WhiteScythe wrote: »Enough with the hate imo - people will play how they want to play and not meta/min max every damn thing in this game.
RealLoveBVB wrote: »WhiteScythe wrote: »Enough with the hate imo - people will play how they want to play and not meta/min max every damn thing in this game.
Btw: When the HA Sorc was introduced and super OP, I saw things like this in craglorn:
LFM vAS+2 4dd HA sorc only.
So at this time the one bar users were the ones locking other players out.
Now that they got nerfed and are just average dps again, they need to rely on 2-bar dds again. Ironic.
yes!RealLoveBVB wrote: »"... Ironic.
RealLoveBVB wrote: »WhiteScythe wrote: »Enough with the hate imo - people will play how they want to play and not meta/min max every damn thing in this game.
Btw: When the HA Sorc was introduced and super OP, I saw things like this in craglorn:
LFM vAS+2 4dd HA sorc only.
So at this time the one bar users were the ones locking other players out.
Now that they got nerfed and are just average dps again, they need to rely on 2-bar dds again. Ironic.
Even so, not too many days ago, I saw a vAS+2 run in the group finder, and it said: "No Oakenbar." I joined anyway, and they let me stay (HA Oakensoul). When we started the fight, I had to move out, but before that, I asked the raid leader in the group chat: "Are you gatekeeping HA for this? Two-bar players with 20k DPS? (My DPS was 65k)" I simply moved out... let them play with two bars.yes!RealLoveBVB wrote: »"... Ironic.
twisttop138 wrote: »frogthroat wrote: »
Pretty sweet April fools day post.
RealLoveBVB wrote: »RealLoveBVB wrote: »WhiteScythe wrote: »Enough with the hate imo - people will play how they want to play and not meta/min max every damn thing in this game.
Btw: When the HA Sorc was introduced and super OP, I saw things like this in craglorn:
LFM vAS+2 4dd HA sorc only.
So at this time the one bar users were the ones locking other players out.
Now that they got nerfed and are just average dps again, they need to rely on 2-bar dds again. Ironic.
Even so, not too many days ago, I saw a vAS+2 run in the group finder, and it said: "No Oakenbar." I joined anyway, and they let me stay (HA Oakensoul). When we started the fight, I had to move out, but before that, I asked the raid leader in the group chat: "Are you gatekeeping HA for this? Two-bar players with 20k DPS? (My DPS was 65k)" I simply moved out... let them play with two bars.yes!RealLoveBVB wrote: »"... Ironic.
You make it hard to understand what you write.
But I understood it like this, that the fight engaged, everyone started to parse, you saw on hodor, that you had a awesome dps of 65k and left, before the first jump right?
You can judge better over your dps, if you do a full fight. Because you wont stay on that 65k dps...and besides that: players usuallys hit for 100-120k in the first 10% before the first jump. 65k is not even average and the reason, why some groups don't want HA builds.
RealLoveBVB wrote: »RealLoveBVB wrote: »WhiteScythe wrote: »Enough with the hate imo - people will play how they want to play and not meta/min max every damn thing in this game.
Btw: When the HA Sorc was introduced and super OP, I saw things like this in craglorn:
LFM vAS+2 4dd HA sorc only.
So at this time the one bar users were the ones locking other players out.
Now that they got nerfed and are just average dps again, they need to rely on 2-bar dds again. Ironic.
Even so, not too many days ago, I saw a vAS+2 run in the group finder, and it said: "No Oakenbar." I joined anyway, and they let me stay (HA Oakensoul). When we started the fight, I had to move out, but before that, I asked the raid leader in the group chat: "Are you gatekeeping HA for this? Two-bar players with 20k DPS? (My DPS was 65k)" I simply moved out... let them play with two bars.yes!RealLoveBVB wrote: »"... Ironic.
You make it hard to understand what you write.
But I understood it like this, that the fight engaged, everyone started to parse, you saw on hodor, that you had a awesome dps of 65k and left, before the first jump right?
You can judge better over your dps, if you do a full fight. Because you wont stay on that 65k dps...and besides that: players usuallys hit for 100-120k in the first 10% before the first jump. 65k is not even average and the reason, why some groups don't want HA builds.
If I only parse 65k before the first jump, I will not just leave the group—I will leave and delete my entire account.
I can maintain 65k in a regular vAS+2 run most of the time (with pugs, of course).
And what I saw during the time I stayed in the fight was 2bar players trying to complete something they could do with 1bar but not with 2bars. Doing 20k or 30k max on 2bars is a shame—it's a mess. And they ONLY do it because they have to if they want to join other groups. With just 1bar and only heavy attacks, they would easily keep 40k.
