Maintenance for the week of November 25:
• [COMPLETE] PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – November 25, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 7:00AM EST (12:00 UTC)
• Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – November 27, 6:00AM EST (11:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EST (14:00 UTC)
• PlayStation®: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – November 27, 6:00AM EST (11:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EST (14:00 UTC)
• [COMPLETE] PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – November 25, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 7:00AM EST (12:00 UTC)
• Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – November 27, 6:00AM EST (11:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EST (14:00 UTC)
• PlayStation®: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – November 27, 6:00AM EST (11:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EST (14:00 UTC)
Ranked Points Calculation
Rooatouille
✭✭
To start, I wanna say that I'm extremely happy with how things have been going with ToT and, more specifically, the cap that was implemented for ranked point gains/losses. That said, I do think the system could use a bit more minor tweaking just in the calculations for how much one gains for a win.
The impetus for this post is that I just played the same person in ranked three times in a row and had a net loss of 54 points despite winning 2/3 of our games. While I don't necessarily think I should have gotten +150 for both of the wins, the two wins combined should at a very least supersede the single loss. Something like a net gain of 40-50 seems more reasonable to me for winning 2/3 games against the same opponent when (relatively) evenly matched.
The impetus for this post is that I just played the same person in ranked three times in a row and had a net loss of 54 points despite winning 2/3 of our games. While I don't necessarily think I should have gotten +150 for both of the wins, the two wins combined should at a very least supersede the single loss. Something like a net gain of 40-50 seems more reasonable to me for winning 2/3 games against the same opponent when (relatively) evenly matched.
1
-
Dragonnord✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭Can't really give an opinion without knowing what's the logic ZOS uses to give x points for winning.
Maybe what they are doing is wrong, maybe it's right. Can't tell unless I know the base reason for that scoring.
SERVER: NA | PLATFORM: PC | OS: Windows 10 | CLIENT: Steam | ESO PLUS: Yes0 -
sekou_trayvond✭✭✭✭✭That's weird, Roo. Their one win must have bumped them up an algorithmic rung just enough to make your scoring weird. Or the opposite- your win dropped them precipitously, so when they come back and win- big points for them, not much for you when you return the favor.
I'd love to see the algorithm underpinning the leaderboard but methinks that won't happen
0