few updates for free since we haven't gotten one in a long time, but this is really the only way they have of making money, so I doubt that they will be.
Deja vu? Didnt we have the exact same thread Yday??
ZOS_JessicaFolsom wrote: »We talked about this a bit in last Friday's ESO Live, during our Ask Us Anything segment (around the 45:45 mark.) We are planning some small tweaks to racial passives in our next major update (with Imperial City.) After that, we'll reevaluate. Long-term we may consider putting race changes in the Crown Store.
Aett_Thorn wrote: »Not truly known yet. If you are a subscriber, they should be. But we don't know yet about others.
In all honesty, I feel like they should give us a few updates for free since we haven't gotten one in a long time, but this is really the only way they have of making money, so I doubt that they will be.
It is a new area, sort ot. You get inside through the sewere, so it's easy to lock off.Well, IC is technically a part of Cyrodiil, so that means they would just unlock the entire Cyrodiil, it's not like a brand new area in tamriel like Craglorn used to be, nor as big or expansive.
So yeah it should be free. They are just making the PvP zone into the thing they advertised us so much. Instead of a half-arsed horse simulator with no real purpose.

This^^^I loooove the smell of schadenfreude in the morning.
So, the same community who allegedly "begged" ZOS to make the game F2P (or B2P, if you care about the distinction) is now begging for free content. Priceless.
P.S. If it were up to me, the game would still be subscription only and all content would be free.
We didn't beg for F2P, on the contrary, most of us here on the forum was opposed to this idea.I loooove the smell of schadenfreude in the morning.
So, the same community who allegedly "begged" ZOS to make the game F2P (or B2P, if you care about the distinction) is now begging for free content. Priceless.
P.S. If it were up to me, the game would still be subscription only and all content would be free.
MornaBaine wrote: »While I expect Imperial City and Orsinium/Wrothgar to be DLC for which they expect payment, if that is indeed going to be the case it leaves a pretty bad taste in my mouth since these were promised additions LONG before the game went B2P. They should be free updates based on that alone. Otherwise, my suspicion is going to be that ZoS deliberately held them back as long as they did just so they could make us pay extra for them. And that stinks. I'd LIKE to think the company is better than that.
When Firor compares what Elder Scrolls will offer its premium players to free offerings, he brings up issues that F2P titles once had in abundance, yet are not as prevelant now. "Elder Scrolls is about being in a giant world, where you’re exploring, and you go to a dungeon, and you don’t get a paygate in front of you saying you don’t have this dungeon," Firor says. "Which means, to us, you need to monetise it outside of the game." While paygates are increasingly less common, some barriers still persist. Certainly, the penny-pinching tactics found in The Old Republic are not desirable.
And there's something to be said about not being confronted with extra costs while in the game itself. "You go outside the game, you pay your month, you go in the game, and when you’re in the game, you’re in the game," Firor clarifies. "There’s no real world stuff reaching in to grab you." Few things break immersion quicker than a game telling you that you can spend cash to unlock chests or get special gear.
MornaBaine wrote: »While I expect Imperial City and Orsinium/Wrothgar to be DLC for which they expect payment, if that is indeed going to be the case it leaves a pretty bad taste in my mouth since these were promised additions LONG before the game went B2P.