RealLoveBVB wrote: »RealLoveBVB wrote: »RealLoveBVB wrote: »WhiteScythe wrote: »Enough with the hate imo - people will play how they want to play and not meta/min max every damn thing in this game.
Btw: When the HA Sorc was introduced and super OP, I saw things like this in craglorn:
LFM vAS+2 4dd HA sorc only.
So at this time the one bar users were the ones locking other players out.
Now that they got nerfed and are just average dps again, they need to rely on 2-bar dds again. Ironic.
Even so, not too many days ago, I saw a vAS+2 run in the group finder, and it said: "No Oakenbar." I joined anyway, and they let me stay (HA Oakensoul). When we started the fight, I had to move out, but before that, I asked the raid leader in the group chat: "Are you gatekeeping HA for this? Two-bar players with 20k DPS? (My DPS was 65k)" I simply moved out... let them play with two bars.yes!RealLoveBVB wrote: »"... Ironic.
You make it hard to understand what you write.
But I understood it like this, that the fight engaged, everyone started to parse, you saw on hodor, that you had a awesome dps of 65k and left, before the first jump right?
You can judge better over your dps, if you do a full fight. Because you wont stay on that 65k dps...and besides that: players usuallys hit for 100-120k in the first 10% before the first jump. 65k is not even average and the reason, why some groups don't want HA builds.
If I only parse 65k before the first jump, I will not just leave the group—I will leave and delete my entire account.
I can maintain 65k in a regular vAS+2 run most of the time (with pugs, of course).
And what I saw during the time I stayed in the fight was 2bar players trying to complete something they could do with 1bar but not with 2bars. Doing 20k or 30k max on 2bars is a shame—it's a mess. And they ONLY do it because they have to if they want to join other groups. With just 1bar and only heavy attacks, they would easily keep 40k.
Any logs?
RealLoveBVB wrote: »You need to learn how to read logs. Guys with low dps in high end groups are most likely the MVPs, as they are the ones with dps-support sets and playing mechs.
If you have to go to portals or have to interrupt stuff, then of course you won't make high dps- but you made sure others can parse.
If they all go into the HA build, they will perform better for sure. ESO Log
Oh wait... they’re all support DPS carrying the healers. Okay! My bad.
There's always someone getting carried by others.
HA Oakensoul build will NOT be in last place. 100% sure.
tomofhyrule wrote: »
- Raid leads are at liberty to take whoever they want. Because of U33 and U35, a lot of the better raid leads left so a lot of the remaining ones are those who… think they’re better than they are. A good raid leads will just look at a parse and let players play. That’s how new tactics are found. Bad raid leads will look at content creators and logs to find out what the best possible thing is, and then demand exactly that. Why would they want a DD who can do 120k on Necro, when they could have the meta Arcanist doing 90k? Wait, what? You mean that just forcing someone to copy a build isn’t going to automatically make them be the best at it, and some people may even be able to do better on a non-standard build?
The important thing is to be on the same page as your group. If you have a raid lead who is permissive, then by all means. But if yours is demanding, then you need to either submit to their demands or not run with them. And since random PuGs are random, you can’t guarantee what you’ll get… and they can’t guarantee that you’re a pro Oakensoul user instead of just someone who put it on because you want to ignore teamwork either.
It’s the standard team thing: you can do anything solo, but in group content you need to play as a team. I always like to think of an Olympic relay race (also because it’s a funny head image) - if your whole team says “hey, wouldn’t it be funny if we all ran the relay in 18th century ballgowns and showed that we could still win even if we looked like Marie Antoinette?” and then you do it, great! But if you go up to a group in their super-speed leotards and you’re in a powdered wig and panniers, people are obviously going to eject you from the team.
I agree with you on that 100%. But, saying that is not the same as saying; "HA is bad and will do less DPS than everyone in 2-bars." You are 100% correct.
But here's what I would add: "If the whole group has equal or higher skill than the HA player", there would be no reason to gatekeep Oakensoul players. And if the team is "not bad," those players will complete any HM content in this game.
tomofhyrule wrote: »
- Raid leads are at liberty to take whoever they want. Because of U33 and U35, a lot of the better raid leads left so a lot of the remaining ones are those who… think they’re better than they are. A good raid leads will just look at a parse and let players play. That’s how new tactics are found. Bad raid leads will look at content creators and logs to find out what the best possible thing is, and then demand exactly that. Why would they want a DD who can do 120k on Necro, when they could have the meta Arcanist doing 90k? Wait, what? You mean that just forcing someone to copy a build isn’t going to automatically make them be the best at it, and some people may even be able to do better on a non-standard build?
