PharmaChief wrote: »Dragons hopefully. And they will cost 2.000.000 gold offering 5% extra speed!!!
I, for one, would welcome option to mount captured a tamed Khajits.
smeeprocketnub19_ESO wrote: »senche tigers are almost as lore breaking as dragon mounts, so expect to see dragons at some point.
AlexDougherty wrote: »smeeprocketnub19_ESO wrote: »senche tigers are almost as lore breaking as dragon mounts, so expect to see dragons at some point.
Senche as mounts are nowhere near as lore breaking as dragons.
Senche as mounts for non-Khajiit are bad, but just because something is not recorded as happening doesn't mean it never did. I admit though, it would be rare beyond belief, so dozen's of us riding them, ooops.
Dragons on the other hand, would be a death knell for most of us, those who care could maybe except a dragon as a boss or quest giver (I would love either). But riding one whilst not being a dragonborn, that shatters the lore beyond repair (ie kills the fundaments the game is based on).
ers101284b14_ESO wrote: »Unicorns!
smeeprocketnub19_ESO wrote: »AlexDougherty wrote: »smeeprocketnub19_ESO wrote: »senche tigers are almost as lore breaking as dragon mounts, so expect to see dragons at some point.
Senche as mounts are nowhere near as lore breaking as dragons.
Senche as mounts for non-Khajiit are bad, but just because something is not recorded as happening doesn't mean it never did. I admit though, it would be rare beyond belief, so dozen's of us riding them, ooops.
Dragons on the other hand, would be a death knell for most of us, those who care could maybe except a dragon as a boss or quest giver (I would love either). But riding one whilst not being a dragonborn, that shatters the lore beyond repair (ie kills the fundaments the game is based on).
No, it is quite lore breaking. You just explained why. It was never common, and saying it might just have not been recorded, well hey, maybe people riding dragons wasn't recorded?
Senche tigers are a death knell for a number of people, so really it's relative to how much abuse to the lore one is ready to stomach.
AlexDougherty wrote: »smeeprocketnub19_ESO wrote: »AlexDougherty wrote: »smeeprocketnub19_ESO wrote: »senche tigers are almost as lore breaking as dragon mounts, so expect to see dragons at some point.
Senche as mounts are nowhere near as lore breaking as dragons.
Senche as mounts for non-Khajiit are bad, but just because something is not recorded as happening doesn't mean it never did. I admit though, it would be rare beyond belief, so dozen's of us riding them, ooops.
Dragons on the other hand, would be a death knell for most of us, those who care could maybe except a dragon as a boss or quest giver (I would love either). But riding one whilst not being a dragonborn, that shatters the lore beyond repair (ie kills the fundaments the game is based on).
No, it is quite lore breaking. You just explained why. It was never common, and saying it might just have not been recorded, well hey, maybe people riding dragons wasn't recorded?
Senche tigers are a death knell for a number of people, so really it's relative to how much abuse to the lore one is ready to stomach.
Maybe I wasn't coming across clearly (my fault), I wasn't saying it isn't lore breaking, just that it isn't as bad as dragons.
Dragons were being hunted down by the (Akaviri) Dragonguard (and later their inheritors the Blades), anyone riding them would have been noted, as would sightings of Dragons.
But yes, it's all a matter of degrees, and Dragons would be beyond the pale.