fromtesonlineb16_ESO wrote: »There's a BIG RED POST at the top of this forum, has been there for hours. I don't see a problem here.
Since there doesn't appear to be a patch being applied not sure what your comment about patch notes is about.
I came back from work at 4am and checked the forums first thing, saw that I only had 2 hours to play.
The big red message up top told me, and it was pretty noticeable.
Maybe instead of asking for better communication, people should keep track of how they deliver news?
I'd like to see a little graphical page with server names (all two of them ) and a little red light/green light indicator to show whether server is up or down.
Doesn't change much, just looks more professional and is more familiar to us MMO players, and also seems more friendly because it's in picture form.
Aside from the ETA's (which they will never supply and for good reason), all of that information exists on the forums already.
NateMiddleton wrote: »There is some good ideas being discussed here and I agree with most of them on the side of more info. Like ETSR (Estimated time of server return) would be great!
nerevarine1138 wrote: »NateMiddleton wrote: »There is some good ideas being discussed here and I agree with most of them on the side of more info. Like ETSR (Estimated time of server return) would be great!
No, it wouldn't.
When they give an ETA, people will flip out as soon as the servers come back a minute late or early. It's why most companies never give an estimate on server downtime.
nerevarine1138 wrote: »I have no idea why you would suggest using Twitter to distribute information instead of the official site (where we already get the info).
And they're never, ever, ever going to give an estimate for the total downtime. It's a dumb move for any company to do that, because the instant that they go over or under the time, these forums will be inundated with posts from people screaming about how ZOS lied about how long maintenance would take.
Elki_Wilderglas wrote: »nerevarine1138 wrote: »I have no idea why you would suggest using Twitter to distribute information instead of the official site (where we already get the info).
And they're never, ever, ever going to give an estimate for the total downtime. It's a dumb move for any company to do that, because the instant that they go over or under the time, these forums will be inundated with posts from people screaming about how ZOS lied about how long maintenance would take.
Twitter= Convenient alert which can be sent to mobile devices while people are at work/uni. Not everyone is signed into the forum while at work/uni. Personally the only reason I have a twitter is to get ZOS announcements. Sad but true. Not sure what the problem two of you people here have with "Why do we have to have TWO sources of information?!"
I'd like to give TESO subscribers more credit than to assume most of them don't understand the definiton of the word "estimate." The game has been online for over 2.5 months now. By now they're starting to get into the swing of things. They know that a small maintenance on Thurs night should go for an hour. Why not tell us in advance. They know a big patch takes about 4.5-5 hours, A slightly smaller one takes 4. I'm sure they're tracking the downtimes in the backrgound and comparing them against the sizes of the fixes included in the various gen maint, hotfixes, patches, and should at least be able to project some basic downtimes based on the size of the work being done on the megaserver. Factor in a safety net of what they would consider to be an approptiate margin of time(eg. 12.5%) in case something goes wrong, and they have a slight buffer to work with.
nerevarine1138 wrote: »Elki_Wilderglas wrote: »nerevarine1138 wrote: »I have no idea why you would suggest using Twitter to distribute information instead of the official site (where we already get the info).
And they're never, ever, ever going to give an estimate for the total downtime. It's a dumb move for any company to do that, because the instant that they go over or under the time, these forums will be inundated with posts from people screaming about how ZOS lied about how long maintenance would take.
Twitter= Convenient alert which can be sent to mobile devices while people are at work/uni. Not everyone is signed into the forum while at work/uni. Personally the only reason I have a twitter is to get ZOS announcements. Sad but true. Not sure what the problem two of you people here have with "Why do we have to have TWO sources of information?!"
I'd like to give TESO subscribers more credit than to assume most of them don't understand the definiton of the word "estimate." The game has been online for over 2.5 months now. By now they're starting to get into the swing of things. They know that a small maintenance on Thurs night should go for an hour. Why not tell us in advance. They know a big patch takes about 4.5-5 hours, A slightly smaller one takes 4. I'm sure they're tracking the downtimes in the backrgound and comparing them against the sizes of the fixes included in the various gen maint, hotfixes, patches, and should at least be able to project some basic downtimes based on the size of the work being done on the megaserver. Factor in a safety net of what they would consider to be an approptiate margin of time(eg. 12.5%) in case something goes wrong, and they have a slight buffer to work with.
If you want Twitter notification, go ahead. I don't use the platform, and I wasn't aware that so many people would consult it before consulting the official forums.
And I'd love to give subscribers more credit too. But let's be honest. The majority of people are looking for a reason to complain. If that reason ends up being that an estimated downtime was incorrect, they will use it to blow up the forums. This happens regularly with every other game, and this forum community has already shown itself to be worse than pretty much every other MMO forum I've ever seen. When you can't start a thread without it getting hijacked by the "Game is going f2p zomg!" crowd, do you really think that a missed maintenance ETA wouldn't cause a backlash?
nerevarine1138 wrote: »NateMiddleton wrote: »There is some good ideas being discussed here and I agree with most of them on the side of more info. Like ETSR (Estimated time of server return) would be great!
No, it wouldn't.
When they give an ETA, people will flip out as soon as the servers come back a minute late or early. It's why most companies never give an estimate on server downtime.
NateMiddleton wrote: »nerevarine1138 wrote: »NateMiddleton wrote: »There is some good ideas being discussed here and I agree with most of them on the side of more info. Like ETSR (Estimated time of server return) would be great!
No, it wouldn't.
When they give an ETA, people will flip out as soon as the servers come back a minute late or early. It's why most companies never give an estimate on server downtime.
From what I have seen I agree with you, however if it was updated on a rolling scale like when you download a file... 4 minutes to download....2 minutes to download...8 minutes to download EH! lol