...bonuses, in English. Not boni.
I know it might seem like it would follow the same pattern as similar words like focus or radius that have two plural forms, but it doesn't.
I'm not trying to be a grammar *** but I think that some people honestly don't realize this, so thought I'd throw it out there.
I was under the impression both bonuses and boni were correct, just only bonuses is commonly used.
What I would like to put out there is:
- It's "Dual Wield", not "Duel Wield"
- It's "have" not "of" (in "what they should have done")
- So many people have to learn the difference between there/their/they're
- It's "definitely", not "definatly", "definetly", ...
- The plural of acronyms and abbreviations is formed with "s", not "'s" (It's PUGs, not "PUG's")
I'm sure I'm forgetting something. These are the most annoying common mistakes I can think of at the time.
I was under the impression both bonuses and boni were correct, just only bonuses is commonly used.
What I would like to put out there is:
- It's "Dual Wield", not "Duel Wield"
- It's "have" not "of" (in "what they should have done")
- So many people have to learn the difference between there/their/they're
- It's "definitely", not "definatly", "definetly", ...
- The plural of acronyms and abbreviations is formed with "s", not "'s" (It's PUGs, not "PUG's")
I'm sure I'm forgetting something. These are the most annoying common mistakes I can think of at the time.
I was under the impression both bonuses and boni were correct, just only bonuses is commonly used.
What I would like to put out there is:
- It's "Dual Wield", not "Duel Wield"
- It's "have" not "of" (in "what they should have done")
- So many people have to learn the difference between there/their/they're
- It's "definitely", not "definatly", "definetly", ...
- The plural of acronyms and abbreviations is formed with "s", not "'s" (It's PUGs, not "PUG's")
I'm sure I'm forgetting something. These are the most annoying common mistakes I can think of at the time.
No, boni isn't listed in any reputable dictionary I've found. The other things you mention are spot on, though.
I was under the impression both bonuses and boni were correct, just only bonuses is commonly used.
What I would like to put out there is:
- It's "Dual Wield", not "Duel Wield"
- It's "have" not "of" (in "what they should have done")
- So many people have to learn the difference between there/their/they're
- It's "definitely", not "definatly", "definetly", ...
- The plural of acronyms and abbreviations is formed with "s", not "'s" (It's PUGs, not "PUG's")
I'm sure I'm forgetting something. These are the most annoying common mistakes I can think of at the time.
I'd also like to add 'alot' which is NOT a word. It's 'a lot'.
Also, a lot of NPCs say 'snuck' which is NOT a word in British English. It's 'sneaked'.
- The plural of acronyms and abbreviations is formed with "s", not "'s" (It's PUGs, not "PUG's")
Nazon_Katts wrote: »I was under the impression both bonuses and boni were correct, just only bonuses is commonly used.
What I would like to put out there is:
- It's "Dual Wield", not "Duel Wield"
- It's "have" not "of" (in "what they should have done")
- So many people have to learn the difference between there/their/they're
- It's "definitely", not "definatly", "definetly", ...
- The plural of acronyms and abbreviations is formed with "s", not "'s" (It's PUGs, not "PUG's")
I'm sure I'm forgetting something. These are the most annoying common mistakes I can think of at the time.
No, boni isn't listed in any reputable dictionary I've found. The other things you mention are spot on, though.
Let me guess, non of those were Latin dictionaries.
Nazon_Katts wrote: »I was under the impression both bonuses and boni were correct, just only bonuses is commonly used.
What I would like to put out there is:
- It's "Dual Wield", not "Duel Wield"
- It's "have" not "of" (in "what they should have done")
- So many people have to learn the difference between there/their/they're
- It's "definitely", not "definatly", "definetly", ...
- The plural of acronyms and abbreviations is formed with "s", not "'s" (It's PUGs, not "PUG's")
I'm sure I'm forgetting something. These are the most annoying common mistakes I can think of at the time.
