Because of the block cost calculation is always doubtful to me.
And according to the post (
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/158960/tanking-with-the-lt-champion-points-and-block-cost-reduction-for-tanking) the calculation of block consumption based on it has relatively high error with the actual test value I got.
After my constant experiments, finally find the accurate formula of the block cost calculation.
It is well known that there are only 5 known methods to reduce the block cost in the game:
1, cp point: Block Expertise
2, 5 heavy passive Bracing (20%)
3, sword & shield passive Fortress (30%)
4, jewelry enchant block wasting (v14 gold 200 each)
5, sword and shield skill defensive (8%)
Means to reduce cost of block which are described specifically are list above.
So with 6% reduce block cost I invest in champion system, I get the data of following table:
Data in the table is from test with little blue bee outside reaper's march, and it record the cost of block as well as reduction percentage of the certain type of attack that cost the least stamina.
We can esaily learn from the data and find a law that is:
No matter how mcuh percentage reduction involved (the 2 or 3 or 5), the final cost is different from number of heavy armor equiped.
and it is exact 48 for every piece of heavy armor.
(where number change from 4 to 5 doesn't count, Bracing concerned)
Although there is lack of data of influence of numbers of light or medium armor, I can assure you it's irrelevant.
Therefore, I found a very accurate block cost calculation formula with reference of the discuss post above:
Block cost
= [2160 (without reduction) - number of enchant * enchant value (200 for legendary quality)]
* [1 - Block Expertise in CP(6% for me) ]
* [1 - Bracing 20% (if any) - Fortress 30% (if any) - Abosrb Magic 8% (if any) ]
- number of equiped heavy armor * 48
Btw, the enchantment value is questionable since the 4.27 maintainance, it's found sometime the actual value of epic enchantment has no difference with legendary one.
And I'm happily welcome everyone test this formula and discuss.
Thx.
Thx for the info from some warm-hearted guys,
I made a terrible mistake about this result
I took the second passive of heavy armor into acount !
thats how I get 48 for each piece of armor, I'm so sry for the inconvenience brought to you guys