Lol, Emperor has been pretty beastmode since the first AvA testing. But when they added the healing bonus its like they just decided, "We don't want them to die."
I wish being emperor gave you an RTS view of Cyrodiil, actually commanding your troops. It would be more interesting to give you a new play style instead of just making you the second coming of Jesus Christ.I like this personal. It makes Emperorship meaningful, like it should be.
What campaign was this on BTW?
Thechemicals wrote: »An emperor should be powerful, but should still need his army. The emperor should be weakened in power when he doesnt have enough allies around him.
Well that explains it right there. VR4 vs boosted, I would be surprised if a VR4 DK that had any brains would fall to 20 boosted players period, add in Emperor bonuses, doesn't surprise me.Sasquatch72 wrote: »I believe he was vr4 and we were all boosted. I was one of the sacrifical lambs.
I like this personal. It makes Emperorship meaningful, like it should be.
Could not agree more. Emperors should be strong as hell. They should be able to take on groups like that (especially if they were a DK).
tclark1122b14_ESO wrote: »
No, they shouldn't. It's game breaking for them to be that strong since the mechanic to dethrone them can be completely removed by that one person.
That's not even mentioning that destroying the game for a group of 20+ people to give something "cool" to 1 person in a multiplayer PvP game is just plain dumb. It's a bad mechanic, it's not fun, and any reward for victories gained by the faction should be enjoyed by the faction and not a single person who gets cheat mode enabled.