Before champ system, they were pretty even. But now with the ability to get 25% extra fire dmg no matter what race, the regen is worth more than the little bit extra fire dmg.
Hard to decide really. I went with Altmer, trading the extra 3% flame damage Dunmer get with more max magicka and regen. Altmer still do 4% bonus elemental damage, so that's not too bad considering the other bonuses you get.
Dunmer is probably the more versatile option, because you can quite easily switch between stam and magicka, but if your main aim is magicka, Altmer is always a great choice.
Hard to decide really. I went with Altmer, trading the extra 3% flame damage Dunmer get with more max magicka and regen. Altmer still do 4% bonus elemental damage, so that's not too bad considering the other bonuses you get.
Dunmer is probably the more versatile option, because you can quite easily switch between stam and magicka, but if your main aim is magicka, Altmer is always a great choice.
Afaik altmer's elemental expert passive only applies on secondary effects such as burning, not the direct fire damage of your skills.
No source but it says "...fire, frost and shock EFFECTS..." in the tooltip while in the dunmer passive it says directly "flame damage"
No source but it says "...fire, frost and shock EFFECTS..." in the tooltip while in the dunmer passive it says directly "flame damage"
Well, your right. But there are many "famous" people who have choosen HE over DE just for the reason they rate 10% magicka reg above 3% more fire dmg, so I think it improves all fire DMG, at least this is what I've heard. It's the first time some1 is mentioning it, I've never heard anything about that before (cant test it, cuz im on console).
I cant proof it, but im very sure that its 4% more fire dmg at all, I have read that alot in the forums.
3rd Option: Don't make a magika DK, unless you don't plan on playing PvP. Considering you posted in the PvP forum, I would stay away from Magika DKs. Make a cookie cutter stam NB or magika Sorc