Hlaren_shortsheath wrote: »pvp is dead. we need open world pvp
Hlaren_shortsheath wrote: »pvp is dead. we need open world pvp
Which would kill the entire game faster than you can say "cancel subscription".
Maybe you should make note of their level/rank vs your own.
I dont ever try to run, simply because nightblades have no way to actually run. That said, I've found that as a sub-50, engaging anyone v1 or above I'll typically only have a 30-40% chance of coming out of it alive (if it's a one on one fight), and engaging anyone v8-10 is a sure suicide.
Beyond that, one on one fights are almost impossible to come by in the first place. This game is all about zerg pvp, and the zerg mentality is that you stick with the crowd and avoid skirmishes.
Why don't you go back to Auriel's bow. The campaign that AD literally scared all of you pact and covenant players fromJust figured I'd make a point to laugh publicly at the AD folks in/guesting in Wabbajack. I've been at it all day today, and while I met a few (3-4) that stayed to fight... 90% of the AD I've attacked today literally just run for their lives immediately upon bein attacked, only to turn and fight when the numbers are 3/1. It cracks me up...
You can see where all the "skilled" DAoC players went, faction wise. HAHAHA
Thanks for the laughs.
JoseDelgadoCub17_ESO wrote: »Why don't you go back to Auriel's bow. The campaign that AD literally scared all of you pact and covenant players fromJust figured I'd make a point to laugh publicly at the AD folks in/guesting in Wabbajack. I've been at it all day today, and while I met a few (3-4) that stayed to fight... 90% of the AD I've attacked today literally just run for their lives immediately upon bein attacked, only to turn and fight when the numbers are 3/1. It cracks me up...
You can see where all the "skilled" DAoC players went, faction wise. HAHAHA
Thanks for the laughs.
Hlaren_shortsheath wrote: »according to YOU and only YOU.
as soon as a alliance gets strong and dominates a campaign every one leaves that campaign. and now we simply have only campaigns that dominate AD, EP, or DC. i stay true to my campaign.
Hlaren_shortsheath wrote: »pvp is dead. we need open world pvp
yea, I don't mind fair fights. I don't know what the numbers have to be for AD to get a lock but until recently I've always been seeing comparable numbers in groups. I will freely admit I left bloodthorn weeks ago because how am I supposed to learn what to cast and where to cast and situational awareness when the ONLY situation I was facing was ZERG??! There's only so many ways you can die when ten different enemies are attacking you and you have no backup.cisadanepajsuxrwb17_ESO wrote: »Hlaren_shortsheath wrote: »according to YOU and only YOU.
as soon as a alliance gets strong and dominates a campaign every one leaves that campaign. and now we simply have only campaigns that dominate AD, EP, or DC. i stay true to my campaign.
I'll clarify this. As AD has practically dominated every campaign aside from one or two, it is actually sad to see us so dominating and have enemies leave. Now that Wabbajack seems to be the most competitive, ex Auriel Bow ADs has started pouring in and looks like slowly but surely EP and DC will move out in search of greener pastures once again.
The only ones who can fix this cycle are the devs. It is just the fact that AD in full force cant be outzerged by anybody, we seem to have an endless supply of players at times.
PvDoor/Walls are not fun for anybody
JoseDelgadoCub17_ESO wrote: »I stopped PvPing since all you Auriel's Bow and Bloodthorn players came to Wabbajack and ruined it.
Just figured I'd make a point to laugh publicly at the AD folks in/guesting in Wabbajack. I've been at it all day today, and while I met a few (3-4) that stayed to fight... 90% of the AD I've attacked today literally just run for their lives immediately upon bein attacked, only to turn and fight when the numbers are 3/1. It cracks me up...
You can see where all the "skilled" DAoC players went, faction wise. HAHAHA
Thanks for the laughs.