The important thing is to be on the same page as your group. If you have a raid lead who is permissive, then by all means. But if yours is demanding, then you need to either submit to their demands or not run with them. And since random PuGs are random, you can’t guarantee what you’ll get… and they can’t guarantee that you’re a pro Oakensoul user instead of just someone who put it on because you want to ignore teamwork either.
It’s the standard team thing: you can do anything solo, but in group content you need to play as a team. I always like to think of an Olympic relay race (also because it’s a funny head image) - if your whole team says “hey, wouldn’t it be funny if we all ran the relay in 18th century ballgowns and showed that we could still win even if we looked like Marie Antoinette?” and then you do it, great! But if you go up to a group in their super-speed leotards and you’re in a powdered wig and panniers, people are obviously going to eject you from the team.
I wanted to address a couple of your points here.
1. I disagree with your definition of good and bad raid leads. First of all, just parsing on the dummy while a useful tool tells me very little about how a player will perform in content. I do not look at dummy parses when putting my groups together.
2. ESO Logs are a tool that is often used incorrectly. A raid lead that just rosters and builds setups based on ESO logs without taking into consideration the level of players they're leading is doomed for failure, but a good raid lead playing with highly skilled players can look at those logs and translate them into their own run. I think more raid leads should aspire to being able to do that, especially if they wish to play sweatier content.
I do agree with your conclusions. Be on the same page with the people you're running with. As long as everyone has similar expectations you're a lot more likely to be successful.
Essentially ZOS's official stance is "anything goes," which is acceptable... assuming you're in a group which also thinks that. Unfortunately, there are a lot of raid leads that can't deviate (I've seen leads put up non-HM farm runs of trials where they demand specific classes for everyone, everyone needs a trash/boss setup, supports need to change to a completely different build each boss kind of thing that you'd only need for running the trifecta. For a farm run).Q: Thoughts about hybridization. A lot of the community isn't a fan of builds all being funneled in one direction.
A: Heard. Why do you feel you have to run exactly what the meta is.
(Questioner answers: "the creators show the best of the best").
Back to Rich: You don't need 120k DPS to do a trial. The meta can change. There's lots of builds that aren't necessarily "the most viable". We've watched this over the years and as soon as someone breaks a record, everyone changes their build. That's lessened past few years because we've been focused on making things consistent. Just because a creator says it's best, is it actually mandatory? I would argue it's not. ALSO, pay attention to Global Reveal in April.
Even so, not too many days ago, I saw a vAS+2 run in the group finder, and it said: "No Oakenbar." I joined anyway, and they let me stay (HA Oakensoul). When we started the fight, I had to move out, but before that, I asked the raid leader in the group chat: "Are you gatekeeping HA for this? Two-bar players with 20k DPS? (My DPS was 65k)" I simply moved out... let them play with two bars.
DenverRalphy wrote: »But they're pushing it when it comes to running HM. And I don't know anybody who'll run an Oak build in a vet Trial prog group.
alpha_synuclein wrote: »Even so, not too many days ago, I saw a vAS+2 run in the group finder, and it said: "No Oakenbar." I joined anyway, and they let me stay (HA Oakensoul). When we started the fight, I had to move out, but before that, I asked the raid leader in the group chat: "Are you gatekeeping HA for this? Two-bar players with 20k DPS? (My DPS was 65k)" I simply moved out... let them play with two bars.
Does it ever occur to you that people can simply just not like your attitude?
alpha_synuclein wrote: »DenverRalphy wrote: »But they're pushing it when it comes to running HM. And I don't know anybody who'll run an Oak build in a vet Trial prog group.
In vet progs there are many oaken players and a lot of them is doing well enough.
HMs are trickier, I wouldn't go higher than KA HM for most. But earlier ones are very much an option, as well as easier trifectas.
Renato90085 wrote: »alpha_synuclein wrote: »DenverRalphy wrote: »But they're pushing it when it comes to running HM. And I don't know anybody who'll run an Oak build in a vet Trial prog group.
In vet progs there are many oaken players and a lot of them is doing well enough.
HMs are trickier, I wouldn't go higher than KA HM for most. But earlier ones are very much an option, as well as easier trifectas.
One bar still can do VKA/VSS/VCR(are they fix bug?) hard mode
But only can finished hm because they lost aoe dmg so can't clean mobs in time
maybe GH still can did,but you need found 3tank and 2 healer who want have 12min pain for a title