LexonLightbringer wrote: »...If by chance we don't get patch 1.1 this week or any patch, what impressions will that leave?
clocksstoppe wrote: »what measures? you think they can create an algorithm to identify bots with 100% accuracy and no false positives in a week's time?
The only game dev who managed that needed many years of anti botting techniques and experience.
Sorry to shatter your hope but this game will probably die before they ever get rid of bots so get used to them
WraithAzraiel wrote: »Likely not since at the very least numerically they still have 1.0.9 to release
stevenpotter321b14_ESO wrote: »WraithAzraiel wrote: »Likely not since at the very least numerically they still have 1.0.9 to release
They dont have to do a 1.09 and could easily go to 1.1.2.
However, I doubt they are going to launch craglorn Thursday, would wager if they were they would be announcing that to calm some people. Maybe next week. . . .
I would figure they would give some kind of a notice before releasing such a big update. That being said, it being delayed could only be a good thing as it gives them longer to work on that content plus more time to work on improving others.
LexonLightbringer wrote: »...If by chance we don't get patch 1.1 this week or any patch, what impressions will that leave?
No impression whatsoever, so used to them lie and being incompetent - my opinion about them could not possibly be any lower. lol.
Ker.Rakb16_ESO wrote: »Most likely release date is June 5th imho. That leaves just enough time for people to try it out during their first month of subscription (so nobody can claim they paid for nothing) while still forcing everybody who seriously wants to explore Craglorn to resubscribe.
LexonLightbringer wrote: »If that's the case, wouldn't that leave the impression that it wasn't delayed for quality, but delayed for retention purposes? If so, are we as a community going to allow those practices in the future?
driosketch wrote: »Craglorn is coming with the very next patch. That's my call based on a couple things I've seen. Jess mentioned during the trial stream that an announcement would be this week. It has also been posted that the fix for the caltrops will come shortly after the Craglorn patch. That makes no sense even from a cynical viewpoint, unless Craglorn was coming too soon to squeeze the hot fix in.
By the end of the week we'll see if I'm wrong or not.
LexonLightbringer wrote: »stevenpotter321b14_ESO wrote: »WraithAzraiel wrote: »Likely not since at the very least numerically they still have 1.0.9 to release
They dont have to do a 1.09 and could easily go to 1.1.2.
However, I doubt they are going to launch craglorn Thursday, would wager if they were they would be announcing that to calm some people. Maybe next week. . . .
So if not this week or next, when does the conversation steer towards incompetence. This is not a F2P game, you know? I mean they had the choice, and they chose Subscription. If this game was F2P do you think they would have received as much backlash? Is it because they are charging a subscription that people perceive this game as being rushed and unfinished?
LexonLightbringer wrote: »After realizing the game is still currently showing Patch 1.7 (not 1.8 or 1.9) do you still think its likely Patch 1.1 will release on Thursday. Most companies do not skip patch updates, its chronological for a reason.
even if it was F2P you would still get backlash cause F2P is not ever free. You still dump money from cash shops into the game so it gives people the entitlement to say they invested money and want a product.
tdilloncub18_ESO wrote: »I hope not....at least not the part that increases the VR levels.