Callous2208 wrote: »WalkingLegacy wrote: »ESO is on the rails linear gameplay against TES open world RPG.
ESO has a structured RNG loot system and Skyrim is loot what you see.
Your choices in TES can change the outcome of the story in later game. Or things you decide can warp the game world later.
I could go on, but they're vastly different for sure. ESO is trying hard to not be a "traditional MMO" while still clearly being a "traditional MMO".
I don't disagree with what you have said but this poll is pointless. There is no certain criteria that needs to be met to be considered an ES game. They have titled It Elder Scrolls Online and used the same world, lore, ect. It's an ES game. Whether or not people enjoy the mmo aspect and changes that came with it, is irrelevant.
I voted "Yes", and I've played every Elder Scrolls since The Elder Scrolls II: Daggerfall.kawazu874b16_ESO wrote: »Viewing the vote, I feel those who voted yes never played an Elder Scrolls game !
Callous2208 wrote: »WalkingLegacy wrote: »ESO is on the rails linear gameplay against TES open world RPG.
ESO has a structured RNG loot system and Skyrim is loot what you see.
Your choices in TES can change the outcome of the story in later game. Or things you decide can warp the game world later.
I could go on, but they're vastly different for sure. ESO is trying hard to not be a "traditional MMO" while still clearly being a "traditional MMO".
I don't disagree with what you have said but this poll is pointless. There is no certain criteria that needs to be met to be considered an ES game. They have titled It Elder Scrolls Online and used the same world, lore, ect. It's an ES game. Whether or not people enjoy the mmo aspect and changes that came with it, is irrelevant.
Actually, ESO is an Elder Scrolls game.WalkingLegacy wrote: »Callous2208 wrote: »WalkingLegacy wrote: »ESO is on the rails linear gameplay against TES open world RPG.
ESO has a structured RNG loot system and Skyrim is loot what you see.
Your choices in TES can change the outcome of the story in later game. Or things you decide can warp the game world later.
I could go on, but they're vastly different for sure. ESO is trying hard to not be a "traditional MMO" while still clearly being a "traditional MMO".
I don't disagree with what you have said but this poll is pointless. There is no certain criteria that needs to be met to be considered an ES game. They have titled It Elder Scrolls Online and used the same world, lore, ect. It's an ES game. Whether or not people enjoy the mmo aspect and changes that came with it, is irrelevant.
That's fine. My point was the unknown direction they're constantly in flux with is what is taking away from what's makes an TES game.
ESO is definitely not a TES game. Just because it takes place correctly on a timeline doesn't matter.
There arent many aspects of ESO that resemble what we all know as the "true" Elder Scrolls games ...
Do you think that ESO should be considered an "Elder Scrolls" game?
Skyrim with DLCs and no mods is not even half as good as this game.
Uriel_Nocturne wrote: »Actually, ESO is an Elder Scrolls game.WalkingLegacy wrote: »Callous2208 wrote: »WalkingLegacy wrote: »ESO is on the rails linear gameplay against TES open world RPG.
ESO has a structured RNG loot system and Skyrim is loot what you see.
Your choices in TES can change the outcome of the story in later game. Or things you decide can warp the game world later.
I could go on, but they're vastly different for sure. ESO is trying hard to not be a "traditional MMO" while still clearly being a "traditional MMO".
I don't disagree with what you have said but this poll is pointless. There is no certain criteria that needs to be met to be considered an ES game. They have titled It Elder Scrolls Online and used the same world, lore, ect. It's an ES game. Whether or not people enjoy the mmo aspect and changes that came with it, is irrelevant.
That's fine. My point was the unknown direction they're constantly in flux with is what is taking away from what's makes an TES game.
ESO is definitely not a TES game. Just because it takes place correctly on a timeline doesn't matter.
It's the same thing as Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn vs. any other Final Fantasy. Final Fantasy is still a FF game.
Same with ESO. Just because there's an "Online" at the end does not disqualify it as an Elder Scrolls game.
What about Redguard or Battlespire? Those are parts of TES universe as well, released by Bethesda and considered canon.WalkingLegacy wrote: »ESO is on the rails linear gameplay against TES open world RPG.
Loot system as a defining trait of the series? Interesting. I thought TES is all about universe, and not looting someone's clothes (which might be an option in any other game, regardless of the setting).ESO has a structured RNG loot system and Skyrim is loot what you see.
