Probably different wording to say the same:

'Everything you see, hear and interact with is ours, and rescinding your access to 'ours' or cessation of 'ours' altogether can occur at any time, for any reason, with little to no [credible means of] recourse. If something awry happens to 'yours' as a consequence of 'ours' however that is 100% on you kthxbye'.

Hapexamendios wrote: »

That'd be good to know. I live in Japan and agreement was in Japanese. I can speak and read the language to an extent, but that agreement was beyond my level.

It was in legal speak, so no one can read it no matter the language.

Sleepsin wrote: »

It was in legal speak, so no one can read it no matter the language.

They're often intended to be difficult for most to understand but they're not incomprehensible. Assuming you can essentially commit the entire document to memory - possible for some - and piece together how all the parts royally shaft you in some fashion.

On the plus side, courts take that into account when disagreements make it there and often void such agreements.

Everything is as usual:
- we are monitoring you with the help of artificial intelligence
- if you were banned by mistake, then this mistake was made by you
- refusal to file a lawsuit against the company if you ever start the game
- you did not buy the game, but a limited right to play the game, which can be revoked unilaterally without explaining the reason
... and many more standard things that are in almost any agreement
just kidding (not really)