TybaltKaine wrote: »Adjust to the change and move on.
Rishikesa108 wrote: »My only answer: if you live in a big city full of smog, you can't go and breathe directly from the exhaust pipe of a bus and say that the air was already polluted, so it makes no difference. Start breathing where there is less smog!
Don't you feel affected by the 14 days of listing?
Know that your way of playing, although respectable, is different from that of others, equally respectable, who enjoy playing with trading. Everyone here has the right to have fun, and the 14 days of listing do not help with this purpose.
Sepultura_13 wrote: »I didn't vote because there was no option for those of us who used to be in "trading" guilds but were crapped on by the "helpful, friendly" guild-mates in said guilds.
I'm glad to see that their bait-and-switch rules are finally "biting" them where it hurts...and it ain't in their cankles!
Rkindaleft wrote: »[snip]
Dax_Draconis wrote: »Loving the market correction. I was finally able to afford some style pages that previously were more expensive than what I was willing to pay. Now they are mine.
Do I think the listings change was the prime factor in this? Absolutely not. But it is absolutely being pointed to as part of the reason long-time traders are departing/taking a break right now.
So clearly the numbers the OP posted don't correlate with the premise, but since we're actually discussing the effects of the listing change, I ask you a few questions.
What about the listing changes made the long term traders go?
Was it the repeat listing?
The loss of gold due to relisting?
Needing to do more work?
Followed up by:
Even if the listing changes were to go back to 30 days how would this change anything?
Would things that weren't selling miraculous start selling?
Or is it possible that some of them chose to quit rather than adapt?
AnduinTryggva wrote: »People are upset because they compare nowaday prices with prices some time ago. But it does not matter as long as everything is going down. What matters is purchasing power. Not the number. If you sell for half the money but everything costs half the money you payed before you still can buy exactly the same amount.
Of course this period of transition from a market with high numbers to a market with lower numbers is not so easy.
However I observe since about two or three weeks that prices are stabilizing for items that I survey. From that I think that we approach the new stability point. And in six months this discussion is no longer led and forgotten.
Same here. I haven't logged on for a few weeks now, and I'll also be canceling my ESO+ subscription. This is just one of the changes making the game worse, so I've moved on to better games. I may return, but I certainly have no interest in ESO lately.TybaltKaine wrote: »Adjust to the change and move on.
I have. My eso+ expired, I didn't want to resub, and I've left for now.
I'm just sad about it contributing to worsening my eso experience.
MasterSpatula wrote: »AnduinTryggva wrote: »People are upset because they compare nowaday prices with prices some time ago. But it does not matter as long as everything is going down. What matters is purchasing power. Not the number. If you sell for half the money but everything costs half the money you payed before you still can buy exactly the same amount.
Of course this period of transition from a market with high numbers to a market with lower numbers is not so easy.
However I observe since about two or three weeks that prices are stabilizing for items that I survey. From that I think that we approach the new stability point. And in six months this discussion is no longer led and forgotten.
As a ten-year player, the stuff I actually need/want to buy is all pretty new and uncommon and is holding its value just fine, while the stuff I sell in order to afford the stuff I want to buy has dropped precipitously. While materials may have dropped by around 60%, motifs have dropped by as much as 90.
So no, I most assuredly do not have the same purchasing power.
BretonMage wrote: »I think it's healthier for the game overall if prices were kept on the more affordable side.
And it's not fair to expect sellers to lower prices below the cost to make these furnishings.
AnduinTryggva wrote: »MasterSpatula wrote: »AnduinTryggva wrote: »People are upset because they compare nowaday prices with prices some time ago. But it does not matter as long as everything is going down. What matters is purchasing power. Not the number. If you sell for half the money but everything costs half the money you payed before you still can buy exactly the same amount.
Of course this period of transition from a market with high numbers to a market with lower numbers is not so easy.
However I observe since about two or three weeks that prices are stabilizing for items that I survey. From that I think that we approach the new stability point. And in six months this discussion is no longer led and forgotten.
