TheEndBringer wrote: »Eh.. It's a little too easy to get into keeps as it is for small groups. I'd rather have a better chance at defending a keep by myself rather than pointlessly hitting a siege bubble till they break in.
TheEndBringer wrote: »Eh.. It's a little too easy to get into keeps as it is for small groups. I'd rather have a better chance at defending a keep by myself rather than pointlessly hitting a siege bubble till they break in.
If a faction ignores a burst keep for the 37 years it takes for one person to flip a flag (twice), then they deserve to lose it. However, I'd love to see unflagged keeps instantly boot all enemies inside, especially the troll groups who indefinitely stall the battle running around the walls and towers.I agree. IMHO it should be near impossible to take an undefended keep with less than 12 people. I have PVDed inner keeps solo, and that is something that just shouldn't be able to happen.
xylena_lazarow wrote: »If a faction ignores a burst keep for the 37 years it takes for one person to flip a flag (twice), then they deserve to lose it. However, I'd love to see unflagged keeps instantly boot all enemies inside, especially the troll groups who indefinitely stall the battle running around the walls and towers.I agree. IMHO it should be near impossible to take an undefended keep with less than 12 people. I have PVDed inner keeps solo, and that is something that just shouldn't be able to happen.
xylena_lazarow wrote: »If a faction ignores a burst keep for the 37 years it takes for one person to flip a flag (twice), then they deserve to lose it. However, I'd love to see unflagged keeps instantly boot all enemies inside, especially the troll groups who indefinitely stall the battle running around the walls and towers.I agree. IMHO it should be near impossible to take an undefended keep with less than 12 people. I have PVDed inner keeps solo, and that is something that just shouldn't be able to happen.