As we know Eso is being reviewed and it isnt getting as high as Skyrim, but to me i think the reviews are a little misguided, i see alot of the reviewers stating not to look at this game as an elder scrolls game but just a new MMO, however they keep referring back to previous eder scrolls games for a comparison and im like, the fudge! They are contradicting them selves on a massive scale, if I was being fair for an mmo it gets an 8.5/10 its a good game, its fluid, character models are gorgeous, hiccups obviously and many glitches. But the past elder scrolls games had many bugs too but they get 9.7/10 so whats the difference between this elder scrolls game and the others, other than its onine.... I know, the subscription fee, we are paying extra for a slightly broken game, to be honest i have no problem with a subscription fee, but part of me feels the reviewers do, and even though its not graphically superior to Skyrim, oh there i go referring it to past elder scrolls games.. ill refrase, its probably, to me the best looking mmo out there next to GW2 but reviewers dont see that, they see the sequel to Skyrim, or prequel, whatever and i think thats a shame, because i dont think they understand what they are reviewing most of the time. If i was going to try and get someone who liked the elder scrolls series to play it even though they looked at the reviews, i would just say, try it man or dont. Just dont take the word of reviewers when its a personal experience to the individual, that is all.