As a ten-year player, the stuff I actually need/want to buy is all pretty new and uncommon and is holding its value just fine, while the stuff I sell in order to afford the stuff I want to buy has dropped precipitously. While materials may have dropped by around 60%, motifs have dropped by as much as 90.
So no, I most assuredly do not have the same purchasing power.
These items will go down eventually. It is naturally that in a transition time to lower prices ppl tend to be reluctant to go down with their prices for items that formerly went for high prices. They will eventually adapt to the new conditions. They just need some more time to realize the new realities.
Highwayman wrote: »
It's the sunk cost fallacy in the very most literal sense.
PDarkBHood wrote: »BretonMage wrote: »I think it's healthier for the game overall if prices were kept on the more affordable side.
And it's not fair to expect sellers to lower prices below the cost to make these furnishings.
Super glad for the market correction, but prices on some products are still too high. Lower them.
Also, let the market place dictate the prices (metaphorically) eg the average player/consumer.
I have little sympathy for you multi-millionaires/billionaires who were allowed to establish the former eco-system. You managed to keep the average player out of the market system with those extremely high prices. I hope the top 1-5% of you have left the game, we are far far better without you. I hope the bottom falls out of gold, there are way too many player buying gold for crowns/money, and this is a great way to solve this on ZOS's end.
And a reminder, it is only a game; yeah, but what a game!! Let's get back to playing ESO, instead of whining about it.
katanagirl1 wrote: »PDarkBHood wrote: »BretonMage wrote: »I think it's healthier for the game overall if prices were kept on the more affordable side.
And it's not fair to expect sellers to lower prices below the cost to make these furnishings.
Super glad for the market correction, but prices on some products are still too high. Lower them.
Also, let the market place dictate the prices (metaphorically) eg the average player/consumer.
I have little sympathy for you multi-millionaires/billionaires who were allowed to establish the former eco-system. You managed to keep the average player out of the market system with those extremely high prices. I hope the top 1-5% of you have left the game, we are far far better without you. I hope the bottom falls out of gold, there are way too many player buying gold for crowns/money, and this is a great way to solve this on ZOS's end.
And a reminder, it is only a game; yeah, but what a game!! Let's get back to playing ESO, instead of whining about it.
I’m not sure why there is this class warfare in ESO. It’s not like real life where you might be born into a rich family and acquire instant wealth.
We all start out with 0 gold and earn it somehow.
The truth about market correction will be fewer things to buy because lots of time spent farming things of high value which have to sell for low value will not continue. So it’s bad for everyone if you’re looking for rare drops.
MidniteOwl1913 wrote: »katanagirl1 wrote: »PDarkBHood wrote: »BretonMage wrote: »I think it's healthier for the game overall if prices were kept on the more affordable side.
And it's not fair to expect sellers to lower prices below the cost to make these furnishings.
Super glad for the market correction, but prices on some products are still too high. Lower them.
Also, let the market place dictate the prices (metaphorically) eg the average player/consumer.
I have little sympathy for you multi-millionaires/billionaires who were allowed to establish the former eco-system. You managed to keep the average player out of the market system with those extremely high prices. I hope the top 1-5% of you have left the game, we are far far better without you. I hope the bottom falls out of gold, there are way too many player buying gold for crowns/money, and this is a great way to solve this on ZOS's end.
And a reminder, it is only a game; yeah, but what a game!! Let's get back to playing ESO, instead of whining about it.
I’m not sure why there is this class warfare in ESO. It’s not like real life where you might be born into a rich family and acquire instant wealth.
We all start out with 0 gold and earn it somehow.
The truth about market correction will be fewer things to buy because lots of time spent farming things of high value which have to sell for low value will not continue. So it’s bad for everyone if you’re looking for rare drops.
I couldn't agree more. Really it's not the stuff, I'm selling my time. The time it takes me to dig up, chase down, or find something. Time the buyers aren't willing to spend. They are not entitled to my time for cheap.
I had been making gold mostly with cheap stuff and volume. The volume goes down. That has me thinking of switching to better stuff and charging more...