stimpy986b14_ESO wrote: »you could have used a picture of Blade instead of referencing the Twilight prequels
Bookwyrm - The Thread KillerDon't talk to me! I'm a shrub. - Frozen Man
stimpy986b14_ESO wrote: »you could have used a picture of Blade instead of referencing the Twilight prequels
nova.terratrb14_ESO wrote: »I like it as is. There should be a drawback, being it fire damage or visual.
Bookwyrm - The Thread KillerDon't talk to me! I'm a shrub. - Frozen Man
stimpy986b14_ESO wrote: »you could have used a picture of Blade instead of referencing the Twilight prequels
Queen of the Dammned comes from the third novel of Anne Rice's The Vampire Chronicles series.
Don't mean to be a stickler, but man... The Vampire Chronicles and Twilight are worlds apart in quality. I'm thinking he wants a Redguard Vamp to look more like Aaaliyah did in the wayward film based off of that novel
stimpy986b14_ESO wrote: »you could have used a picture of Blade instead of referencing the Twilight prequels
I look albino white with a tint of purple. I think I was using the darkest skin available to redguards, before becoming a vampire.Psychobunni wrote: »How un-Redguard do they look after vamping out? Just curious
Earthwardzilvox_ESO wrote: »stimpy986b14_ESO wrote: »you could have used a picture of Blade instead of referencing the Twilight prequels
Hey, don't compare twilight to Queen of the Damned! They might both have portrayed vampires as sensual, but Queen of the Damned did it like adults, as opposed to horny teenagers. Also, no sparkles.
I thought there were only 2 films. But anyway, if you know where the image is from, what exactly is confusing you?
I thought there were only 2 films. But anyway, if you know where the image is from, what exactly is confusing you?
Third novel I intended to say. Either way, your attitude is ridiculous. And my point still stands
nova.terratrb14_ESO wrote: »I like it as is. There should be a drawback, being it fire damage or visual.
nova.terratrb14_ESO wrote: »I like it as is. There should be a drawback, being it fire damage or visual.
Going to agree. Visuals should turn some people away. It has to do with the overall aesthetic of the curse. It's part of the choice.
bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »nova.terratrb14_ESO wrote: »I like it as is. There should be a drawback, being it fire damage or visual.
Going to agree. Visuals should turn some people away. It has to do with the overall aesthetic of the curse. It's part of the choice.
thats not the issue with me. with me its lore. no other TES game turned every race stark white when turned.
bloodenragedb14_ESO wrote: »nova.terratrb14_ESO wrote: »I like it as is. There should be a drawback, being it fire damage or visual.
Going to agree. Visuals should turn some people away. It has to do with the overall aesthetic of the curse. It's part of the choice.
thats not the issue with me. with me its lore. no other TES game turned every race stark white when turned.
This is also a brand new disease, with different effects. Given the suspension of disbelief to allow for that, other alterations to how the curse changes your body should come hand in hand.