I keep seeing threads or responses in threads (and also in game in zone chats) about how the vocal minority is ruining this game.
This is NOT directed to those that are upset about ZoS listening too much or implementing too many changes that are seen to appease the vocal minority but this is directed to those that are directing their anger to people that are vocal and appear to be in a minority.
(I'll try to make this well organized so it's as clear as possible)
1) Who is in this vocal minority? Is there some test to see who is in the minority and who is in the majority?
1.1) Regarding the "vocal" part - if you don't count the non-vocal, how do you know that their views are in the minority or majority?
2) Are those complaining about the vocal minority themselves in a vocal minority or majority?
3) Can those in the minority offer solid or positive or constructive criticism and ideas for the direction of the game?
3.1) Is the minority always wrong? (if it can even be determined that they are in the minority as per 1 and 1.1))
3.1.1) How do you determine if they are wrong?
3.1.1.1) By numbers? If so, if this is only determined by "vocality" (similar to issues in 1.1) how do you know if the total majority of both vocal and nonvocal outnumbers the total minority both vocal and nonvocal?
Pointing the finger at the vocal minority does nothing but
- Add to more baseless complaining (and complaining about complainers no less (does that make it a "better" complaint?)).
- - Are there "better" complaints than others? Yes: They include:
- - - Being centered around something tangible/workable. (If not then what can be done about it?)
- - - Often times but not always: Offering a possible solution or direction. (If not then it inhibits moving forward)
- - - Have some importance, that is, being relevant to the issue. (If not, what's the freakin point?)
- Wastes time and detracts from real discussions about issues.
- Sets up an antagonistic relationship with those that might want to be vocal about something but may feel afraid to speak up because they might get labeled as one of those "vocal minority" posters that is seen as part of the reason why ESO has so many problems.
If ZoS:
- Has any idea of how to make a successful MMO (in general);
- Has the understanding of how to make this MMO in line with Elder Scrolls games and ES fans;
- Has the ability to think critically and place different values on feedback and ideas and put them in line with their vision and direction;
- Has the resources to do the above...
Then one would think of all the feedback that ZoS gets, regardless if it comes from a minority perspective or majority, louder or not, with more frequency or not, will get sorted out properly. If ZoS doesn't have the above then problems certainly will arise.
But quit hating on people for being vocal, if they argue a little or a lot, post a little or a lot, it doesn't matter (as long as they aren't being a jerk of course) - it's up to ZoS to figure it out based on the above.
And if they want to listen to nobody, or a few people, or only those on the forums, or send out mass polls to gather a numbers perspective, or whatever segment, that's up to them. It isn't any customers fault here for pushing anything on ZoS.
Also, ease up on adding the "minority" tag to this. Putting a negative stigma on whether or not something comes from a minority generally detracts from the real issues. In some cases, it might matter if it's a majority or minority but really it should be about the issue/topic itself and how it affects the game for better or worse. And yes that may involve numbers but again that's up to ZoS to decide, not for us to flame each other over and conveniently point the blame to the people that are in the "vocal minority".
Badge: Wall-of-Text GRANDMASTER
PvP: Patch Vs. Player
ZoSence (n.):
1) What is reasonable or comprehensive using ZoS logic. "That makes ZoSense"
2) Making zero sense. "That makes ZoSense"