Can we have a new Wrothgar / Orsinium teaser?

Faulgor

During yesterday's ESO live, Zeb Cook said their current version of Orsinium looks much better than what we saw at QuakeCon. Gina agreed.
With no new content for several more months, can we at least get a peek? We've been looking at the same footage since October, and it would be nice to see how the development team's work has progressed since then.

Come on, throw us a bone!

stefan.gustavsonb16_ESO

Another teaser at this point would only make me even more frustrated. I am starved for content and need more than a bone.

Valymer

I'm at the point of stopping playing until they release something new. Logging in to do writs/research/horse-feeding but I've unsubbed and will be playing other games until either Cyrodiil is fixed to my satisfaction or some new content is released.

A teaser wouldn't change my stance on that.

daswahnsinn

I have unsubbed and have stopped playing. I tried making another character but the vr grinding is worse then the first time. I would love some new content and less lag in pvp/pve. I'll be looking at something else to play or I might get back into Android development.

bloodenragedb14_ESO

better yet, release it sooner, force console players to pay for it at launch, make them angry with that so i can sit back, eat popcorn, and laugh and mock their utter misery in the coming days of frustration.

lets not forget ZOS, you need to throw pc players a bone to abate their already impressive rage for being ignored.

Darkonflare15

bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »

better yet, release it sooner, force console players to pay for it at launch, make them angry with that so i can sit back, eat popcorn, and laugh and mock their utter misery in the coming days of frustration.

lets not forget ZOS, you need to throw pc players a bone to abate their already impressive rage for being ignored.

Wow so you want console players to be mad about day one dlc because PC players are mad about not having content but console players had to wait a year and two months and are already mad about the delay. I do not think PC players have been ignored as long as console players.

Lets not be negative. Once the consoles are out pc players and console players can both get new content and both do not have to worry about being ignore.

Teiji

No new content shall nor should be released until console settles down.

TESO: TU is product which is sold in order to acquire monetary gain.

Releasing additional content when the game hasn't even been released on all platforms yet is nonsense.

We shouldn't get any teasers, any information or anything at all until console settles down, unless it's an event where this is the necessary such as Quakecon.

DLC should best be used to maximise it's potential whilst simultaneously acting as an indirect marketing tool, anyone who says otherwise is just spurring controversy for the sake of it and isn't interested in longevity of the game.

This is not my personal opinion either, this is factual information based on marketing trends, consumer habits and general for-profit organisation requirements. Not forgetting TESO: TU will not be officially released until it is available on all announced playable platforms.

TESO:TU is a game which is playable on PC, Xbox One and Playstation 4 platforms; until it is available as advertised like this, the product TESO:TU will not be released.

This is not ignoring the fact that TESO:TU is currently already available on PC - but the product itself is not fully released - why would DLC be available before TESO:TU is completely out available to all potential consumers?

NadiusMaximus

Teiji wrote: »

No new content shall nor should be released until console settles down.

TESO: TU is product which is sold in order to acquire monetary gain.

Releasing additional content when the game hasn't even been released on all platforms yet is nonsense.

We shouldn't get any teasers, any information or anything at all until console settles down, unless it's an event where this is the necessary such as Quakecon.

DLC should best be used to maximise it's potential whilst simultaneously acting as an indirect marketing tool, anyone who says otherwise is just spurring controversy for the sake of it and isn't interested in longevity of the game.

This is not my personal opinion either, this is factual information based on marketing trends, consumer habits and general for-profit organisation requirements. Not forgetting TESO: TU will not be officially released until it is available on all announced playable platforms.

TESO:TU is a game which is playable on PC, Xbox One and Playstation 4 platforms; until it is available as advertised like this, the product TESO:TU will not be released.

This is not ignoring the fact that TESO:TU is currently already available on PC - but the product itself is not fully released - why would DLC be available before TESO:TU is completely out available to all potential consumers?

Then why have we been playing this game for a year already?
It should have been pushed back so it could launch on all three at once, right?
We have been here almost a year, and paying a subscription for the upcoming content that we were told would be released last September, then pushed back again till latter this year. All under the guise of waiting for consoles.
Consoles are just an excuse for them not hitting deadlines.
Watch, non of this stuff will be released untill next year.

PC since day one = $250.00 invested into game so far
Console = $60.00

Both will have to buy dlc even though it was said to be almost finished last year, but being held for consoles release. Wtf? Plus even though we have paid for the games development over the last year, we won't actually own the dlc unless we buy it out right.
If you have a sub and get it, if you drop your sub, you loose the content gained untill you buy it again? Wtf?

Valymer

Teiji wrote: »

No new content shall nor should be released until console settles down.

TESO: TU is product which is sold in order to acquire monetary gain.

Releasing additional content when the game hasn't even been released on all platforms yet is nonsense.

We shouldn't get any teasers, any information or anything at all until console settles down, unless it's an event where this is the necessary such as Quakecon.

DLC should best be used to maximise it's potential whilst simultaneously acting as an indirect marketing tool, anyone who says otherwise is just spurring controversy for the sake of it and isn't interested in longevity of the game.

This is not my personal opinion either, this is factual information based on marketing trends, consumer habits and general for-profit organisation requirements. Not forgetting TESO: TU will not be officially released until it is available on all announced playable platforms.

TESO:TU is a game which is playable on PC, Xbox One and Playstation 4 platforms; until it is available as advertised like this, the product TESO:TU will not be released.

This is not ignoring the fact that TESO:TU is currently already available on PC - but the product itself is not fully released - why would DLC be available before TESO:TU is completely out available to all potential consumers?

Correct, however there is a flipside to this: as consumers, we should not pay for a product that we do not feel we need.

Continuing to pay for old content is also nonsense. Particularly when that content is now available free of charge.

However it would appear that ZOS is willing to sacrifice PC subs to ESO+ in order to gamble on console sales (which may indeed severely trump PC considerations). This is a business decision and I can look at it objectively and understand why they would do such a thing.

It just means that my game dollars will be spent elsewhere for the time being (or perhaps on more red wine)

newtinmpls

Well... on the teaser front it seems some of them outshine the games.

I still occasionlly watch the "live" Skyrim teaser - it was so darn well done I still wish they would make a movie.

Enodoc

Does anyone know if they've addressed the Wrothgar vs Orsinium name question yet?
Summary, if you can't be bothered to click - Orsinium is the city, Wrothgar is the region, so the zone should be called Wrothgar, not Orsinium.

Rosveen

Enodoc wrote: »

Does anyone know if they've addressed the Wrothgar vs Orsinium name question yet?
Summary, if you can't be bothered to click - Orsinium is the city, Wrothgar is the region, so the zone should be called Wrothgar, not Orsinium.

The DLC doesn't have to be named after the zone. I suspect they went with Orsinium in the end because it's more familiar and related to Orcs. Also, people kept calling it Hrothgar. A less confusing name is probably the way to go.

Enodoc

Rosveen wrote: »

Enodoc wrote: »

Does anyone know if they've addressed the Wrothgar vs Orsinium name question yet?
Summary, if you can't be bothered to click - Orsinium is the city, Wrothgar is the region, so the zone should be called Wrothgar, not Orsinium.

The DLC doesn't have to be named after the zone. I suspect they went with Orsinium in the end because it's more familiar and related to Orcs. Also, people kept calling it Hrothgar. A less confusing name is probably the way to go.

Mmm, I hadn't thought of that, and I could certainly agree with that. Call the DLC "Orsinium" and still keep the zone as named "Wrothgar". That works... in theory.

EJRose83

Let's join forces @Faulgor