I would have held off on the large and manor sized houses until a future incremental. Give people time to get used to the design interface and work on the new crafting and experiment in smaller spaces. Give ZOS a little bit more time to work on the lag issues with the larger spaces.
But they're obviously very eager to monetize everything on day one. At least everything the statistics tell them to...
I would have held off on the large and manor sized houses until a future incremental. Give people time to get used to the design interface and work on the new crafting and experiment in smaller spaces. Give ZOS a little bit more time to work on the lag issues with the larger spaces.
But they're obviously very eager to monetize everything on day one. At least everything the statistics tell them to...
I can just imagine the complaints from the wealthy few if they'd been told to make do with a smaller house and that they'd have to wait to launder their millions!
Storage should have been included.
Time, manpower, memory, and financial domains aside it should still be on the future even if only 3 % of the plays base use it.
What percent of player base beats VMSA, DSA, Hard Mode MOL you found the developmental time and resources for those things and I would venture at least two of three are under 3%.
NewBlacksmurf wrote: »Seems the decision to place housing in the next update was the error that came from those year ahead plans. So the issue occurred as far back as late 2015 to early 2016.
Anytime you say you had to make decisions to get something released, you're far from being ready to release it
willlienellson wrote: »I love how 3 things is "everything I ever wanted". How cute.
mandrakethebard_ESO wrote: »You left out an important option to this poll, THAT THE HOUSING IS GOOD AS IT IS AND EXTRA STORAGE IS NOT NEEDED.
I do NOT require extra storage at all, and I'm kinda disgusted at the greed of people who want to gripe about getting a really cool update because they want just one more thing that is not needed.
glitchmaster999 wrote: »Hands down for the price it should be included, high cost for two functions is kinda ludicrous. I would pay that if they had storage and proper vendors...