Daz_dingoeb17_ESO wrote: »Such a low move on Zos part.
Daz_dingoeb17_ESO wrote: »Yep, as it seems i dont have to admit i was wrong.
This is the beginning of the end for master Crafters all around tamriel. It was a good 2 year run but now it seems crafters will have to choose between buying stuff they like from the crown store or buy stuff they need in game to be competitive in their craft.
Such a low move on Zos part. Plus the fact that you can only craft it with mimic stones is a sad excuse to make us buy them.
I hope crafters are smarter than that and avoid this like the plague but since people will want to make money out of it they will buy it like sheep. Its all a matter of psychology. There will always be the marketing team targeting those fools. Well i dont intend to be one of those this time around im sorry.
See, as a crafter myself, I'm very torn on this. On the one hand, I really want to tell ZOS to buzz off with the idea of a crown store exclusive motif. On the other hand though... it would bother me tremendously to see a style on the UI that I can't craft because I was too stubborn to pay for enough crowns (That I can sparingly afford) to buy the motif and be able to make it for my friends. I don't know what to do between those two thoughts.
The Grim Harlequin is going to be exclusive to the Crown Store. However, purchasing the Grim Harlequin will net you 54 Mimic Stones, which you can use to craft gear (including the Grim Harlequin). You can use this crafted gear to deconstruct and have a chance to get a Grinstone - the Grim Harlequin style item. All this can be traded, too, if you wish.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/comment/3440245#Comment_3440245
It is exclusive.
ThePaleItalian wrote: »Its 2,200 crowns. Just a heads up.
SantieClaws wrote: »Someone somewhere thinks they really understand the mind of the travellers in Tamriel and what they are willing to do and are willing to pay. This one she would request a significant re-evaluation of this thought process
Well now that creates a new dilemma. To refuse to buy, on principle, because this is not a path that we wish to encourage ZOS to continue down, and is a motif really worth as much as an entire DLC? Or to give in and just buy it, because it's not as expensive as we thought it would be, and we bought crowns on sale and/or have a crown stash from subbing, so it's not thaaat much money?
Hmmm...
Well now that creates a new dilemma. To refuse to buy, on principle, because this is not a path that we wish to encourage ZOS to continue down,
Well now that creates a new dilemma. To refuse to buy, on principle, because this is not a path that we wish to encourage ZOS to continue down, and is a motif really worth as much as an entire DLC? Or to give in and just buy it, because it's not as expensive as we thought it would be, and we bought crowns on sale and/or have a crown stash from subbing, so it's not thaaat much money?
Hmmm...
lordrichter wrote: »Well now that creates a new dilemma. To refuse to buy, on principle, because this is not a path that we wish to encourage ZOS to continue down, and is a motif really worth as much as an entire DLC? Or to give in and just buy it, because it's not as expensive as we thought it would be, and we bought crowns on sale and/or have a crown stash from subbing, so it's not thaaat much money?
Hmmm...
Think of them like a puppy. They are thinking that it is OK to piddle on the floor. As long as we encourage them to piddle on the floor, they will continue to think it is OK. The best way to train the puppy is by rewarding good behavior, so when they do not piddle on the floor, they get a reward. Eventually, the puppy stops piddling on the floor.
TELL ZOS TO STOP PIDDLING ON THE FLOOR BY NOT REWARDING THEM WHEN THEY DO!
KingYogi415 wrote: »Buy mimic stones then sell them????
WTF
P2W confirmed
KingYogi415 wrote: »Buy mimic stones then sell them????
WTF
P2W confirmed
What exactly are you winning by buying a motif?
I can haz motif! I wins game!
Not that I approve of crown exclusive motifs, but c'mon... P2W? Really?
Peekachu99 wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »Peekachu99 wrote: »My God, they're running a business, they need to make money. Game chuggs along half the time and you want to deprive them of more cosmetic-based income?
No, they do not need to make money. Many business fail, and properly so. Making money is the reward for doing something of value, it is not the fulfillment of a need. They remain a successful business when the reward is greater than the cost of being in business. If they cannot manage to do that, they they should be going out of business.
Further, it is not the responsibility of any of us to keep them in business. You did not say exactly this, but your statement strongly implies that we have a responsibility to give them money so they will fix their game. I am sure they appreciate the donations, and people can spend their money as they see fit, but we are just consumers and they are the business. We are not part of the team, and we are not investors. They have to provide value for the money that they ask for. As consumers, we can toss around our money as we want, but in the end, it is not our responsibility to keep them in business. If enough people are not willing to buy what they are selling, at the price they are selling it at, then they rightfully deserve to go out of business, or move to sell a product that has more value.
I'd agree with you if this wasn't an online game that had exorbitant infrastructure costs necessary for you to enjoy (or hate) it. Do you expect them to provide this for backend free? Who's the charity now? Your argument is confusing and you sound as if you expect them to keep the servers on simply because they have earned your trust as a consumer--only that only works if you, the consumer, actually pay money to continue ongoing services and development. A good business is more of a mutual exchange, rather than one party emptying its pockets for the enjoyment of the other.
