Maintenance for the week of November 18:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – November 18
• ESO Store and Account System for maintenance – November 19, 9:00AM EST (14:00 UTC) - 6:00PM EST (23:00 UTC)
• PlayStation®: EU megaserver for maintenance – November 19, 23:00 UTC (6:00PM EST) - November 20, 17:00 UTC (12:00PM EST)
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/668861
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – November 18
• ESO Store and Account System for maintenance – November 19, 9:00AM EST (14:00 UTC) - 6:00PM EST (23:00 UTC)
• PlayStation®: EU megaserver for maintenance – November 19, 23:00 UTC (6:00PM EST) - November 20, 17:00 UTC (12:00PM EST)
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/668861
Alliance disbalance
Suligost
✭✭✭
Ehh, another misery of 3 sides and lack of alliance restrictions. I made a thread about making new pvp zone and also want to say that number of Dominium in no CP is outrageous and there is no lock untill full faction hop on server. IC, Cyro it doesnt matter. Im playing on Blue side but must say that reds have even worse situation. We can beat like 3 guys more when it comes to a bit more competetive resource spammers but not when it comes to twice numbers. Its not M&B/Mordhau, here is spam of CC/heales and every person counts -.-
Edited by Suligost on 15 April 2020 08:02 0
-
Mr_Walker✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭*yawn*
Sure, it's because of the lack of alliance locking, must be why GH on Xbone NA has been 3 bar red vs 1 or 0 bar everyone else.
0 -
Suligost✭✭✭Yes yes yes, great that you agree with obviousness but why then any topic on forum suggesting new PvP zone is getting shred by Cyrodiil defenders... are people on this forum aware but super *** at same time (how much does Cyro need to stack up problems to get people think) -.-Edited by Suligost on 15 April 2020 07:490
-
idk✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Imbalance will always be a thing with this PvP design except when all three alliances are pop capped. Cyrodiil was not designed to be truly competitive PvP all the time. It will not and should not have a mechanism that artificially reduces the population cap because one or two alliances cannot muster enough players who want to play in that alliance at that time. I suggest you get over it or find a different PvP.0 -
Suligost✭✭✭Imbalance will always be a thing with this PvP design except when all three alliances are pop capped. Cyrodiil was not designed to be truly competitive PvP all the time. It will not and should not have a mechanism that artificially reduces the population cap because one or two alliances cannot muster enough players who want to play in that alliance at that time. I suggest you get over it or find a different PvP.
Ehhhhhhh, same problem with thinking. ESO doesnt have different PvP except Cyro and IC. Duels? Nothing out of it, if they made cool arena/tournaments around it then maybe but set ups for 1v1 are absurdly powerfull (wouldnt work propably). So get over it, Cyro fine, wont make ZOS want to change anything... start from your attitude and if you dont bother about PvP dont open mouth in topics for people that want changes in PvP.Edited by Suligost on 15 April 2020 08:021 -
Joinovikova✭✭✭✭main problem is removing faction lock and boost winning faction by zero reason bonuses like scroll bonuses emp bonus enemy keep bonus, so many player rolled to winning faction ( totaly understandable why play on debufffed faction whith sugnificantly low population.... Unfortenetly 80% of time is non CP cyro (PC EU) unplayable for non AD players, because more then 50% of players is on AD side with all posible boosts...IF Zos not start supoort weaker factio with bonuses to motivate players to play.. Cyro will be soon like IC.. Ghost zone..1
