GravityX19 wrote: »Your website said you were going with Dawnbreaker. Whats with the change?
GravityX19 wrote: »Your website said you were going with Dawnbreaker. Whats with the change?
Probably the AD maxing out that campaign the first day....
Also as far as emperor... Could you add what day they made it, as a sort of timeline, maybe just mo/yr if we can't be exact.
I saw two bars of AD players in Dawnbreaker. I didn't see that maxed at any pointGravityX19 wrote: »Your website said you were going with Dawnbreaker. Whats with the change?
Probably the AD maxing out that campaign the first day....
Also as far as emperor... Could you add what day they made it, as a sort of timeline, maybe just mo/yr if we can't be exact.
GravityX19 wrote: »Not sure why people are complaining. We all started around roughly the same time and all had the same ability to get in there and PvP with people our level. Granted the PvPers that decided to go PvE hardcore to get VR first is their own choice, what is the reasoning behind this? On the BETA or PTS, it was clear that there was an imbalance between VR ranked players and non VR ranked players. This early into launch, there will be few VR players if any so it should be all an even field.
Exactly. This isn't a complaint. I was merely stating my opinion that this thread is a little premature as any crowning currently is not based on any sort of PvP achievement, but rather super guilds/large alliances going to empty campaigns and walking into keeps to crown an emperor.aweber1b14_ESO wrote: »GravityX19 wrote: »Not sure why people are complaining. We all started around roughly the same time and all had the same ability to get in there and PvP with people our level. Granted the PvPers that decided to go PvE hardcore to get VR first is their own choice, what is the reasoning behind this? On the BETA or PTS, it was clear that there was an imbalance between VR ranked players and non VR ranked players. This early into launch, there will be few VR players if any so it should be all an even field.
No complaining here, I'm just stating the fact that zerging to get Emperor isn't a PvP achievement, its a PvE achievement . If someone gets Emperor on Auriel's Bow, or on a campaign with some semblance of balance, that's impressive.
TheGrandAlliance wrote: »Guys u need to seperate EU/USA servers. I dont think eurozone has any let alone the list above.
is in the EU megaserver.Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »(03/14) Sulfr of Crime Syndicate -Aldmeri Dominion -Chrysamere Campaign
It was a good fight. I hope we get a same close battle in the next campaign.Congratulations to Sulfr, was extremely close in the end.
Being emperor is fun and all but really wish there was some more competition. Come on out EP and DC 3 day early access peeps. I will be gentle i swear .
North America cluster.Korah_Eaglecry wrote: »