No, boni isn't listed in any reputable dictionary I've found. The other things you mention are spot on, though.
Let me guess, non of those were Latin dictionaries.
Correct, because in English we use English dictionaries rather than Latin ones.
Nazon_Katts wrote: »Nazon_Katts wrote: »I was under the impression both bonuses and boni were correct, just only bonuses is commonly used.
What I would like to put out there is:
- It's "Dual Wield", not "Duel Wield"
- It's "have" not "of" (in "what they should have done")
- So many people have to learn the difference between there/their/they're
- It's "definitely", not "definatly", "definetly", ...
- The plural of acronyms and abbreviations is formed with "s", not "'s" (It's PUGs, not "PUG's")
I'm sure I'm forgetting something. These are the most annoying common mistakes I can think of at the time.
No, boni isn't listed in any reputable dictionary I've found. The other things you mention are spot on, though.
Let me guess, non of those were Latin dictionaries.
Correct, because in English we use English dictionaries rather than Latin ones.
Usage of foreign words is acceptable in English, nonetheless.
I'm reminded about it every time I see a recipe for our national dish in English, spelling the name "pierogies." It's already plural, damn it, take that s away. But what can you do?Nazon_Katts wrote: »Nazon_Katts wrote: »I was under the impression both bonuses and boni were correct, just only bonuses is commonly used.
What I would like to put out there is:
- It's "Dual Wield", not "Duel Wield"
- It's "have" not "of" (in "what they should have done")
- So many people have to learn the difference between there/their/they're
- It's "definitely", not "definatly", "definetly", ...
- The plural of acronyms and abbreviations is formed with "s", not "'s" (It's PUGs, not "PUG's")
I'm sure I'm forgetting something. These are the most annoying common mistakes I can think of at the time.
No, boni isn't listed in any reputable dictionary I've found. The other things you mention are spot on, though.
Let me guess, non of those were Latin dictionaries.
Correct, because in English we use English dictionaries rather than Latin ones.
Usage of foreign words is acceptable in English, nonetheless.
I agree, but once they enter into accepted usage they develop their own little quirks and rules that often differ from those in the original language.
Nazon_Katts wrote: »Nazon_Katts wrote: »I was under the impression both bonuses and boni were correct, just only bonuses is commonly used.
What I would like to put out there is:
- It's "Dual Wield", not "Duel Wield"
- It's "have" not "of" (in "what they should have done")
- So many people have to learn the difference between there/their/they're
- It's "definitely", not "definatly", "definetly", ...
- The plural of acronyms and abbreviations is formed with "s", not "'s" (It's PUGs, not "PUG's")
I'm sure I'm forgetting something. These are the most annoying common mistakes I can think of at the time.
No, boni isn't listed in any reputable dictionary I've found. The other things you mention are spot on, though.
Let me guess, non of those were Latin dictionaries.
Correct, because in English we use English dictionaries rather than Latin ones.
Usage of foreign words is acceptable in English, nonetheless.
You're supposed to know when to use your correct spelling of "you're and "your".
You may well be trying to lose weight in real life, but when your character (please, not "toon") supports a particular god he is following a "deity", not a "diety".
Lastly, my personal favourite for every player of WoW and other such MMOs - "rouge" is what you put on your face, "rogue" is what you want your nightblade to be.
I was under the impression both bonuses and boni were correct, just only bonuses is commonly used.
What I would like to put out there is:
- It's "Dual Wield", not "Duel Wield"
- It's "have" not "of" (in "what they should have done")
- So many people have to learn the difference between there/their/they're
- It's "definitely", not "definatly", "definetly", ...
- The plural of acronyms and abbreviations is formed with "s", not "'s" (It's PUGs, not "PUG's")
I'm sure I'm forgetting something. These are the most annoying common mistakes I can think of at the time.
Greatfellow wrote: »Yeah, but the plural of "bonus" is "bonuses".
