The current campaign names are a reminder as to the last time they changed something in Cyrodiil. These campaigns were named three years ago with the Greymoor release which was just before ZOS completely abandoned PVP under the excuse of performance work preventing any future changes. Do people still buy that line?

Gray Host and Blackreach still pop lock during prime time, while Ravenwatch and Icereach sit mostly empty 24/7, reminding us that their respective rulesets are a failure (sorry if you like them, but they are dead camps). Would be really cool if they trimmed down to 3 camps with one clear and balanced ruleset, not this confusing spread out mess.

Don't even care which ruleset, just pick one and balance it.

KiltMaster wrote: »

IDK if they're hurting anyone to have an under 50 and a no-cp, no-proc campaign, respectively.

I'd argue that does hurt players when they queue into dead camps then can't find any actual PvP, or have no idea what build to put together because the rulesets are all over the place. These sort of things leave a sour taste that turns potential PvPers away. The obsolete names are kinda part of the same problem, someone sees names from 3-4 years ago with dead populations across, may come to the conclusion that ZOS doesn't care about PvP, so neither should they.

Yeah, that's fair. I do know guilds who run in Icereach tho to teach new players to pvp. I also know they'll delete their toon when it becomes level 50 and do the same thing with a new one. I don't really have a strong opinion on this, really, the point of my post was campaign names.