And this is why we cant join Dagoth Ur and all Stormcloak/Imperial missions are essentialy the same, no matter which side... Unfortunately, most of TES quests are pretty straightforward.Your choices in TES can change the outcome of the story in later game. Or things you decide can warp the game world later.
But why do you consider gameplay details so important that they outshine tons of TES lore? And ESO contains lots of new information and books.I could go on, but they're vastly different for sure. ESO is trying hard to not be a "traditional MMO" while still clearly being a "traditional MMO".
Uriel_Nocturne wrote: »Actually, ESO is an Elder Scrolls game.WalkingLegacy wrote: »Callous2208 wrote: »WalkingLegacy wrote: »ESO is on the rails linear gameplay against TES open world RPG.
ESO has a structured RNG loot system and Skyrim is loot what you see.
Your choices in TES can change the outcome of the story in later game. Or things you decide can warp the game world later.
I could go on, but they're vastly different for sure. ESO is trying hard to not be a "traditional MMO" while still clearly being a "traditional MMO".
I don't disagree with what you have said but this poll is pointless. There is no certain criteria that needs to be met to be considered an ES game. They have titled It Elder Scrolls Online and used the same world, lore, ect. It's an ES game. Whether or not people enjoy the mmo aspect and changes that came with it, is irrelevant.
That's fine. My point was the unknown direction they're constantly in flux with is what is taking away from what's makes an TES game.
ESO is definitely not a TES game. Just because it takes place correctly on a timeline doesn't matter.
It's the same thing as Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn vs. any other Final Fantasy. Final Fantasy is still a FF game.
Same with ESO. Just because there's an "Online" at the end does not disqualify it as an Elder Scrolls game.
This is my reasoning. The game itself is a different genre, nothing more. If I thought that this game would in any way cause the single player games to stop being what they are, I would be very annoyed too. But I doubt very much that will ever be the case.
KoshkaMurka wrote: »What about Redguard or Battlespire? Those are parts of TES universe as well, released by Bethesda and considered canon.WalkingLegacy wrote: »ESO is on the rails linear gameplay against TES open world RPG.Loot system as a defining trait of the series? Interesting. I thought TES is all about universe, and not looting someone's clothes (which might be an option in any other game, regardless of the setting).ESO has a structured RNG loot system and Skyrim is loot what you see.And this is why we cant join Dagoth Ur and all Stormcloak/Imperial missions are essentialy the same, no matter which side... Unfortunately, most of TES quests are pretty straightforward.Your choices in TES can change the outcome of the story in later game. Or things you decide can warp the game world later.But why do you consider gameplay details so important that they outshine tons of TES lore? And ESO contains lots of new information and books.I could go on, but they're vastly different for sure. ESO is trying hard to not be a "traditional MMO" while still clearly being a "traditional MMO".
WalkingLegacy wrote: »Uriel_Nocturne wrote: »Actually, ESO is an Elder Scrolls game.WalkingLegacy wrote: »Callous2208 wrote: »WalkingLegacy wrote: »ESO is on the rails linear gameplay against TES open world RPG.
ESO has a structured RNG loot system and Skyrim is loot what you see.
Your choices in TES can change the outcome of the story in later game. Or things you decide can warp the game world later.
I could go on, but they're vastly different for sure. ESO is trying hard to not be a "traditional MMO" while still clearly being a "traditional MMO".
I don't disagree with what you have said but this poll is pointless. There is no certain criteria that needs to be met to be considered an ES game. They have titled It Elder Scrolls Online and used the same world, lore, ect. It's an ES game. Whether or not people enjoy the mmo aspect and changes that came with it, is irrelevant.
That's fine. My point was the unknown direction they're constantly in flux with is what is taking away from what's makes an TES game.
ESO is definitely not a TES game. Just because it takes place correctly on a timeline doesn't matter.
It's the same thing as Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn vs. any other Final Fantasy. Final Fantasy is still a FF game.
Same with ESO. Just because there's an "Online" at the end does not disqualify it as an Elder Scrolls game.
This is my reasoning. The game itself is a different genre, nothing more. If I thought that this game would in any way cause the single player games to stop being what they are, I would be very annoyed too. But I doubt very much that will ever be the case.
Just because the lore is the same, doesn't mean they feel like TES games.
The poll is lame. The things that make TES games, TES games are drastically missing from ESO. It's like a hint of Elder Scrolls while being a confused game.
lordrichter wrote: ».MrDenimChicken wrote: »I tried to play ESO like I played skyrim...as in 1st person POV and exploring and getting lost.