ZoS provide a product, we as a consumer determine if it's worth our investment. I'm not suggesting that we owe them anything. I am saying that I see crown store motifs as a fine investment, and do not see it as the "slippery-slope, pay-to-win" apocalypse.
KingYogi415 wrote: »Buy mimic stones then sell them????
WTF
P2W confirmed
What exactly are you winning by buying a motif?
I can haz motif! I wins game!
Not that I approve of crown exclusive motifs, but c'mon... P2W? Really?
ThePaleItalian wrote: »Its 2,200 crowns. Just a heads up.
Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »Its a bit annoying that its Crown Store Exclusive but. Its only 2200 crowns and not only do you get quality armor (Im quite impressed with it) but you get 54 Mimic Stones. Which is a better deal than the 2400 you would spend on the stand alone 54 Mimic Stones in the Crown Store.
Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »Its a bit annoying that its Crown Store Exclusive but. Its only 2200 crowns and not only do you get quality armor (Im quite impressed with it) but you get 54 Mimic Stones. Which is a better deal than the 2400 you would spend on the stand alone 54 Mimic Stones in the Crown Store.
And it doesnt make you wonder?
Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »Its a bit annoying that its Crown Store Exclusive but. Its only 2200 crowns and not only do you get quality armor (Im quite impressed with it) but you get 54 Mimic Stones. Which is a better deal than the 2400 you would spend on the stand alone 54 Mimic Stones in the Crown Store.
And it doesnt make you wonder?
Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »Peekachu99 wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »Peekachu99 wrote: »My God, they're running a business, they need to make money. Game chuggs along half the time and you want to deprive them of more cosmetic-based income?
No, they do not need to make money. Many business fail, and properly so. Making money is the reward for doing something of value, it is not the fulfillment of a need. They remain a successful business when the reward is greater than the cost of being in business. If they cannot manage to do that, they they should be going out of business.
Further, it is not the responsibility of any of us to keep them in business. You did not say exactly this, but your statement strongly implies that we have a responsibility to give them money so they will fix their game. I am sure they appreciate the donations, and people can spend their money as they see fit, but we are just consumers and they are the business. We are not part of the team, and we are not investors. They have to provide value for the money that they ask for. As consumers, we can toss around our money as we want, but in the end, it is not our responsibility to keep them in business. If enough people are not willing to buy what they are selling, at the price they are selling it at, then they rightfully deserve to go out of business, or move to sell a product that has more value.
I'd agree with you if this wasn't an online game that had exorbitant infrastructure costs necessary for you to enjoy (or hate) it. Do you expect them to provide this for backend free? Who's the charity now? Your argument is confusing and you sound as if you expect them to keep the servers on simply because they have earned your trust as a consumer--only that only works if you, the consumer, actually pay money to continue ongoing services and development. A good business is more of a mutual exchange, rather than one party emptying its pockets for the enjoyment of the other.
ZoS provide a product, we as a consumer determine if it's worth our investment. I'm not suggesting that we owe them anything. I am saying that I see crown store motifs as a fine investment, and do not see it as the "slippery-slope, pay-to-win" apocalypse.
So theyre too big to fail is what youre getting at?
Peekachu99 wrote: »Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »Peekachu99 wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »Peekachu99 wrote: »My God, they're running a business, they need to make money. Game chuggs along half the time and you want to deprive them of more cosmetic-based income?
No, they do not need to make money. Many business fail, and properly so. Making money is the reward for doing something of value, it is not the fulfillment of a need. They remain a successful business when the reward is greater than the cost of being in business. If they cannot manage to do that, they they should be going out of business.
Further, it is not the responsibility of any of us to keep them in business. You did not say exactly this, but your statement strongly implies that we have a responsibility to give them money so they will fix their game. I am sure they appreciate the donations, and people can spend their money as they see fit, but we are just consumers and they are the business. We are not part of the team, and we are not investors. They have to provide value for the money that they ask for. As consumers, we can toss around our money as we want, but in the end, it is not our responsibility to keep them in business. If enough people are not willing to buy what they are selling, at the price they are selling it at, then they rightfully deserve to go out of business, or move to sell a product that has more value.
I'd agree with you if this wasn't an online game that had exorbitant infrastructure costs necessary for you to enjoy (or hate) it. Do you expect them to provide this for backend free? Who's the charity now? Your argument is confusing and you sound as if you expect them to keep the servers on simply because they have earned your trust as a consumer--only that only works if you, the consumer, actually pay money to continue ongoing services and development. A good business is more of a mutual exchange, rather than one party emptying its pockets for the enjoyment of the other.
ZoS provide a product, we as a consumer determine if it's worth our investment. I'm not suggesting that we owe them anything. I am saying that I see crown store motifs as a fine investment, and do not see it as the "slippery-slope, pay-to-win" apocalypse.
So theyre too big to fail is what youre getting at?
A one-line lazy quip is all you mustered from my posts? Okay. Maybe read them again. I said nothing about size>choice or freedom. They're providing a service. I guarenteee some people, a lot of people, will see the value in purchasing these items around which 'controversy' swirls. Just as they did the glowing tiger-mount, and all the other cosmetic "look at me" stuff beforehand.
It's capitalism, not a conspiracy. Take off the tin foil hats people.