LordDragonMara wrote: »Cloudtrader wrote: »Having come from an MMO where auto-attacks were a thing, it shocked me that ESO didn't have them. It should be a toggle in Combat Options, and provide 50% of the damage and sustain of manual light attacks (and would obviously not animation-cancel, so you'll be getting MUCH less damage than the people actually doing it manually).
Look, I just want to be lazy. And also not exacerbate the pains in my wrist, elbow, and neck from playing too much.
This is not nagging, but a real question, how does exactly LA Weaving gives you wrist, elbow and neck pain exactly ?
How exactly timing left clicks are giving you this ? I don't get it. If this is giving you such problems, then anything in the game or any game actually going to put strain on you.
This is a legit question.
I think most people just don't get what is LA weaving and they just spam mindlessly left mouse for CPS and then "good" stuffs happen to them.
Every decent keyboard on the planet has macros built in.
Keydown = lmb
Wait = .4 sec
Keyup = lmb
Wait = .4 sec
Cycle
Anyone can do this why not just make it part of the UI.
francesinhalover wrote: »You can get Punished for using macros.
...I think
etchedpixels wrote: »francesinhalover wrote: »You can get Punished for using macros.
...I think
In theory it might be against the ToS but loads of people do it, and the current technology can put a bit of randomness in and do it entirely in the keyboard or a Pi or similar between the PC and keyboard.
Putting an option into the accessibility that gave you reasonable auto-light-attack wouldn't be a bad thing. Good enough to play the game, bad enough that doing it by hand is worthwhile.
Although for U35 solo depending how much PTS changes I imagine taping down the block button will be a better option than bothering to light attck in casual solo play.
Cloudtrader wrote: »LordDragonMara wrote: »Cloudtrader wrote: »Having come from an MMO where auto-attacks were a thing, it shocked me that ESO didn't have them. It should be a toggle in Combat Options, and provide 50% of the damage and sustain of manual light attacks (and would obviously not animation-cancel, so you'll be getting MUCH less damage than the people actually doing it manually).
Look, I just want to be lazy. And also not exacerbate the pains in my wrist, elbow, and neck from playing too much.
This is not nagging, but a real question, how does exactly LA Weaving gives you wrist, elbow and neck pain exactly ?
How exactly timing left clicks are giving you this ? I don't get it. If this is giving you such problems, then anything in the game or any game actually going to put strain on you.
This is a legit question.
I think most people just don't get what is LA weaving and they just spam mindlessly left mouse for CPS and then "good" stuffs happen to them.
ANY extra clicking just adds to the pain. I actually have a foot button installed on my wall under my computer to press for Sprint with my big toe just to reduce the load on my hands. I also tend to press too hard in tense combat situations, which I feel later as pain radiating up from my fingers into my neck. I don't button mash, but I do weave, although I've only really learned a good rotation on my main (a stamsorc) and not my alts.
And yes, most of the game does put strain on me. I don't play many hours due to that (except for decorating houses, that doesn't put much strain on me, lol). I rarely run 4-mans, and mostly only do Normals. I run Normal trials once or twice a week with my guilds. And I don't PvP unless it's a guild event. Even if they do add auto-attack LAs, I'm going to be hurting still. But... it might be better?
LOL, whatever, I really don't care if they do or not, I just answered the survey. I think reduced damage and sustain auto-LAs would be a good middle-ground, and it wouldn't affect the people who want to keep manual LAs going for all the extra damage goodness.
JustAGoodPlayer wrote: »It sound as agressive marketing promotion of some bad goods no one wants )))
I don't want the game to play for me.
francesinhalover wrote: »JustAGoodPlayer wrote: »It sound as agressive marketing promotion of some bad goods no one wants )))
clearly many want it,I don't want the game to play for me.
than...don't turn it on...
I don't want the game to play for me.francesinhalover wrote: »JustAGoodPlayer wrote: »It sound as agressive marketing promotion of some bad goods no one wants )))
clearly many want it,I don't want the game to play for me.
than...don't turn it on...
59% of this poll do not want it.
francesinhalover wrote: »JustAGoodPlayer wrote: »It sound as agressive marketing promotion of some bad goods no one wants )))
clearly many want it,I don't want the game to play for me.
than...don't turn it on...