I played ESO for the first year, just like this. Successfully. No "pretending".
MrDenimChicken wrote: »lordrichter wrote: ».MrDenimChicken wrote: »I tried to play ESO like I played skyrim...as in 1st person POV and exploring and getting lost.
I played ESO for the first year, just like this. Successfully. No "pretending".
well you seem to be very easily entertained haha
Uriel_Nocturne wrote: »Same with ESO. Just because there's an "Online" at the end does not disqualify it as an Elder Scrolls game.
WalkingLegacy wrote: »Uriel_Nocturne wrote: »Actually, ESO is an Elder Scrolls game.WalkingLegacy wrote: »Callous2208 wrote: »WalkingLegacy wrote: »ESO is on the rails linear gameplay against TES open world RPG.
ESO has a structured RNG loot system and Skyrim is loot what you see.
Your choices in TES can change the outcome of the story in later game. Or things you decide can warp the game world later.
I could go on, but they're vastly different for sure. ESO is trying hard to not be a "traditional MMO" while still clearly being a "traditional MMO".
I don't disagree with what you have said but this poll is pointless. There is no certain criteria that needs to be met to be considered an ES game. They have titled It Elder Scrolls Online and used the same world, lore, ect. It's an ES game. Whether or not people enjoy the mmo aspect and changes that came with it, is irrelevant.
That's fine. My point was the unknown direction they're constantly in flux with is what is taking away from what's makes an TES game.
ESO is definitely not a TES game. Just because it takes place correctly on a timeline doesn't matter.
It's the same thing as Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn vs. any other Final Fantasy. Final Fantasy is still a FF game.
Same with ESO. Just because there's an "Online" at the end does not disqualify it as an Elder Scrolls game.
This is my reasoning. The game itself is a different genre, nothing more. If I thought that this game would in any way cause the single player games to stop being what they are, I would be very annoyed too. But I doubt very much that will ever be the case.
Just because the lore is the same, doesn't mean they feel like TES games.
The poll is lame. The things that make TES games, TES games are drastically missing from ESO. It's like a hint of Elder Scrolls while being a confused game.
I really said nothing about lore =\. Merely that this game is a different genre, and will not be just like the single player games no matter how hard you try. Straight up calling the poll lame isn't really helping anyone either. I get that in many ways it doesn't carry the spirit of the ES games we have played and loved, but I really could say the same about Skyrim vs Morrowind. I had gripes about it, the mechanics were changed, the map markers are annoying, quest journal wasn't even a journal, stats were missing and the magic system was lackluster, it was overall just dumbed down. But I still like it, I still consider it Elder Scrolls, just different in its own ways.
This is how I feel about ESO, it has a lot of annoying MMOisms in it, but by and large it isn't a bad MMO. (and I have played a lot of bad MMOs) The game isn't confused at all, it's an MMO and it knows it.
milesrodneymcneely2_ESO wrote: »I LOVE the lore.
I LOVE the gameplay.
For me, this is a win-win.
YMMV.
Agreed; and OP is completely wrong when defining what an "Elder Scrolls" game is. Both Arena and Daggerfall, and even Morrowind, lacked housing as we knew it in Oblivion and Skyrim. No elder scrolls game has had "World PvP" for obvious reasons. And Spell Crafting, if Im not mistaken, that wasn't in a few ES games either including Arena. Housing is in bound; we know that from what has publicly been stated. More classes would be nice though.
Actually, Morrowind had housing - I had my house near Balmora, given to me by the house of Hlaalu - near the Kwama cave south-west of Balmora.
Appleblade wrote: »I just remember some Imperial guy who never wore a shirt at home saying I could stay at his place.
Appleblade wrote: »milesrodneymcneely2_ESO wrote: »I LOVE the lore.
I LOVE the gameplay.
For me, this is a win-win.
YMMV.
Agreed; and OP is completely wrong when defining what an "Elder Scrolls" game is. Both Arena and Daggerfall, and even Morrowind, lacked housing as we knew it in Oblivion and Skyrim. No elder scrolls game has had "World PvP" for obvious reasons. And Spell Crafting, if Im not mistaken, that wasn't in a few ES games either including Arena. Housing is in bound; we know that from what has publicly been stated. More classes would be nice though.