Bonus means 'good' in Latin, so you shouldn't even be arguing it here, because we're talking about the plural of a word that doesn't mean 'good', i.e., the English "bonus".
You can make or break any rules you want, but if you were writing for any audience I write for I'd be scratching out your "boni" (yikes) and telling you to write "bonuses". I edit more than 150 documents a year, from dozens of writers, for publication to large audiences. Yep, "boni" would not get out the door. In fact, I'd call you and tease you about it, enjoy a half-hour discussion about it if you wanted, and then ask you what you were planning for lunch, see if you wanted to head over to Old Ironsides for a hamburger and beer. The beer would be a bonus. Hell, they'd both be bonuses.
Greatfellow wrote: »Nazon_Katts wrote: »Nazon_Katts wrote: »I was under the impression both bonuses and boni were correct, just only bonuses is commonly used.
What I would like to put out there is:
- It's "Dual Wield", not "Duel Wield"
- It's "have" not "of" (in "what they should have done")
- So many people have to learn the difference between there/their/they're
- It's "definitely", not "definatly", "definetly", ...
- The plural of acronyms and abbreviations is formed with "s", not "'s" (It's PUGs, not "PUG's")
I'm sure I'm forgetting something. These are the most annoying common mistakes I can think of at the time.
No, boni isn't listed in any reputable dictionary I've found. The other things you mention are spot on, though.
Let me guess, non of those were Latin dictionaries.
Correct, because in English we use English dictionaries rather than Latin ones.
Usage of foreign words is acceptable in English, nonetheless.
Yeah, but the plural of "bonus" is "bonuses".
Bonus means 'good' in Latin, so you shouldn't even be arguing it here, because we're talking about the plural of a word that doesn't mean 'good', i.e., the English "bonus".
You can make or break any rules you want, but if you were writing for any audience I write for I'd be scratching out your "boni" (yikes) and telling you to write "bonuses". I edit more than 150 documents a year, from dozens of writers, for publication to large audiences. Yep, "boni" would not get out the door. In fact, I'd call you and tease you about it, enjoy a half-hour discussion about it if you wanted, and then ask you what you were planning for lunch, see if you wanted to head over to Old Ironsides for a hamburger and beer. The beer would be a bonus. Hell, they'd both be bonuses.
Nazon_Katts wrote: »Greatfellow wrote: »Nazon_Katts wrote: »Nazon_Katts wrote: »I was under the impression both bonuses and boni were correct, just only bonuses is commonly used.
What I would like to put out there is:
- It's "Dual Wield", not "Duel Wield"
- It's "have" not "of" (in "what they should have done")
- So many people have to learn the difference between there/their/they're
- It's "definitely", not "definatly", "definetly", ...
- The plural of acronyms and abbreviations is formed with "s", not "'s" (It's PUGs, not "PUG's")
I'm sure I'm forgetting something. These are the most annoying common mistakes I can think of at the time.
No, boni isn't listed in any reputable dictionary I've found. The other things you mention are spot on, though.
Let me guess, non of those were Latin dictionaries.
Correct, because in English we use English dictionaries rather than Latin ones.
Usage of foreign words is acceptable in English, nonetheless.
Yeah, but the plural of "bonus" is "bonuses".
Bonus means 'good' in Latin, so you shouldn't even be arguing it here, because we're talking about the plural of a word that doesn't mean 'good', i.e., the English "bonus".
You can make or break any rules you want, but if you were writing for any audience I write for I'd be scratching out your "boni" (yikes) and telling you to write "bonuses". I edit more than 150 documents a year, from dozens of writers, for publication to large audiences. Yep, "boni" would not get out the door. In fact, I'd call you and tease you about it, enjoy a half-hour discussion about it if you wanted, and then ask you what you were planning for lunch, see if you wanted to head over to Old Ironsides for a hamburger and beer. The beer would be a bonus. Hell, they'd both be bonuses.
Burgers and beer? I'm sold. BONUSES it is!!! So... where is that place?