Actually, Morrowind had housing - I had my house near Balmora, given to me by the house of Hlaalu - near the Kwama cave south-west of Balmora.
I just remember some Imperial guy who never wore a shirt at home saying I could stay at his place.
Appleblade wrote: »I just remember some Imperial guy who never wore a shirt at home saying I could stay at his place.
Caius, he was your contact with the Blades. Always found him a bit creepy, offering to let me stay there, while standing around shirtless, looking at me.
Appleblade wrote: »milesrodneymcneely2_ESO wrote: »I LOVE the lore.
I LOVE the gameplay.
For me, this is a win-win.
YMMV.
Agreed; and OP is completely wrong when defining what an "Elder Scrolls" game is. Both Arena and Daggerfall, and even Morrowind, lacked housing as we knew it in Oblivion and Skyrim. No elder scrolls game has had "World PvP" for obvious reasons. And Spell Crafting, if Im not mistaken, that wasn't in a few ES games either including Arena. Housing is in bound; we know that from what has publicly been stated. More classes would be nice though.
Actually, Morrowind had housing - I had my house near Balmora, given to me by the house of Hlaalu - near the Kwama cave south-west of Balmora.
I just remember some Imperial guy who never wore a shirt at home saying I could stay at his place.
It was an actual property you got from house Hlaalu - it was not in a good condition when you got it, but with more contracts done it got more and more nice and cleaned up. I never played house Redoran or Telvani, so I do not know if those offered as well some housing.
Edit: Hm, I cannot find any information about this house, maybe it was part of a mod then, not sure. It was located to the south-west of Balmora in that valley which leads from Balmora to the bitter coast - between the Kwama cave and Balmora.
-snippage-
THIS IS A MMO!
Yes, it has a Elder Scrolls feel to it, but it is a MMO nontheless. A MMO set in ES universe.
-snippage-
If you've ever played a MMO in the past, then you should know this by now, but if this is your first - let me educate you - accept it for what it is. Because it will never be Skyrim 2, Oblivion 2 or Morrowind 2.
WalkingLegacy wrote: »Uriel_Nocturne wrote: »Actually, ESO is an Elder Scrolls game.WalkingLegacy wrote: »Callous2208 wrote: »WalkingLegacy wrote: »ESO is on the rails linear gameplay against TES open world RPG.
ESO has a structured RNG loot system and Skyrim is loot what you see.
Your choices in TES can change the outcome of the story in later game. Or things you decide can warp the game world later.
I could go on, but they're vastly different for sure. ESO is trying hard to not be a "traditional MMO" while still clearly being a "traditional MMO".
I don't disagree with what you have said but this poll is pointless. There is no certain criteria that needs to be met to be considered an ES game. They have titled It Elder Scrolls Online and used the same world, lore, ect. It's an ES game. Whether or not people enjoy the mmo aspect and changes that came with it, is irrelevant.
That's fine. My point was the unknown direction they're constantly in flux with is what is taking away from what's makes an TES game.
ESO is definitely not a TES game. Just because it takes place correctly on a timeline doesn't matter.
It's the same thing as Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn vs. any other Final Fantasy. Final Fantasy is still a FF game.
Same with ESO. Just because there's an "Online" at the end does not disqualify it as an Elder Scrolls game.
This is my reasoning. The game itself is a different genre, nothing more. If I thought that this game would in any way cause the single player games to stop being what they are, I would be very annoyed too. But I doubt very much that will ever be the case.
Just because the lore is the same, doesn't mean they feel like TES games.
The poll is lame. The things that make TES games, TES games are drastically missing from ESO. It's like a hint of Elder Scrolls while being a confused game.
Skyrim with DLCs and no mods is not even half as good as this game.
Skyrim without mods is actually pretty poor - you can craft the best gear without to even leave whiterun and then there is no point to explore at all, because there is nothing better to find than what you already have. Of course this is a poor way to play the game, but it is possible in vanilla and it should not be that way. That is why vanilla Skyrim was very poorly designed gameplay-wise. Like always landscape and so was amazing, but without mods game mechanics are just meh.
What??Skyrim without mods is actually pretty poor - you can craft the best gear without to even leave whiterun and then there is no point to explore at all, because there is nothing better to find than what you already have. Of course this is a poor way to play the game, but it is possible in vanilla and it should not be that way. That is why vanilla Skyrim was very poorly designed
gameplay-wise. Like always landscape and so was amazing, but without mods game mechanics are just meh.